Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Kodus is the closest open-source, self-hosted replacement for an Elephant-Goldfish-style AI pull-request reviewer. It supports major Git platforms, lets you bring your own model key, and can run on infrastructure you control. PR-Agent is a better fit when review should live inside GitHub Actions, a CLI, or Docker. For dependable merge protection, pair either tool with deterministic analyzers such as reviewdog and Semgrep rather than trusting an LLM alone.
AI-generated patches need two different kinds of scrutiny: model-assisted reasoning about intent, maintainability, and architecture; and repeatable checks for syntax, lint, security, policy, and test failures. The options below are compared on those requirements, plus deployment, model control, licensing, and operational effort.
What should an open-source alternative to Elephant-Goldfish do?
A useful replacement must do more than summarize a diff. It should understand enough repository context to identify risky changes, connect to the team’s code-hosting platform, and fit an approval or CI workflow. Self-hosting matters when source code or prompts cannot be sent to a third-party service, while model choice matters when you need a private endpoint, a particular provider, or predictable spending.
No single category covers every requirement. AI reviewers are good at explaining intent and spotting maintainability problems that rules may miss, but they can be inconsistent. Static analyzers are repeatable and suitable for merge gates, yet they do not understand every design trade-off. The strongest setup uses both.
#1 Best Overall
- Powerful Turbo Fan:CAGIWIRU Electric Air Duster have reached speed up to 130000RPM,Can efficient remove dust and debris.With LED light and Three Adjustable Speed to meet with different cleaning tasks.
- With Attached USB C Fasting Charging cable.Charing 3 hours,Enjoy up to 240 minutes of use on the lowest setting, For third speed can use for 25mins.with four charging options to meet with your needs.
- Wide Application: attached 5 different nozzles,making it suitable for a variety of scenes, such as car,pet, pc, keyboards, and other electronic devices. It also serves for office and home clean duster.
- Handy Design & Portable:Cordless air duster electric nozzle is Light weight and small size, design and comfortable to hold and space saving, convenient to carry around. You can put it in your room or inside the car without taking up space.
- Economical &Reusable: Built durable materials with a long-lasting battery,our CAGIWIRU air duster it's a sustainable alternative to disposable air cans.
- Repository context: Can the tool inspect surrounding files, conventions, and prior changes?
- Platform integration: Does it post comments or checks to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, or another host?
- Deployment and data control: Can your team run it on its own servers, in CI, or with local models?
- Model control: Can you bring your own key or route requests to an OpenAI-compatible endpoint?
- Merge enforcement: Can deterministic findings become required checks instead of suggestions?
- License and operations: What obligations and maintenance work come with self-hosting?
Which tool is the closest self-hosted AI reviewer?
Kodus
Kodus is the strongest match when you want a complete, open-source pull-request reviewer that your organization controls. Its core is AGPL-licensed, and it documents self-hosting with Docker Compose or Helm. You supply the model key, pay the model provider directly at that provider’s list price, and receive unlimited pull-request reviews under that arrangement; there are no seat minimums stated by the vendor.
The project supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and Forgejo. It can run on company infrastructure or in the vendor’s cloud, accepts multiple model providers or OpenAI-compatible endpoints, and offers local CLI and CI/CD workflows. That combination makes it the most flexible choice for teams that want to keep the review service close to their repositories while changing models as requirements evolve.
- Choose it when: you need broad Git-platform coverage, bring-your-own-key operation, and ownership of the runtime.
- Plan for: container or cluster operations, upgrades, secret management, observability, and AGPL compliance.
- Budget for: the infrastructure you run and every model request; the unlimited-review statement does not make inference free.
Hosted-cloud terms and model pricing can change, so verify them before committing a production workflow.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Is PR-Agent better for a CI-first workflow?
PR-Agent
PR-Agent is the practical choice when pull-request review should be a pipeline component rather than a separately operated service. The project is listed under the Apache 2.0 license and supports GitHub Action, command-line, and Docker deployment. Through LiteLLM, it can use different model endpoints, allowing a team to select its provider instead of being locked to one service.
A typical workflow runs the reviewer after a pull request is opened or updated, passes repository and pull-request context to the action or container, and posts comments for human review. Keep credentials in the CI secret store, restrict the token’s repository permissions, and set spending limits at the model endpoint. If a finding must block a merge, enforce that with a separate status check; an AI comment by itself is not a deterministic gate.
- Choose it when: your team already operates GitHub Actions or containerized CI and wants endpoint flexibility.
- Trade-off: you manage prompts, keys, model selection, retries, and usage costs.
- Best companion: reviewdog or a rules-based scanner that converts reliable findings into changed-line comments and required checks.
Can Tabby keep code-review inference inside your network?
Tabby
Tabby is listed as an Apache 2.0, self-hosted option with local-model support. It is relevant when keeping inference inside controlled infrastructure outweighs the convenience of a polished hosted pull-request product. The comparison material treats it as viable with caveats, so expect more integration and tuning work than with a purpose-built review service.
Before selecting it, confirm that the model and hardware you plan to use can handle repository context within an acceptable response time. Also verify how comments, permissions, and pull-request events will connect to your code host. A private model protects source data only if logs, embeddings, caches, and CI artifacts are protected as well.
Rank #2
- Screen Cleaner is Your Screen’s New Bestfriend! - EVEO is proud to present a screen cleaner that’s perfectly suited for your TV. Meet your new screen cleaner, computer screen cleaner, laptop cleaner, iPad cleaner, Macbook,tv cleaner or any other electronic device. Our screen cleaner spray and wipe along with the included plush microfiber cloth, easily removes dust, fingerprints & other smudges on the screen’s surface. Clean effectively for a streak-free screen
- Gentle on your Screens - Our screen cleaner spray and wipes is compatible to be used even for the most sensitive LCD, LED, CRT, and OLED screens in proper use. Be at ease knowing that this product is compatible with all the major brands: LG, SONY, Samsung, Sharp, iPad, iPhone, Android screens, Kindle, PC monitors - we’ve got you covered! Can be used as LCD screen cleaner, tv cleaner, smart tv screen cleaner, and more
- Premium Super Soft Plush Microfiber Cloth - Included in this efficient screen cleaning kit. This screen cleaner spray and wipe has our signature plush microfiber cloth specially designed to comply with screens and monitors and leave them streak-free. Has been shown to effectively absorbs stubborn stains, zero streaks, and no fiber shedding. Always use this together with our screen cleaner for the best results
- Easy-to-Use Screen Cleaner Kit + microfiber cleaning cloth - The EVEO Screen Cleaning Kit will easily be your new favorite tool when it comes to taking care of the things you love most, quick and easy solution for a streak-free screen. Simply screw on the sprayer gun on the screen cleaner bottle. Spray the cleaning liquid onto the microfiber cloth, then wipe the screen until desired cleanliness & shine is achieved.
- Quality Screen Care Kit Worth Purchasing - Enjoy a convenient Screen Cleaner anytime, anywhere you need it. Your satisfaction is our top priority. We stand behind the quality of our products and that’s why, you shouldn’t be worrying at all. We manufacture the Best Screen Cleaner. and can be used for laptop cleaning kit, laptop screen cleaner, tv screen cleaner for smart tv. MacBook screen cleaner, monitor cleaner or screen cleaner spray for electronic devices with microfiber cleaning cloth
What does reviewdog add to an AI-review pipeline?
reviewdog
reviewdog is not an LLM reviewer. It is an MIT-licensed transport and filtering layer that integrates code-analysis tools, limits findings to changed lines, and posts comments or checks to services such as GitHub. The project describes this as a way to connect essentially any analyzer, regardless of programming language, to a code-hosting review.
That makes reviewdog valuable around both AI and non-AI tools. Feed it compiler diagnostics, linters, security scanners, or an AI tool that emits a supported report format. The changed-line filter keeps legacy issues from overwhelming a pull request, while the CI status can remain a stable merge signal. Use the analyzer itself to decide severity; reviewdog should not be treated as proof that a finding is correct.
Where it fits
- Run the analyzer in CI against the pull-request revision.
- Convert its output to the format expected by your review transport.
- Apply changed-line filtering so new work receives attention first.
- Publish comments and a check result to the code host.
- Require the check only for severities your team has validated.
How does Semgrep complement an AI reviewer?
Semgrep
Semgrep is the rules-based security and static-analysis option in this group. The comparison lists its engine as LGPL-2.1 and supports self-hosted CI deployment. Rules can enforce repeatable patterns for security, correctness, and organizational policy without depending on an LLM’s interpretation of a prompt.
Use Semgrep for checks that must be reproducible: unsafe API usage, injection patterns, secrets, prohibited dependencies, or required coding idioms. Let the AI reviewer handle questions such as whether a new abstraction matches the surrounding design or whether an error path is understandable. Feed Semgrep results through reviewdog when you want concise changed-line comments, and configure CI protections for high-confidence rules.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteHow do the leading alternatives compare?
The table separates AI reasoning from deterministic analysis so the deployment and licensing differences are visible.
| Tool | Core approach | Deployment | Model control | License or availability | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kodus | AI pull-request review | Self-hosted with Docker Compose or Helm, or cloud | Bring your own key; multiple providers and OpenAI-compatible endpoints | AGPL core | Closest self-hosted AI reviewer across several Git platforms |
| PR-Agent | AI pull-request automation | GitHub Action, CLI, or Docker | Endpoint flexibility through LiteLLM | Apache 2.0 | CI-first and GitHub-centric teams |
| Tabby | Self-hosted AI coding and review | Self-hosted | Local models supported | Apache 2.0 listed in the comparison | Teams prioritizing private inference |
| reviewdog | Analyzer integration and diff filtering | CI or local execution | Determined by connected analyzers | MIT | Composing linters, scanners, and policy checks |
| Semgrep | Rules-based security and static analysis | Self-hosted CI | Rule-driven | LGPL-2.1 engine listed in the comparison | Security-focused merge gates |
| Hosted AI review service | Vendor-managed AI comments | SaaS | Managed by the provider | Availability and terms vary | Public repositories seeking minimal setup |
A hosted service can be convenient for public projects, but it is not equivalent to running open-source review infrastructure yourself. If source residency, auditability, or model selection is a hard requirement, prefer a self-hosted option and verify every component that handles code.
What infrastructure does self-hosting require?
Self-hosting is a deployment decision, not merely a checkbox in a feature list. At minimum, plan for a runner or host that can execute Docker Compose, Helm, or your chosen CI job; network access to the Git provider’s webhook and API endpoints; persistent configuration and logs; and a protected secret store for model and repository credentials. A Kubernetes deployment also needs an ingress, certificates, resource requests, and a process for rolling upgrades.
Rank #3
- 【Large size】：Measuring 800 x 300 mm/ 31. 5×12 inches, which is wider and taller than others. Large mouse pad can perfectly fit your keyboard and mouse of any size, and there is also ample space for peripherals such as phones, tablets, etc.
- 【LED backlight mouse pad】：Blade Hawks RGB mouse pad provides 7 static modes and 7 dynamic modes will give you the options you are looking for. Power-off memory function remembers the last lighting mode you selected. The super glow fiber Chroma will give you a colorful gaming setup that you want.
- 【Anti-slip rubber base】：Made from Natural rubber, this gaming mousepad will firmly grip your desktop, allowing you to enjoy the ultimate precision in the games you are most passionate about. It also comes with a texture that enhances this ability even further.
- 【Smooth and waterproof surface】: Micro-textured cloth surface, for extremely precise mouse control and a smooth movement. When liquid splashes on the gaming mouse pad, it forms water droplets and slides down. Will not delay your work or gameplay.
- 【Plug and play】: This mouse and keyboard pad is powered by USB, plug and play, no driver required. One button control light modes. Press one time to change the lighting mode, press twice to change the brightness, press and hold about 3 seconds turn ON/OFF.
Configure webhooks to trigger only on the events you need, usually pull-request creation, synchronization, and reopening. Use a dedicated bot identity with read access to source and the smallest write permission needed to publish comments or checks. Test forked pull requests separately: exposing write-capable secrets to an untrusted fork can turn a review job into a credential-exfiltration path.
Operational ownership includes image and dependency updates, backup and restore tests, queue monitoring, and incident response when a provider or model endpoint is unavailable. Pin container tags and action versions instead of silently consuming latest releases. Keep a staging repository where upgrades, webhook payload changes, and permission changes can be tested before production repositories are affected.
What will an open-source review setup cost?
Open-source licensing does not mean zero operating cost. Kodus’s BYOK model moves inference charges to your chosen provider and states that reviews are unlimited under that arrangement, but every review still consumes model tokens. PR-Agent has the same basic economics when it calls a paid endpoint through LiteLLM. Local inference avoids per-request provider billing but requires suitable GPU or CPU capacity, storage, electricity, and engineering time.
Estimate usage from pull-request volume, average diff size, number of files included as context, and the number of reruns caused by new commits. Large generated patches and frequent synchronization events can multiply tokens. Set provider budgets, per-repository limits, maximum context sizes, and retry caps. Skip automated review for documentation-only or bot-generated changes when those events produce little value, while retaining mandatory security and test jobs.
Also account for human review time. A tool that posts dozens of low-confidence comments can cost more than it saves because developers must triage, dismiss, and explain them. Start with advisory comments, measure acceptance and dismissal rates, then tighten prompts, rules, and scope before increasing automation.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
How should you pilot an AI pull-request reviewer?
- Select representative repositories. Include a small service, a larger monorepo, and at least one project with sensitive code or strict policy requirements.
- Record a baseline. Track review latency, escaped defects, security findings, build failures, and the time developers spend reviewing pull requests before automation.
- Run in observation mode. Post comments without blocking merges for several weeks. Have experienced reviewers label findings as valid, useful but non-blocking, duplicate, or incorrect.
- Measure model behavior. Record token usage, response time, timeout frequency, duplicate comments after updates, and the percentage of findings tied to an exact line and reproducible condition.
- Promote only high-confidence checks. Make tests, compilation, and validated Semgrep rules required first. Keep subjective architecture suggestions advisory.
- Review data handling. Confirm retention, telemetry, log access, backups, and deletion procedures for the model endpoint and the review service.
This pilot exposes whether the selected model understands your languages and conventions, whether repository context is affordable, and whether comments arrive quickly enough to fit normal development. It also gives legal and security teams concrete deployment details for license and data reviews.
What common implementation pitfalls should teams avoid?
- Review loops: A bot that reacts to its own comments or check updates can trigger repeated jobs. Filter event actors and record the commit SHA being reviewed.
- Stale findings: Pull-request lines move after each push. Store a stable finding identifier and update or close comments when the code changes.
- Overbroad context: Sending an entire repository increases cost and leakage risk. Start with the diff, related imports, tests, configuration, and documented conventions.
- Untrusted instructions: Treat comments, issue text, and generated files as untrusted input. Prompt-injection text in a repository should not override system policy or reveal secrets.
- Permission mismatches: A reviewer may read code but fail to post checks, or it may receive more write access than necessary. Test permissions with a disposable repository.
- Ignoring generated code: Generated files can create noisy findings. Exclude them where appropriate, but keep checks for the source templates or generators that produce them.
- Blocking on transient outages: Separate required deterministic checks from advisory AI jobs, and define a documented failure policy for model timeouts.
- License ambiguity: Keep license notices and a software bill of materials for deployed images. Ask counsel how AGPL obligations apply to modifications, network access, and distribution.
How should you combine AI review with static analysis?
Use separate jobs with clear responsibilities. The AI job explains design and maintainability risks; deterministic jobs decide whether known rules, tests, or policy checks pass.
Rank #4
- 【Softer and More Comfortable】Vaydeer wrist rest has unique diamond pattern, which is the combination of softness and aesthetics. The materials of wrist rest are improved into higher quality memory foam and covered with silky smooth lycra. The computer wrist rest makes you as comfortable and cushiony as like rest your wrists on clouds.
- 【Ergonomic Wrist Saver】The wrist rests for keyboard and mouse comes with a 17.32×3.15×0.83 inch keyboard wrist pad and a 5.94×3.15×0.83 inch mouse wrist support. Based on ergonomic design, the unique concave shape is the perfect fit for your wrist joints. The wrist rest pad fits most computer keyboards and laptops, improve hand and wrist posture, release your wrist and arm stress.
- 【Non-Slip Rubber Bottom】Featuring an anti-skid silicone base on the bottom, this wrist keyboard support stays firmly in place on your desk, preventing the padding from sliding around, ensuring stable and consistent wrist support during extended computer sessions.
- 【Better Experience & Pain Relief】Our keyboard arm rest is beneficial to alleviate the soreness caused by direct contact and friction between your arm and a hard desk surface, reducing the risk of wrist fatigue or carpal tunnel. The soft texture of memory foam can evenly distribute the pressure around your wrists and provide good support with just enough give.
- 【Helpful in Multiple Scenarios】Whether you're working, studying, writing, typing, gaming, this keyboard and mouse rest combo is an essential accessory to add comfort and support to your hands and wrists. It’s also a great gift for men, women, family, friend, coworker, gamer, teacher, etc.
- Trigger on pull-request events. Run on opening, synchronization, and reopening, with a manual rerun for transient model or network failures.
- Build a controlled context. Provide the diff, relevant repository files, project conventions, and test or build metadata. Avoid sending unrelated secrets or entire repositories by default.
- Run deterministic checks first or in parallel. Execute the compiler, formatter, linter, dependency and security rules, and Semgrep policies. Cache dependencies without exposing credentials.
- Run the AI reviewer. Ask for findings tied to specific lines, explain impact and confidence, and distinguish defects from suggestions. Instruct it not to invent missing requirements.
- Publish through the code host. Use reviewdog for analyzer output when useful, and post AI comments with a bot identity that has the least privilege needed.
- Define merge policy. Require tests and high-confidence security checks. Keep subjective AI suggestions advisory until your team has measured their precision.
- Monitor quality and spend. Track ignored findings, repeat findings, review latency, token usage, and incidents caused by missed or incorrect recommendations.
Which option should you choose?
Choose Kodus if platform coverage and infrastructure ownership matter most
Select Kodus when you need GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, or Forgejo support, want to bring your own model key, and can operate a Docker Compose or Helm deployment. Its AGPL core requires a deliberate license review, especially if you modify and distribute the service.
Choose PR-Agent if your team lives in CI
PR-Agent fits a GitHub-centered organization that wants an action, CLI, or Docker job and prefers to select an endpoint through LiteLLM. It reduces application-integration work but leaves prompt quality, key security, model spend, and reliability in your hands.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Choose Tabby when private, local inference is the priority
Tabby is the candidate to investigate when code cannot leave controlled infrastructure and your team is prepared to tune local models and integrations. Validate hardware capacity and pull-request ergonomics before making it the only reviewer.
Add reviewdog and Semgrep when merges need evidence
Use reviewdog to normalize and focus findings from existing tools, and Semgrep for explicit security and policy rules. They improve an AI workflow by supplying repeatable signals that can be made required checks.
What are the main self-hosting risks?
- License compliance: AGPL software can create source-disclosure and notice obligations when modified versions are conveyed. Ask legal counsel how those rules apply to your deployment and distribution model.
- Secret exposure: Protect model keys, Git tokens, webhook secrets, logs, prompt traces, and CI artifacts. Rotate credentials and grant repository access narrowly.
- Unbounded model cost: Pull-request bursts, repeated updates, and large context windows can multiply usage. Set provider limits and skip low-value events.
- False confidence: A clean AI review does not prove correctness, security, or test coverage. Keep deterministic checks and human ownership for consequential changes.
- Context leakage: Exclude secrets and unrelated proprietary files from prompts, and document retention behavior for every model endpoint.
- Operational drift: Pin images and dependencies, test upgrades in a staging repository, back up configuration, and monitor failed webhooks and queue delays.
What is the bottom-line recommendation?
For the closest open-source, self-hosted AI-review experience, start with Kodus. For a lighter CI component with endpoint choice, start with PR-Agent. Treat reviewdog and Semgrep as complementary infrastructure, not competitors to an LLM: they provide the deterministic checks that make AI-assisted review safe enough to support a real merge policy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does AGPL licensing prevent internal self-hosting?
Not automatically. Internal use is often treated differently from distributing a modified copy, but obligations depend on how the software is modified, accessed, and conveyed; have counsel review the exact deployment.
Can an AI reviewer run without sending code to a public model API?
Yes, if the reviewer supports a local model or a private OpenAI-compatible endpoint and every supporting component is kept inside your network. Check logs, caches, telemetry, and backup systems as well as the inference server.
Best Value
- 【No Drill Mounted】Cable management tray can be assembled in as little as 3 minutes or less-simply. Side clips easily clampe the edge of desk, pass through the holes on the sides, and secure excess cables with baskets. Desk cable management supports inward or outward installation to meet your needs in different scenarios, and provides you with great convenience when collecting and organizing wires.
- 【Rubber Pad Protects Desk】Wire organizer under desk built-in soft rubber pads on the clamp protect your desk from scratches, so you will not damage your furniture or office.
- 【Sturdy and Beautiful】Cord management under desk is made of high-quality carbon steel and holds about 15 lbs. The wire basket has 2 holes on each side of the tray to enable your cables to pass freely. Cable baskets are suitable for desk thickness use from 0.4" to 2.4".
- 【Space Saving & Keep Organized】Desk cable management tray holds all your power cords, outlet strips, USB hubs and computer transformers hidden from your feet, and the data cables will not enter the vacuum cleaner to keep your desk clean and tidy. Desk wire organizer is also suitable for use in the kitchen and outdoors.
- 【Reduce Safety Risks】Cable tray under desk keeps all plugs away from your kids, no more worry about tripping. Using 2 holes wire tray saves extra space, helps you easily cabling and wire protection. The mesh design is not easy to accumulate dust, but avoids safety accidents caused by messy wires.
Should AI comments be required before a pull request can merge?
Usually no at first. Make tests and high-confidence static-analysis rules required, then measure the AI reviewer’s precision and missed defects before promoting any model-generated result to a blocking condition.
How can a team reduce duplicate comments on updated pull requests?
Store a stable identifier for each finding, include file and line context, and suppress or update findings that were already addressed. A changed-line filter also prevents old, untouched issues from resurfacing on every update.
Which option supports GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps as well as GitHub?
Kodus documents support for GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and Forgejo. PR-Agent is most commonly deployed in GitHub-centered workflows, while reviewdog can publish findings wherever its supported integrations and analyzers are configured.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Is bringing your own model key really cheaper?
It can make provider choice and budgeting clearer, but it does not eliminate inference charges. You still pay for tokens, and you also pay for servers, storage, monitoring, and engineering time when self-hosting.
What should happen when the model endpoint is unavailable?
Keep tests and deterministic security checks running and define the AI job as advisory or explicitly fail-open. Retry safely with a cap, report the outage, and provide a manual rerun instead of blocking merges indefinitely.
How do local models affect privacy?
Local inference can keep prompts and source inside your network, but privacy also depends on application logs, caches, embeddings, backups, telemetry, and CI artifacts. Protect and audit every one of those paths.
The Bottom Line
Start with Kodus for the broadest self-hosted AI-review workflow and BYOK model flexibility. Choose PR-Agent when a GitHub Action, CLI, or Docker job is the simplest operational fit. Add reviewdog and Semgrep so reproducible findings, tests, and security policies—not an LLM’s confidence—determine whether a change can merge.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallQuick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
