Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Elicit vs Consensus

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Elicit #1 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Elicit
Consensus #2 in AI Research Assistants 4.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Consensus

Elicit leads on 4 checks, Consensus on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreElicit · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresElicit · 4 of 4

Elicit scores higher on our rubric for ai research assistants: 9.0 against 4.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Elicit offers source citations; Consensus doesn't publish it. Elicit offers deep research mode; Consensus doesn't publish it. Elicit offers file uploads; Consensus doesn't publish it. Elicit offers team workspace; Consensus doesn't publish it.

Elicit is the better fit for academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis. Consensus is the better fit for researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis.

  • Elicit fits best

    Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis

  • Consensus fits best

    Researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Elicit 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Consensus 4.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 4.0
Ranking #1 in AI Research Assistants #2 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis Researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $11/user/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Mobile
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Elicit 4/4 · Consensus 0/4
Source citations ✓ (best) Not published
Deep research mode ✓ (best) Not published
File uploads ✓ (best) Not published
Team workspace ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Source access Web+files Not published
Source limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
  • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
  • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers
  • Broad search across papers, authors, DOIs, topics, and study details
  • Deep reviews, Study Snapshots, citation graphs, and inline citations
  • Web, iOS, Android, API, Zotero, ChatGPT, Claude, and MCP support
Cons
  • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
  • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
  • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • The Free plan limits Pro messages, Deep reviews, snapshots, and API/MCP calls
  • Full-text analysis depends on paper availability
  • Enterprise access uses custom pricing and targets organizations over 200 users
Our verdict

Elicit is a web-based AI research assistant for researchers, analysts, academics, and teams. It combines semantic and keyword search across academic papers and clinical trials with research-agent workflows, structured reports, source…

Read the review →

Consensus is an AI search engine and workspace for scientific research. It is designed for researchers, clinicians, students, and research teams that need to find academic papers, synthesize findings, and connect claims with supporting…

Read the review →
  1. ElicitAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo
  2. ConsensusAI Research Assistants 4.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
    • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
    • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers

    Where it doesn't

    • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
    • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
    • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Consensus — where it wins

    • Broad search across papers, authors, DOIs, topics, and study details
    • Deep reviews, Study Snapshots, citation graphs, and inline citations
    • Web, iOS, Android, API, Zotero, ChatGPT, Claude, and MCP support

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free plan limits Pro messages, Deep reviews, snapshots, and API/MCP calls
    • Full-text analysis depends on paper availability
    • Enterprise access uses custom pricing and targets organizations over 200 users
  • Elicit9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo

    A focused research assistant for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and clinical-trial analysis.

    Visit ElicitFull verdict →
  • Consensus4.0/10 · Free plan

    A broad scholarly search workspace with deep analysis, citations, and research integrations.

    Visit ConsensusFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026