Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Elicit vs Folio

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Elicit #1 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Elicit
Folio #6 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $9.99/mo Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Folio

Elicit leads on 0 checks, Folio on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planboth

Elicit and Folio score identically on our rubric (9.0 out of 10) for ai research assistants; Elicit sits at #1 and Folio at #6 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

On source access, Folio gives you Web+files+connectors where Elicit offers Web+files.

Elicit is the better fit for academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis. Folio is the better fit for researchers building a connected personal library.

  • Elicit fits best

    Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis

  • Folio fits best

    Researchers building a connected personal library

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Elicit 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Folio 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 9.0
Ranking #1 in AI Research Assistants #6 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Academic literature reviews and evidence synthesis Researchers building a connected personal library
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $11/user/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, Chrome extension
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA GDPR
Integrations 5 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Elicit 4/4 · Folio 4/4
Source citations ✓ ✓
Deep research mode ✓ ✓
File uploads ✓ ✓
Team workspace ✓ ✓
Specs
Source access Web+files Web+files+connectors
Source limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
  • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
  • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers
  • Grounded AI answers with linked citations from your library
  • Broad search, citation graphs, and Research Radar support discovery
  • Free Scholar plan includes unlimited documents and sources
Cons
  • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
  • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
  • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Scholar has a monthly AI allowance
  • Advanced integrity and discovery features require Fellow
  • Available through web and Chrome extension
Our verdict

Elicit is a web-based AI research assistant for researchers, analysts, academics, and teams. It combines semantic and keyword search across academic papers and clinical trials with research-agent workflows, structured reports, source…

Read the review →

Folio is a research workspace for students, academics, instructors, and institutions. It brings together scholarly and web search, source libraries, document writing, citation management, AI answers grounded in user-provided materials, and…

Read the review →
  1. ElicitAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo
  2. FolioAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $9.99/mo

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Elicit — where it wins

    • Searches academic papers and clinical trials with semantic and keyword options
    • Supports systematic-review screening, extraction, reports, and sentence-level citations
    • Free plan plus API access, exports, alerts, and collaboration on higher tiers

    Where it doesn't

    • Advanced workflows and larger usage allowances require paid annual-billing tiers
    • Clinical-trial search and exports are added with Plus rather than Basic
    • Enterprise features such as SSO, SAML, and custom deployments need a custom plan
  • Folio — where it wins

    • Grounded AI answers with linked citations from your library
    • Broad search, citation graphs, and Research Radar support discovery
    • Free Scholar plan includes unlimited documents and sources

    Where it doesn't

    • Scholar has a monthly AI allowance
    • Advanced integrity and discovery features require Fellow
    • Available through web and Chrome extension
  • Elicit9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $11/user/mo

    A focused research assistant for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and clinical-trial analysis.

    Visit ElicitFull verdict →
  • Folio9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $9.99/mo

    A connected research library with grounded AI, citation tools, discovery, and integrity checks.

    Visit FolioFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026