Head-to-head · Cannabis CRM Software
Alpine IQ vs Sticky
Alpine IQ leads on 0 checks, Sticky on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreAlpine IQ · 9.0/10
Alpine IQ scores higher on our rubric for cannabis crm software: 9.0 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.
Alpine IQ is the better fit for cannabis retailers needing full CRM marketing. Sticky is the better fit for retailers needing advanced journey automation.
- Alpine IQ fits best
Cannabis retailers needing full CRM marketing
- Sticky fits best
Retailers needing advanced journey automation
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Alpine IQ 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Sticky 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Cannabis CRM Software | #7 in Cannabis CRM Software |
| Best for | Cannabis retailers needing full CRM marketing | Retailers needing advanced journey automation |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | Not published |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Support | Email, Phone, Docs | Email, Docs |
| Integrations | 85+ integrations | 18 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Alpine IQ 6/7 · Sticky 6/7 | ||
| Patient profiles | ✓ | ✓ |
| Loyalty programs | ✓ | ✓ |
| SMS marketing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email marketing | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wholesale workflows | Not published | Not published |
| POS integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-location support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Alpine IQ is a cloud platform for cannabis retailers and brands that brings customer profiles, loyalty, marketing automation, analytics, ecommerce and data operations together. Its unified Persona CRM profiles and audience segmentation are… Read the review → |
Sticky is a cannabis-focused CRM and retention marketing platform for dispensaries. It combines POS-derived customer profiles with email, SMS/MMS, wallet notifications, loyalty programs, segmentation and automated journeys. Retailers can… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Alpine IQ — where it wins
- Combines unified profiles, loyalty, SMS and email automation, and segmentation.
- Connects with 85 systems across POS, ecommerce, payments and marketing.
- Supports web, iOS and Android, with branded apps and wallet experiences.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing is defined in individual Service Orders rather than a public price list.
- The breadth of CRM, commerce and data tools may exceed narrower marketing needs.
- Support is available by email, phone and documentation, but not 24/7.
Sticky — where it wins
- Unified profiles combine POS purchases with engagement data.
- Visual journeys support triggers, branches, delays and A/B forks.
- Wallet loyalty, geo-fencing and SKU-level attribution deepen retention marketing.
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires a quote based on store count, volume and channel mix.
- The product is offered through a web platform rather than native apps.
- Support channels are limited to email and documentation.
- Alpine IQ9.0/10 · Pricing on request
A broad cannabis retail CRM combining profiles, loyalty, campaigns and commerce tools.
Visit Alpine IQFull verdict → - Sticky6.9/10 · Pricing on request
Sticky unifies cannabis customer data, compliant messaging, loyalty and automated journeys.
Visit StickyFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Alpine IQ vs Dutchie
- Alpine IQ vs Outfield
- Alpine IQ vs HigherScore
- Alpine IQ vs Salesforce CRM Analytics
- Alpine IQ vs Leafbuyer
- Alpine IQ vs Springbig
- Dutchie vs Sticky
- Outfield vs Sticky
All cannabis CRM software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update


