Head-to-head · Resource Scheduling
Float vs SAVIOM
Float leads on 0 checks, SAVIOM on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFloat · 8.7/10
- Free trialboth
Float scores higher on our rubric for resource scheduling: 8.7 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.
Float is the better fit for service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets. SAVIOM is the better fit for organizations balancing resource demand and capacity.
- Float fits best
Service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets
- SAVIOM fits best
Organizations balancing resource demand and capacity
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Float 8.7/10 Visit ↗ | SAVIOM 8.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Ranking | #2 in Resource Scheduling | #7 in Resource Scheduling |
| Best for | Service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets | Organizations balancing resource demand and capacity |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $7/mo | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | 30 days | 60 days |
| Free trial length | 30 days | 60 days |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Integrations | 9 integrations | 6 integrations |
| Features Float 0/3 · SAVIOM 0/3 | ||
| Capacity planning | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Conflict detection | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Mobile apps | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Schedulable resources | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Availability views | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Listed integrations | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Float brings resource scheduling and project planning together for agencies, professional services firms, and in-house delivery teams. It is aimed at teams that need to allocate work against people’s availability while keeping an eye on… Read the review → |
SAVIOM brings resource forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, allocation, time management, and reporting into a configurable enterprise resource and workforce management product. It is aimed at medium-sized and large organizations,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Float — where it wins
- Plans capacity, availability, time off, and recurring work in one schedule
- Compares scheduled and logged time with prefilled timesheets
- Tracks project estimates, rates, budgets, and profitability
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
- Time tracking and advanced reporting require the Pro plan
- Enterprise pricing is by sales contact
SAVIOM — where it wins
- Combines demand forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, and allocation
- Tracks time, approvals, planned-versus-actuals, and utilization
- Connects with ERP, HR, PPM, project planning, and BI systems
Where it doesn't
- Pricing is quote-based rather than publicly listed
- Platform support is limited to web
- A 60-day trial call to action differs from the FAQ’s 4–6-week trial description
- Float8.7/10 · 30-day trial
Float connects team capacity, project schedules, tracked time, and budgets.
Visit FloatFull verdict → - SAVIOM8.2/10 · Pricing on request · 60-day trial
A configurable resource planning suite for organizations balancing demand and capacity.
Visit SAVIOMFull verdict →
More comparisons
- B2W Software vs Float
- B2W Software vs SAVIOM
- Float vs eResource Scheduler
- Float vs Birdview
- Float vs Kantata
- Float vs Runn
- Float vs Teamdeck
- Birdview vs SAVIOM
All resource scheduling comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






