iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Analytical laboratories are moving data to cloud services because modern instruments generate more information than many small labs can store, process and connect with their existing IT resources. At Pittcon in Chicago, Waters and Thermo Fisher Scientific were among the companies presenting cloud storage, computing, operational software and infrastructure-as-a-service for laboratory work. The goal was not merely remote file storage: vendors were trying to connect instruments, combine steps in the workflow and help analysts obtain useful, reliable results sooner.
The important qualification is that cloud hosting is not an automatic productivity upgrade. A cloud system must work with instruments from different manufacturers, fit the laboratory’s process and preserve data quality. Otherwise, a lab can move its files off-site without making them easier to understand or use.
What “analytical data heads to the cloud” means
The phrase describes a change in emphasis among analytical-instrument companies. Instead of competing only through new hardware, vendors were also promoting software and hosted services that manage the information produced by instruments. The report from Pittcon was published by Chemistry World on 29 March 2017; it is an industry opinion report, not a market-adoption survey, and it does not provide a current percentage of laboratories using cloud systems.
Recommended Free Tools
In a traditional arrangement, an instrument writes files to a computer attached to the instrument or to a laboratory server. Analysts then move those files between applications, storage locations and colleagues. A cloud-oriented arrangement can place some or all of those functions in a remotely managed environment. Depending on the product, that environment may provide:
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
- Cloud storage: a remotely hosted location for instrument files and related records.
- Computing power: processing capacity that can be increased when analytical workloads are heavy.
- Operational software: applications for managing runs, methods, results and laboratory tasks.
- Infrastructure-as-a-service: rented computing and storage infrastructure on which laboratory applications can run.
These pieces are useful only when they are connected to the laboratory’s instruments and procedures. Uploading files is one technical step; turning those files into traceable, reviewable results is the larger objective.
Why instrument makers are paying attention to cloud software
Instrument data is growing faster than some labs’ IT capacity
Modern analytical instruments can produce large volumes of raw and processed information. Smaller laboratories may not have dedicated IT staff to expand servers, maintain specialist software, move data between systems or troubleshoot integrations. Cloud services offer a way to obtain storage and computing resources without every laboratory building and maintaining all of that infrastructure itself.
That does not remove the need for technical decisions. The laboratory still has to define who can access data, which records must be retained, how results are reviewed and how systems connect to instruments. Cloud services change where and how those responsibilities are handled; they do not make the responsibilities disappear.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Laboratories rarely use only one instrument brand
A laboratory may operate equipment from several manufacturers. Each instrument can have its own file formats, control software and data workflow. A system designed around only one vendor may work well for that vendor’s equipment while leaving other instruments outside the process. The result can be manual exports, duplicate records or separate analysis silos.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
For that reason, cross-vendor interoperability is a central test of any cloud proposal. A cloud label alone says nothing about whether the service can receive data from the instruments already in the laboratory, preserve the relevant metadata and return results to the systems that need them.
Vendors can extend their role beyond the instrument
Cloud software lets an instrument maker offer services around the complete analytical workflow rather than around a single device. Storage, computation, method execution, review and reporting can be presented as connected functions. This creates a commercial opportunity for vendors, but it can also reduce the number of separate systems an analyst must operate—provided the connections are genuinely open enough for the laboratory’s equipment mix.
What a cloud workflow can do for a chemistry laboratory
A useful way to understand the proposal is to follow data through a run. The exact screens and features vary by product; the following is a functional model of the capabilities described at Pittcon.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
- Acquire data from an instrument. The instrument produces raw measurements and associated run information. The connection may be direct, through an instrument computer or through an integration layer.
- Store the original record. The service places raw data and relevant metadata in cloud storage so that the working copy is not confined to one instrument workstation.
- Apply computing resources. Processing, calculations or searches can use hosted computing capacity rather than relying entirely on a local laboratory computer.
- Coordinate operational steps. Software can route work, associate files with samples or methods and present tasks for analysts and reviewers.
- Review and interpret results. Analysts use the processed information in the same managed workflow instead of repeatedly copying files between unrelated applications.
- Preserve a usable record. The laboratory retains the raw information, processing context and resulting data together closely enough for later review. The precise retention and audit features are product-specific and were not specified in the 2017 report.
This sequence explains why storage alone is insufficient. If acquisition, processing and review remain disconnected, the laboratory still spends time reconciling files and checking whether the right version was used.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Cloud, local systems and vendor platforms compared
The following comparison is a decision framework, not a performance benchmark. Actual capabilities depend on the product, configuration and instruments in a particular laboratory.
| Approach | Cross-vendor interoperability | Storage and compute scalability | Workflow integration | Analyst productivity and data-quality support | IT staffing burden | Vendor lock-in risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local, separate instrument systems | Often requires manual exchange or custom interfaces; no common capability is established by the source. | Bound by locally purchased and maintained resources. | Frequently split across instrument-specific applications. | Can be effective for a contained workflow, but duplicate handling creates opportunities for error. | Laboratory supplies and maintains the infrastructure. | Depends on file formats, contracts and the ability to export usable data. |
| Single-vendor cloud environment | May be strong for that vendor’s instruments; support for other manufacturers must be verified. | Designed to provide hosted storage and computing, as described for the offerings reported at Pittcon. | Potentially cohesive within the vendor’s software ecosystem. | Potentially faster and more consistent when the workflow fits; no independent productivity figure was reported. | Some infrastructure work shifts to the provider, while local integration and governance remain. | Can increase if proprietary services become central to daily work. |
| Cross-vendor cloud integration layer | Interoperability is the primary objective, but every instrument connection must be tested. | Can combine hosted storage and processing services; capacity and pricing are product-specific. | Can join instruments and applications from different suppliers if interfaces are supported. | Offers the broadest potential benefit, but data-quality controls depend on implementation. | May reduce server administration while increasing the need for integration expertise. | Depends on export options, supported standards and contractual terms. |
Does putting analytical data in the cloud automatically improve analysis?
No. Phillip Broadwith made the limitation explicit in the Chemistry World article: “But simply moving data to ‘the cloud’ does not magically make it more manageable or fruitful.” The sentence remains the key test for cloud proposals. A hosted repository can still contain inconsistent metadata, disconnected instrument files, duplicate results or a workflow that forces analysts to download and re-upload information.
Cloud computing can improve a laboratory’s position when it addresses a specific bottleneck: insufficient local capacity, slow handoffs between instruments and analysts, or fragmented software. It can fail when the provider treats the cloud as a destination rather than as an integrated operating environment. The relevant question is therefore not “Is this in the cloud?” but “Which laboratory task becomes more reliable or less laborious, and how will we verify that?”
How to test cross-vendor interoperability
Interoperability should be demonstrated with the laboratory’s own equipment, not inferred from a product brochure. Use a representative set of instruments, including the brands and software versions that create the most difficult handoffs.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
- Inventory the data sources. List each instrument, its control software, file types, metadata and downstream users. Identify which records are raw, processed, reviewed or reported.
- Map the handoffs. Document where analysts export files, rename them, convert formats, copy results or enter values manually. These are the points at which an integration should save work or reduce risk.
- Ask what the service actually ingests. Request the supported instrument interfaces and file formats in writing. Distinguish native connections from a workflow that merely accepts a manually uploaded file.
- Test metadata preservation. Check whether sample identifiers, methods, timestamps, instrument settings and processing history remain attached to the data after transfer and analysis.
- Run a complete mixed-vendor workflow. Send representative data from more than one manufacturer through acquisition, processing, review and reporting. Confirm that analysts do not need a separate workaround for each brand.
- Verify export and recovery. Determine how the laboratory can retrieve original and processed data in a usable form if it changes providers, loses connectivity or needs an independent review.
- Record exceptions. A system can be useful without supporting every instrument on day one, but unsupported devices and manual steps must be visible in the operating procedure.
Questions to resolve before adopting a cloud laboratory system
Workflow fit
- Which step will the service improve: acquisition, processing, review, reporting or storage?
- Can the proposed workflow represent the laboratory’s sample types, methods and approval stages?
- Will analysts use one interface or continue switching between vendor-specific applications?
Data quality and traceability
- Are raw files retained alongside processed results?
- Can the laboratory identify the method, instrument and processing history associated with a result?
- What happens when a transfer is incomplete, a file is incompatible or a result is reprocessed?
IT and operations
- Which infrastructure tasks move to the provider, and which remain with the laboratory?
- Who configures instrument connections, manages user access and handles failures?
- How does the service operate when an instrument or network connection is unavailable?
Portability and dependence
- Can the laboratory export original data and useful metadata without a proprietary viewer?
- Are interfaces documented well enough to support future instruments from other manufacturers?
- What would it take to move to another provider or return processing locally?
These questions do not assume that one architecture is right for every lab. They expose whether a proposal solves the laboratory’s actual constraints or simply relocates them.
What the 2017 Pittcon report established—and what it did not
The report established that Waters and Thermo Fisher Scientific were promoting cloud-based approaches that combined storage, computing, software and infrastructure services. It also identified the practical drivers: growing analytical data volumes, limited IT capacity in some smaller laboratories and the need to integrate equipment from different manufacturers.
It did not establish a universal adoption rate, a market-size figure, a measured productivity gain or a standard cloud architecture for analytical chemistry. Those figures should not be inferred from the article. The direction it described is best understood as a shift in vendor strategy and laboratory-technology priorities, not as proof that every lab should move all data to a hosted service.
Where cloud services are most likely to help
Small laboratories with limited infrastructure
A lab that cannot easily expand local servers or maintain specialist systems may value hosted storage and computing. The benefit is strongest when the service also reduces routine file handling and provides a coherent workflow; storage by itself leaves much of the operational burden unchanged.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
Multi-instrument facilities
Facilities operating equipment from several manufacturers have the clearest reason to demand integration. A platform that can connect those instruments can reduce isolated data silos, but only if the interfaces preserve the information analysts need and do not force a separate process for each brand.
Workloads that vary over time
Hosted computing can be attractive when analytical processing demand rises and falls rather than remaining constant. The laboratory should still confirm how capacity is provisioned, how costs are calculated and what happens when processing is unavailable; the 2017 report did not specify commercial terms or service guarantees.
Bottom line for laboratories
Analytical data is moving toward cloud services because vendors see a way to address data volume, limited laboratory IT resources and fragmented instrument workflows at the same time. Waters and Thermo Fisher Scientific were already presenting that model at Pittcon in 2017. The sound adoption criterion is not whether a product uses the word cloud. Choose it only when it connects the instruments you actually run, keeps data and processing context usable, improves a defined workflow and leaves the laboratory with a credible path to recover its records.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
