Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Research Assistants

Scholarly vs Scite

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Scholarly #3 in AI Research Assistants 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual) Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Scholarly
Scite #7 in AI Research Assistants 6.0/10 Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Scite

Scholarly leads on 4 checks, Scite on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreScholarly · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresScholarly · 4 of 4

Scholarly scores higher on our rubric for ai research assistants: 9.0 against 6.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

Scholarly offers source citations; Scite doesn't publish it. Scholarly offers deep research mode; Scite doesn't publish it. Scholarly offers file uploads; Scite doesn't publish it. Scholarly offers team workspace; Scite doesn't publish it.

Scholarly is the better fit for multi-source research with files and team workflows. Scite is the better fit for citation context and evidence reliability checking.

  • Scholarly fits best

    Multi-source research with files and team workflows

  • Scite fits best

    Citation context and evidence reliability checking

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Scholarly 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Scite 6.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 6.0
Ranking #3 in AI Research Assistants #7 in AI Research Assistants
Best for Multi-source research with files and team workflows Citation context and evidence reliability checking
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $12/user/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, Chrome extension
Support Email, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 1 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Scholarly 4/4 · Scite 0/4
Source citations ✓ (best) Not published
Deep research mode ✓ (best) Not published
File uploads ✓ (best) Not published
Team workspace ✓ (best) Not published
Specs
Source access Web+files+connectors Not published
Source limit 10 sources Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Deep Research produces cited reports with source verification
  • Analyzes web sources, PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text files
  • Team plans include shared libraries, roles, and centralized billing
  • Smart Citations classify sources as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning.
  • Reference Check, citation reports, alerts, and dashboards support evidence review.
  • Works across web, Chrome, API, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.
Cons
  • Web-only platform coverage
  • Free plan includes one lifetime AI creation credit
  • Google Drive is the listed source connection
  • Basic starts at $20 per month when billed annually.
  • The Free plan excludes Assistant and Search access.
  • Mobile apps are not available.
Our verdict

Scholarly is an AI workspace for researchers, professionals, teams, and students who need to investigate questions across web sources and uploaded files. Its Deep Research mode supports multi-step investigation with cited reports, while…

Read the review →

Scite is an AI-powered research platform for students, academics, researchers, and research-intensive organizations. It searches full-text scholarly literature and provides an AI Assistant grounded in peer-reviewed research. Its central…

Read the review →
  1. ScholarlyAI Research Assistants 9.0Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual)
  2. SciteAI Research Assistants 6.0Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Scholarly — where it wins

    • Deep Research produces cited reports with source verification
    • Analyzes web sources, PDFs, Word, PowerPoint, and text files
    • Team plans include shared libraries, roles, and centralized billing

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only platform coverage
    • Free plan includes one lifetime AI creation credit
    • Google Drive is the listed source connection
  • Scite — where it wins

    • Smart Citations classify sources as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning.
    • Reference Check, citation reports, alerts, and dashboards support evidence review.
    • Works across web, Chrome, API, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.

    Where it doesn't

    • Basic starts at $20 per month when billed annually.
    • The Free plan excludes Assistant and Search access.
    • Mobile apps are not available.
  • Scholarly9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $12/user/mo (annual)

    A cited research workspace for web, file, and team-based investigation.

    Visit ScholarlyFull verdict →
  • Scite6.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $20/mo (annual) · 7-day trial

    A strong choice for checking citation context, evidence, and research claims.

    Visit SciteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on AI research assistants

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026