Head-to-head · Systematic Review Software
Catchii vs ReviQ
Catchii leads on 1 check, ReviQ on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreCatchii · 6.9/10
- Free planboth
Catchii scores higher on our rubric for systematic review software: 6.9 against 6.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.
Catchii offers full-text storage; ReviQ doesn't publish it. ReviQ offers protocol support; Catchii doesn't publish it.
Catchii is the better fit for free teams needing complete screening. ReviQ is the better fit for reproducible open-source reviews.
- Catchii fits best
Free teams needing complete screening
- ReviQ fits best
Reproducible open-source reviews
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Catchii 6.9/10 Visit ↗ | ReviQ 6.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 6.9 | 6.6 |
| Ranking | #6 in Systematic Review Software | #7 in Systematic Review Software |
| Best for | Free teams needing complete screening | Reproducible open-source reviews |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Community, Docs | Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business | Solo, Small business |
| Features Catchii 3/4 · ReviQ 3/4 | ||
| Reference deduplication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data extraction | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full-text storage | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Protocol support | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Specs | ||
| Blinded screening | Double | Not published |
| Collaborator limit | Not published | 5 users |
| Review types | systematic review | systematic literature review; multivocal literature review |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Catchii is a web-based systematic review screening tool for researchers working with scientific literature. It supports importing references from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, OVID, CSV, and reference managers, then carries the workflow… Read the review → |
ReviQ is a Docker-based, locally deployed workbench for systematic literature reviews and multivocal literature reviews. It is aimed at researchers who need a structured process from protocol definition through reporting and replication.… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Catchii — where it wins
- Free plan supports multiple users with no subscription fees or paid upgrades
- Covers screening, deduplication, extraction, exports, and PRISMA flowcharts
- Offline screening and Auto Reviewer support flexible literature workflows
Where it doesn't
- The platform is web-based, with no other platform listed
- AI assistance is focused on first-phase screening
- Data extraction is provided as free-text extraction
ReviQ — where it wins
- Deduplicates references across databases using DOI and bibliographic fields
- Supports screening conflicts, full-text tracking, and citation snowballing
- Exports PRISMA reports, BibTeX files, and ZIP-based replication packages
Where it doesn't
- Collaboration relies on exported and imported decision files
- Docker deployment requires local setup
- No authentication is enabled by default
- Catchii6.9/10 · Free plan
A complete free workflow for screening, extraction, collaboration, and PRISMA reporting.
Visit CatchiiFull verdict → - ReviQ6.6/10 · Free plan
A free, open-source review workbench with strong reproducibility features and a five-collaborator limit.
Visit ReviQFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Covexe vs Catchii
- Covexe vs ReviQ
- PICO Portal vs Catchii
- PICO Portal vs ReviQ
- Rayyan vs Catchii
- Rayyan vs ReviQ
- Silvi vs Catchii
- Silvi vs ReviQ
All systematic review software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update