Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Elicit vs Scite

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Elicit #1 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Elicit
Scite #7 in AI Research Assistants 6.0/10 Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Scite

Elicit leads on 4 checks, Scite on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreElicit · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresElicit · 4 of 4

Elicit scores higher on our rubric for ai research assistants: 9.0 against 6.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.

Elicit offers source citations; Scite doesn't publish it. Elicit offers deep research mode; Scite doesn't publish it. Elicit offers file uploads; Scite doesn't publish it. Elicit offers team workspace; Scite doesn't publish it.

Elicit is the better fit for academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis. Scite is the better fit for citation context and evidence reliability checking.

  • Elicit fits best

    Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis

  • Scite fits best

    Citation context and evidence reliability checking

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Elicit 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Scite 6.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 6.0
Ranking #1 in AI Research Assistants #7 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis Citation context and evidence reliability checking
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $11/user/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, Chrome extension
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Elicit 4/4 · Scite 0/4
Source citations ✓ (best) Not published
Deep research mode ✓ (best) Not published
File uploads ✓ (best) Not published
Team workspace ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Source access Web+files Not published
Source limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
  • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
  • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers
  • Smart Citations classify sources as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning.
  • Reference Check, citation reports, alerts, and dashboards support evidence review.
  • Works across web, Chrome, API, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.
Cons
  • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
  • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
  • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Basic starts at $20 per month when billed annually.
  • The Free plan excludes Assistant and Search access.
  • Mobile apps are not available.
Our verdict

Elicit is a web-based AI research assistant for researchers, analysts, academics, and teams. It combines semantic and keyword search across academic papers and clinical trials with research-agent workflows, structured reports, source…

Read the review →

Scite is an AI-powered research platform for students, academics, researchers, and research-intensive organizations. It searches full-text scholarly literature and provides an AI Assistant grounded in peer-reviewed research. Its central…

Read the review →
  1. ElicitAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo
  2. SciteAI Research Assistants 6.0Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
    • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
    • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers

    Where it doesn't

    • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
    • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
    • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Scite — where it wins

    • Smart Citations classify sources as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning.
    • Reference Check, citation reports, alerts, and dashboards support evidence review.
    • Works across web, Chrome, API, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.

    Where it doesn't

    • Basic starts at $20 per month when billed annually.
    • The Free plan excludes Assistant and Search access.
    • Mobile apps are not available.
  • Elicit9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo

    A focused research assistant for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and clinical-trial analysis.

    Visit ElicitFull verdict →
  • Scite6.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial

    A strong choice for checking citation context, evidence, and research claims.

    Visit SciteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026