Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Elicit vs Scholarly

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Elicit #1 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Elicit
Scholarly #3 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual) Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Scholarly

Elicit leads on 1 check, Scholarly on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Lowest starting priceElicit · $11/user/mo
  • Free planboth

Elicit and Scholarly score identically on our rubric (9.0 out of 10) for ai research assistants; Elicit sits at #1 and Scholarly at #3 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Elicit is cheaper to start at $11/user/mo against $12/user/mo. On source access, Scholarly gives you Web+files+connectors where Elicit offers Web+files.

Elicit is the better fit for academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis. Scholarly is the better fit for multi-source research with files and team workflows.

  • Elicit fits best

    Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis

  • Scholarly fits best

    Multi-source research with files and team workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Elicit 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Scholarly 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 9.0
Ranking #1 in AI Research Assistants #3 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis Multi-source research with files and team workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $11/user/mo (best) $12/user/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 1 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Elicit 4/4 · Scholarly 4/4
Source citations ✓ ✓
Deep research mode ✓ ✓
File uploads ✓ ✓
Team workspace ✓ ✓
Specs
Source access Web+files Web+files+connectors
Source limit Not published 10 sources
Our review
Pros
  • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
  • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
  • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers
  • Deep Research produces cited reports with source verification
  • Analyzes web sources, PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text files
  • Team plans include shared libraries, roles, and centralized billing
Cons
  • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
  • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
  • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Web-only platform coverage
  • Free plan includes one lifetime AI creation credit
  • Google Drive is the listed source connection
Our verdict

Elicit is a web-based AI research assistant for researchers, analysts, academics, and teams. It combines semantic and keyword search across academic papers and clinical trials with research-agent workflows, structured reports, source…

Read the review →

Scholarly is an AI workspace for researchers, professionals, teams, and students who need to investigate questions across web sources and uploaded files. Its Deep Research mode supports multi-step investigation with cited reports, while…

Read the review →
  1. ElicitAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo
  2. ScholarlyAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual)

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
    • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
    • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers

    Where it doesn't

    • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
    • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
    • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Scholarly — where it wins

    • Deep Research produces cited reports with source verification
    • Analyzes web sources, PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text files
    • Team plans include shared libraries, roles, and centralized billing

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only platform coverage
    • Free plan includes one lifetime AI creation credit
    • Google Drive is the listed source connection
  • Elicit9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo

    A focused research assistant for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and clinical-trial analysis.

    Visit ElicitFull verdict →
  • Scholarly9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual)

    A cited research workspace for web, file, and team-based investigation.

    Visit ScholarlyFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026