Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Enterprise Information Archiving Software

Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service vs OpenText InfoArchive

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
OpenText InfoArchive #4 in Enterprise Information Archiving Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 1 of 5 features Visit site

Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service leads on 0 checks, OpenText InfoArchive on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service · 9.1/10
  • Most featuresBarracuda Cloud Archiving Service · 5 of 5

Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service scores higher on our rubric for enterprise information archiving software: 9.1 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service is the better fit for enterprises archiving email and legacy IM. OpenText InfoArchive is the better fit for enterprises preserving varied historical information.

  • Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service fits best

    Enterprises archiving email and legacy IM

  • OpenText InfoArchive fits best

    Enterprises preserving varied historical information

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service 9.1/10 Visit ↗ OpenText InfoArchive 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 9.0
Ranking #3 in Enterprise Information Archiving Software #4 in Enterprise Information Archiving Software
Best for Enterprises archiving email and legacy IM Enterprises preserving varied historical information
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android Web
Support Email, Phone, Live chat, Community, Docs Docs, Community
Compliance 2FA HIPAA
Integrations 9 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service 5/5 · OpenText InfoArchive 1/5
Email archiving ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Collaboration sources ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Retention controls ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Legal hold ✓ ✓
Search and export ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Retention policies, legal holds, audit trails, and exports support e-discovery.
  • Boolean, full-text, and metadata search with saved searches.
  • Access through web, Outlook add-in, desktop, and mobile apps.
  • Centralizes structured and unstructured information for long-term access
  • Combines event-based retention, legal holds and audit controls
  • Offers cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment options
Cons
  • Pricing is provided through a sales inquiry rather than public per-user rates.
  • Instant-message archiving is limited to supported Lync and Skype for Business versions.
  • Its focus is email and legacy IM rather than a broad range of collaboration sources.
  • Pricing requires contacting OpenText sales
  • Its enterprise focus may not suit smaller organizations
  • Listed support channels are documentation and community
Our verdict

Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service is a cloud-hosted archive for organizations that need to retain, retrieve, and investigate business email. It captures messages through SMTP journaling or direct retrieval from supported email servers,…

Read the review →

OpenText InfoArchive preserves structured and unstructured information in a centralized archive, with a focus on enterprises that need to retain historical records and keep them accessible. Organizations can use it to decommission…

Read the review →
  1. Barracuda Cloud Archiving ServiceEnterprise Information Archiving Software 9.1Pricing on request
  2. OpenText InfoArchiveEnterprise Information Archiving Software 9.0Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service — where it wins

    • Retention policies, legal holds, audit trails, and exports support e-discovery.
    • Boolean, full-text, and metadata search with saved searches.
    • Access through web, Outlook add-in, desktop, and mobile apps.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is provided through a sales inquiry rather than public per-user rates.
    • Instant-message archiving is limited to supported Lync and Skype for Business versions.
    • Its focus is email and legacy IM rather than a broad range of collaboration sources.
  • OpenText InfoArchive — where it wins

    • Centralizes structured and unstructured information for long-term access
    • Combines event-based retention, legal holds and audit controls
    • Offers cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting OpenText sales
    • Its enterprise focus may not suit smaller organizations
    • Listed support channels are documentation and community
  • Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused cloud archive for email compliance, e-discovery, and legacy IM retention.

    Visit BarracudaFull verdict →
  • OpenText InfoArchive9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A centralized archive for enterprise records, retention controls and historical-data access.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update