Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Resource Scheduling

Float vs SAVIOM

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Float #2 in Resource Scheduling 8.7/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Float
SAVIOM #7 in Resource Scheduling 8.2/10 Pricing on request · 60-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit SAVIOM

Float leads on 0 checks, SAVIOM on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFloat · 8.7/10
  • Free trialboth

Float scores higher on our rubric for resource scheduling: 8.7 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

Float is the better fit for service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets. SAVIOM is the better fit for organizations balancing resource demand and capacity.

  • Float fits best

    Service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets

  • SAVIOM fits best

    Organizations balancing resource demand and capacity

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Float 8.7/10 Visit ↗ SAVIOM 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.2
Ranking #2 in Resource Scheduling #7 in Resource Scheduling
Best for Service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets Organizations balancing resource demand and capacity
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $7/mo —
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days 60 days
Free trial length 30 days 60 days
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Integrations 9 integrations 6 integrations
Features Float 0/3 · SAVIOM 0/3
Capacity planning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Conflict detection Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile apps Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Schedulable resources Not checked yet Not checked yet
Availability views Not checked yet Not checked yet
Listed integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Plans capacity, availability, time off, and recurring work in one schedule
  • Compares scheduled and logged time with prefilled timesheets
  • Tracks project estimates, rates, budgets, and profitability
  • Combines demand forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, and allocation
  • Tracks time, approvals, planned-versus-actuals, and utilization
  • Connects with ERP, HR, PPM, project planning, and BI systems
Cons
  • No free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
  • Time tracking and advanced reporting require the Pro plan
  • Enterprise pricing is by sales contact
  • Pricing is quote-based rather than publicly listed
  • Platform support is limited to web
  • A 60-day trial call to action differs from the FAQ’s 4–6-week trial description
Our verdict

Float brings resource scheduling and project planning together for agencies, professional services firms, and in-house delivery teams. It is aimed at teams that need to allocate work against people’s availability while keeping an eye on…

Read the review →

SAVIOM brings resource forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, allocation, time management, and reporting into a configurable enterprise resource and workforce management product. It is aimed at medium-sized and large organizations,…

Read the review →
  1. FloatResource Scheduling 8.730-day trial
  2. SAVIOMResource Scheduling 8.2Pricing on request · 60-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Float — where it wins

    • Plans capacity, availability, time off, and recurring work in one schedule
    • Compares scheduled and logged time with prefilled timesheets
    • Tracks project estimates, rates, budgets, and profitability

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
    • Time tracking and advanced reporting require the Pro plan
    • Enterprise pricing is by sales contact
  • SAVIOM — where it wins

    • Combines demand forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, and allocation
    • Tracks time, approvals, planned-versus-actuals, and utilization
    • Connects with ERP, HR, PPM, project planning, and BI systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is quote-based rather than publicly listed
    • Platform support is limited to web
    • A 60-day trial call to action differs from the FAQ’s 4–6-week trial description
  • Float8.7/10 · 30-day trial

    Float connects team capacity, project schedules, tracked time, and budgets.

    Visit FloatFull verdict →
  • SAVIOM8.2/10 · Pricing on request · 60-day trial

    A configurable resource planning suite for organizations balancing demand and capacity.

    Visit SAVIOMFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update