Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Resource Scheduling

Float vs Runn

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Float #2 in Resource Scheduling 8.7/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Float
Runn #6 in Resource Scheduling 8.3/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Runn

Float leads on 0 checks, Runn on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreFloat · 8.7/10
  • Free trialboth

Float scores higher on our rubric for resource scheduling: 8.7 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Float is the better fit for service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets. Runn is the better fit for teams forecasting people across projects and scenarios.

  • Float fits best

    Service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets

  • Runn fits best

    Teams forecasting people across projects and scenarios

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Float 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Runn 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.3
Ranking #2 in Resource Scheduling #6 in Resource Scheduling
Best for Service teams balancing capacity, time, and budgets Teams forecasting people across projects and scenarios
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price $7/mo $7/seat/mo
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days 30 days
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, Chrome extension
Integrations 9 integrations 18 integrations
Features Float 0/3 · Runn 0/3
Capacity planning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Conflict detection Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile apps Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Schedulable resources Not checked yet Not checked yet
Availability views Not checked yet Not checked yet
Listed integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Plans capacity, availability, time off, and recurring work in one schedule
  • Compares scheduled and logged time with prefilled timesheets
  • Tracks project estimates, rates, budgets, and profitability
  • Plans assignments, capacity, utilization, and tentative projects in one place
  • Scenario planning and planned-versus-actual hours support forecasting
  • REST API and integrations connect HR, project, time-tracking, and automation tools
Cons
  • No free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
  • Time tracking and advanced reporting require the Pro plan
  • Enterprise pricing is by sales contact
  • Not designed for task management or project delivery management
  • Not designed to be viewed on mobile devices
  • Advanced pricing is custom rather than a published monthly seat price
Our verdict

Float brings resource scheduling and project planning together for agencies, professional services firms, and in-house delivery teams. It is aimed at teams that need to allocate work against people’s availability while keeping an eye on…

Read the review →

Runn is resource management and capacity planning software for teams that need to plan people across project-based work. Its focus suits professional services, delivery, engineering, and operations teams managing assignments and changing…

Read the review →
  1. FloatResource Scheduling 8.730-day trial
  2. RunnResource Scheduling 8.330-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Float — where it wins

    • Plans capacity, availability, time off, and recurring work in one schedule
    • Compares scheduled and logged time with prefilled timesheets
    • Tracks project estimates, rates, budgets, and profitability

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; the trial lasts 30 days
    • Time tracking and advanced reporting require the Pro plan
    • Enterprise pricing is by sales contact
  • Runn — where it wins

    • Plans assignments, capacity, utilization, and tentative projects in one place
    • Scenario planning and planned-versus-actual hours support forecasting
    • REST API and integrations connect HR, project, time-tracking, and automation tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Not designed for task management or project delivery management
    • Not designed to be viewed on mobile devices
    • Advanced pricing is custom rather than a published monthly seat price
  • Float8.7/10 · 30-day trial

    Float connects team capacity, project schedules, tracked time, and budgets.

    Visit FloatFull verdict →
  • Runn8.3/10 · 30-day trial

    Forecast project staffing, capacity, and utilization with scenario planning and timesheets.

    Visit RunnFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update