Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Consensus vs Scholarly

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Consensus #2 in AI Research Assistants 4.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Consensus
Higher score Scholarly #3 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual) Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Scholarly

Consensus leads on 0 checks, Scholarly on 4, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreScholarly · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresScholarly · 4 of 4

Scholarly scores higher on our rubric for ai research assistants: 9.0 against 4.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #2.

Scholarly offers source citations; Consensus doesn't publish it. Scholarly offers deep research mode; Consensus doesn't publish it. Scholarly offers file uploads; Consensus doesn't publish it. Scholarly offers team workspace; Consensus doesn't publish it.

Consensus is the better fit for researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis. Scholarly is the better fit for multi-source research with files and team workflows.

  • Consensus fits best

    Researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis

  • Scholarly fits best

    Multi-source research with files and team workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Consensus 4.0/10 Visit ↗ Scholarly 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 4.0 9.0
Ranking #2 in AI Research Assistants #3 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis Multi-source research with files and team workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published $12/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Live chat, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Consensus 0/4 · Scholarly 4/4
Source citations Not published ✓ (best)
Deep research mode Not published ✓ (best)
File uploads Not published ✓ (best)
Team workspace Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Source access Not published Web+files+connectors
Source limit Not published 10 sources
Our review
Pros
  • Broad search across papers, authors, DOIs, topics, and study details
  • Deep reviews, Study Snapshots, citation graphs, and inline citations
  • Web, iOS, Android, API, Zotero, ChatGPT, Claude, and MCP support
  • Deep Research produces cited reports with source verification
  • Analyzes web sources, PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text files
  • Team plans include shared libraries, roles, and centralized billing
Cons
  • The Free plan limits Pro messages, Deep reviews, snapshots, and API/MCP calls
  • Full-text analysis depends on paper availability
  • Enterprise access uses custom pricing and targets organizations over 200 users
  • Web-only platform coverage
  • Free plan includes one lifetime AI creation credit
  • Google Drive is the listed source connection
Our verdict

Consensus is an AI search engine and workspace for scientific research. It is designed for researchers, clinicians, students, and research teams that need to find academic papers, synthesize findings, and connect claims with supporting…

Read the review →

Scholarly is an AI workspace for researchers, professionals, teams, and students who need to investigate questions across web sources and uploaded files. Its Deep Research mode supports multi-step investigation with cited reports, while…

Read the review →
  1. ConsensusAI Research Assistants 4.0Free plan
  2. ScholarlyAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual)

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Consensus — where it wins

    • Broad search across papers, authors, DOIs, topics, and study details
    • Deep reviews, Study Snapshots, citation graphs, and inline citations
    • Web, iOS, Android, API, Zotero, ChatGPT, Claude, and MCP support

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free plan limits Pro messages, Deep reviews, snapshots, and API/MCP calls
    • Full-text analysis depends on paper availability
    • Enterprise access uses custom pricing and targets organizations over 200 users
  • Scholarly — where it wins

    • Deep Research produces cited reports with source verification
    • Analyzes web sources, PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text files
    • Team plans include shared libraries, roles, and centralized billing

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only platform coverage
    • Free plan includes one lifetime AI creation credit
    • Google Drive is the listed source connection
  • Consensus4.0/10 · Free plan

    A broad scholarly search workspace with deep analysis, citations, and research integrations.

    Visit ConsensusFull verdict →
  • Scholarly9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual)

    A cited research workspace for web, file, and team-based investigation.

    Visit ScholarlyFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026