Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Git Hosting Services

Assembla vs Git

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Assembla #4 in Git Hosting Services 8.4/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Assembla
Git #5 in Git Hosting Services 8.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Git

Assembla leads on 0 checks, Git on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreAssembla · 8.4/10
  • Free planonly Git
  • Free trialonly Assembla
  • Most featuresAssembla · 1 of 3

Assembla scores higher on our rubric for git hosting services: 8.4 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

Git offers free plan; Assembla doesn't.

Assembla is the better fit for teams needing hosting plus project planning. Git is the better fit for developers building self-hosted Git infrastructure.

  • Assembla fits best

    Teams needing hosting plus project planning

  • Git fits best

    Developers building self-hosted Git infrastructure

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Assembla 8.4/10 Visit ↗ Git 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.4 8.2
Ranking #4 in Git Hosting Services #5 in Git Hosting Services
Best for Teams needing hosting plus project planning Developers building self-hosted Git infrastructure
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price $12.50/user/mo Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Phone, Live chat, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Assembla 1/3 · Git 0/3
Built-in CI/CD — Not checked yet
Built-in wiki ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Merge queue Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Artifact storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Git LFS storage 10 GB Not checked yet
SSO support Saml Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Git LFS, file locking, reviews, and branch controls
  • Built-in tickets, wikis, sprints, and milestones
  • REST API plus Jenkins, Slack, Jira, and GitHub integrations
  • Distributed version control with complete local repository history
  • Powerful branching, merging, rebasing, and change-management commands
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with a broad extension ecosystem
Cons
  • No free plan is available
  • No built-in CI/CD workflow engine
  • Starter pricing requires annual billing
  • Primarily a command-line tool rather than a hosted web workspace
  • Hosted reviews, issues, and web administration are outside core Git
  • Large-file handling and file locking require the separate Git LFS extension
Our verdict

Assembla is a managed source-code hosting platform for teams using Git, Git LFS, SVN, or Perforce. Its Git tools cover hosted repositories, merge requests, code review, inline comments, review voting, branch protection, access controls,…

Read the review →

Git is a free, open-source distributed version control system for developers and teams managing software projects from small codebases to very large repositories. It records file changes in local repositories, preserves project history,…

Read the review →
  1. AssemblaGit Hosting Services 8.414-day trial
  2. GitGit Hosting Services 8.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Assembla — where it wins

    • Git LFS, file locking, reviews, and branch controls
    • Built-in tickets, wikis, sprints, and milestones
    • REST API plus Jenkins, Slack, Jira, and GitHub integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan is available
    • No built-in CI/CD workflow engine
    • Starter pricing requires annual billing
  • Git — where it wins

    • Distributed version control with complete local repository history
    • Powerful branching, merging, rebasing, and change-management commands
    • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux with a broad extension ecosystem

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily a command-line tool rather than a hosted web workspace
    • Hosted reviews, issues, and web administration are outside core Git
    • Large-file handling and file locking require the separate Git LFS extension

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update