Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Consensus vs Scite

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Consensus #2 in AI Research Assistants 4.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Consensus
Higher score Scite #7 in AI Research Assistants 6.0/10 Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Scite

Consensus leads on 0 checks, Scite on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreScite · 6.0/10
  • Free planboth

Scite scores higher on our rubric for ai research assistants: 6.0 against 4.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #2.

Consensus is the better fit for researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis. Scite is the better fit for citation context and evidence reliability checking.

  • Consensus fits best

    Researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis

  • Scite fits best

    Citation context and evidence reliability checking

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Consensus 4.0/10 Visit ↗ Scite 6.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 4.0 6.0
Ranking #2 in AI Research Assistants #7 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Researchers needing broad scholarly search and analysis Citation context and evidence reliability checking
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, Chrome extension
Support Email, Live chat, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Consensus 0/4 · Scite 0/4
Source citations Not published Not published
Deep research mode Not published Not published
File uploads Not published Not published
Team workspace Not published Not published
Specs
Source access Not published Not published
Source limit Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Broad search across papers, authors, DOIs, topics, and study details
  • Deep reviews, Study Snapshots, citation graphs, and inline citations
  • Web, iOS, Android, API, Zotero, ChatGPT, Claude, and MCP support
  • Smart Citations classify sources as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning.
  • Reference Check, citation reports, alerts, and dashboards support evidence review.
  • Works across web, Chrome, API, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.
Cons
  • The Free plan limits Pro messages, Deep reviews, snapshots, and API/MCP calls
  • Full-text analysis depends on paper availability
  • Enterprise access uses custom pricing and targets organizations over 200 users
  • Basic starts at $20 per month when billed annually.
  • The Free plan excludes Assistant and Search access.
  • Mobile apps are not available.
Our verdict

Consensus is an AI search engine and workspace for scientific research. It is designed for researchers, clinicians, students, and research teams that need to find academic papers, synthesize findings, and connect claims with supporting…

Read the review →

Scite is an AI-powered research platform for students, academics, researchers, and research-intensive organizations. It searches full-text scholarly literature and provides an AI Assistant grounded in peer-reviewed research. Its central…

Read the review →
  1. ConsensusAI Research Assistants 4.0Free plan
  2. SciteAI Research Assistants 6.0Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Consensus — where it wins

    • Broad search across papers, authors, DOIs, topics, and study details
    • Deep reviews, Study Snapshots, citation graphs, and inline citations
    • Web, iOS, Android, API, Zotero, ChatGPT, Claude, and MCP support

    Where it doesn't

    • The Free plan limits Pro messages, Deep reviews, snapshots, and API/MCP calls
    • Full-text analysis depends on paper availability
    • Enterprise access uses custom pricing and targets organizations over 200 users
  • Scite — where it wins

    • Smart Citations classify sources as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning.
    • Reference Check, citation reports, alerts, and dashboards support evidence review.
    • Works across web, Chrome, API, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.

    Where it doesn't

    • Basic starts at $20 per month when billed annually.
    • The Free plan excludes Assistant and Search access.
    • Mobile apps are not available.
  • Consensus4.0/10 · Free plan

    A broad scholarly search workspace with deep analysis, citations, and research integrations.

    Visit ConsensusFull verdict →
  • Scite6.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial

    A strong choice for checking citation context, evidence, and research claims.

    Visit SciteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026