iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Which is the best free AI chatbot? ChatGPT is the best all-round choice for most people at $0 because its free plan combines chat, web search, file and image uploads, data analysis, image creation, voice, memory, and GPTs. Gemini may offer better Google value, Perplexity better sourced research, and Claude better writing or coding.
There is no universal winner. The right choice depends on whether you value answer quality, daily usage, citations, document handling, image tools, ecosystem integration, privacy controls, or avoiding a paywall. A chatbot that produces an excellent answer for five prompts but blocks you afterward may be worse free value than a slightly less capable service with more generous access.
Important qualification: free AI plans change frequently. This comparison is dated August 16, 2026, and limits, models, advertisements, regional availability, and features may differ by account, country, demand, browser, and device.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsKey takeaways
- ChatGPT is the strongest default free AI chatbot because its free plan combines web search, file uploads, data analysis, image generation, voice, memory, and GPTs, although those tools are rate-limited.
- Gemini is the strongest free-value candidate for people who rely on Google services, but current regional limits and feature availability should be checked before choosing it.
- Perplexity is the better free choice for research because it places citations alongside answers, but citations still need to be opened and checked for relevance.
- Claude is a strong choice for careful writing, editing, long documents, and coding, while restrictive or demand-dependent free usage can make it a weaker choice for heavy daily use.
- NotebookLM can outperform general chatbots when the task is to question, summarize, or compare the reader’s own source documents.
- “Free” does not mean unlimited: model caps, tool-specific quotas, peak-time throttling, fallbacks, account requirements, and regional restrictions can all affect the experience.
What does “free AI chatbot” actually mean?
A free AI chatbot should mean a consumer-facing service that can be used without a recurring payment, not a free API allowance, a short trial, or promotional credits. The comparison should also record whether an account or phone number is required, whether the service works in the reader’s country, and what happens after the user reaches a limit.
#1 Best Overall
- Compact Mouse: With a comfortable and contoured shape, this Logitech ambidextrous wireless mouse feels great in either right or left hand and is far superior to a touchpad
- Durable and Reliable: This USB wireless mouse features a line-by-line scroll wheel, up to 1 year of battery life (2) thanks to a smart sleep mode function, and comes with the included AA battery
- Universal Compatibility: Your Logitech mouse works with your Windows PC, Mac, or laptop, so no matter what type of computer you own today or buy tomorrow your mouse will be compatible
- Plug and Play Simplicity: Just plug in the tiny nano USB receiver and start working in seconds with a strong, reliable connection to your wireless computer mouse up to 33 feet / 10 m (5)
- Better than touchpad: Get more done by adding M185 to your laptop; according to a recent study, laptop users who chose this mouse over a touchpad were 50% more productive (3) and worked 30% faster (4)
There are several different kinds of “free” access:
| Type of access | What it means | What to watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Free consumer plan | A website or app can be used without a subscription. | Message, model, tool, speed, or fair-use limits may apply. |
| Free with caps | The service remains available but restricts advanced models or features after usage. | The service may switch to a weaker model or require waiting. |
| Free trial | A paid feature is temporarily available at no cost. | The trial can expire or require payment details. |
| Free API credits | A developer receives limited programmatic usage. | API access is not the same product as a free chatbot website. |
| Free only after sign-in | The service costs nothing but requires an account. | Account, identity, data-retention, and regional policies matter. |
“Unlimited” also needs careful interpretation. A provider may apply fair-use enforcement, peak-demand throttling, daily tool quotas, account verification, model downgrades, or regional restrictions without publishing one permanent message number. A useful comparison reports the observed behavior and the provider’s current wording instead of treating a quota as a lasting promise.
Which free AI chatbot is best overall?
ChatGPT is the best overall free AI chatbot for most people when the priority is one broadly capable app rather than a narrow specialist. OpenAI’s current ChatGPT pricing page lists the Free plan at $0 per month and includes free access to web search, limited access to selected advanced models and deep research, file uploads, data analysis, image generation, voice, memory, and GPT discovery.
OpenAI’s free-tier documentation says limits apply to the model and separately to some tools, including data analysis, file and image uploads, and image creation. OpenAI also says model availability and limits can change. That combination makes ChatGPT broad rather than unlimited: it is an excellent first choice, but not automatically the best choice for a person who spends many hours using one service every day.
ChatGPT’s advantage is breadth. A general user can move from explaining a difficult idea to analyzing a spreadsheet, searching the web, discussing an image, creating an image, or using voice without switching products. The main disadvantage is that advanced access can run out, and the experience after a cap may involve waiting or a different model.
Which chatbot offers the best free value?
Gemini is the strongest free-value candidate for users already invested in Google. Its appeal is not simply model quality; the important advantage is the possibility of combining Gemini with Google-oriented workflows, multimodal work, long-context tasks, and research features. Current access, limits, and integrations vary by account and region, so check Gemini and Google’s AI plan information immediately before publication or purchase.
Gemini is the sensible first alternative to ChatGPT for someone who lives in Gmail, Google Docs, Drive, Android, or other Google services. A standalone chatbot user who does not use those services may find the ecosystem advantage less important. Do not assume that a feature shown in a Google AI plan is included in the no-cost tier.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →How do the main free AI chatbots compare?
The following table compares roles rather than pretending that unlike products have identical plans. Exact quotas and some feature flags are too volatile to state as permanent facts without a same-day account test.
| Service | Best use | What distinguishes it | Free-tier caution |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | General-purpose work | Broad mix of chat, web search, files, analysis, images, voice, memory, and GPTs | Model and tool access is rate-limited |
| Gemini | Google-centric workflows | Google ecosystem integration, multimodal work, and research-oriented features | Availability and limits vary by region, account, and plan |
| Claude | Writing and coding | Strong candidate for prose, editing, long documents, reasoning, and programming | Free usage can be restrictive or demand-dependent |
| Perplexity | Sourced research | Answer-engine design with citations displayed alongside responses | Citations must be checked; research and model access can be capped |
| DeepSeek | Low-paywall experimentation | Often positioned as broadly accessible for cost-conscious users | Privacy, jurisdiction, availability, speed, and policy issues need separate review |
| Copilot | Microsoft users | Value comes from Microsoft and Windows integration | Advanced Microsoft 365 features may require a paid license |
| NotebookLM | Questions about personal sources | Grounds work in documents and sources supplied by the user | It is not a general replacement for open-ended chat or web research |
| Google AI Studio | Developer experimentation | Direct experimentation with Google models and developer-oriented controls | Less approachable than a polished consumer assistant |
| Poe | Trying several models | Multi-model access in one interface | Provider-specific limits and behavior may be less consistent |
| Grok | Real-time or social-platform use | Useful mainly when its platform connections matter to the user | Free access and capabilities should be confirmed in the current account |
| Meta AI | Meta ecosystem use | Relevant to users who want an assistant connected to Meta products | Availability and features vary by country and product |
| Mistral Le Chat | Mistral model access | Alternative from a European AI provider | Consumer tools and limits should be checked on the current service |
| You.com | Search-oriented assistance | Combines conversational responses with search-style workflows | Do not confuse linked sources with verified claims |
| Kimi | Regional alternative | Distinct regional offering and document-oriented use cases | Availability, language performance, and data policies require qualification |
| Qwen | Regional or technical experimentation | Alternative model and chat interface | Current access, policies, and limits vary |
Official starting points for the major services include Anthropic’s pricing information, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, DeepSeek, Meta AI, Mistral Le Chat, NotebookLM, and Google AI Studio.
Rank #2
- The next-generation optical HERO sensor delivers incredible performance and up to 10x the power efficiency over previous generations, with 400 IPS precision and up to 12,000 DPI sensitivity
- Ultra-fast LIGHTSPEED wireless technology gives you a lag-free gaming experience, delivering incredible responsiveness and reliability with 1 ms report rate for competition-level performance
- G305 wireless mouse boasts an incredible 250 hours of continuous gameplay on just 1 AA battery; switch to Endurance mode via Logitech G HUB software and extend battery life up to 9 months
- Wireless does not have to mean heavy, G305 lightweight mouse provides high maneuverability coming in at only 3.4 oz thanks to efficient lightweight mechanical design and ultra-efficient battery usage
- The durable, compact design with built-in nano receiver storage makes G305 not just a great portable desktop mouse, but also a great laptop travel companion, use with a gaming laptop and play anywhere
Which free chatbot is best for research and citations?
Perplexity is the best specialist choice for sourced research because it is designed more like an AI answer engine than a conventional conversational chatbot. Perplexity places citations alongside claims, making it easier to inspect the material used for an answer.
Citations do not prove accuracy. A citation can be outdated, unrelated, inaccessible, low quality, or misread by the chatbot. For important research, open the linked source, check that the source actually makes the cited claim, prefer primary documents, and look for disagreement rather than accepting a single generated summary. Perplexity’s Pro page is the relevant place to check current paid limits and features; the free experience should be evaluated separately.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Which free chatbot is best for writing and coding?
Claude is a leading free choice for writing, editing, long documents, and coding when the quality of the response matters more than maximum daily volume. Claude is particularly relevant for preserving an author’s voice, rewriting carefully, critiquing drafts, explaining code, debugging, and working through ambiguous requirements.
The trade-off is access. Claude’s free usage limits can be restrictive and may depend on demand, so Claude may be the best answer-quality choice for a short session but a poor choice for someone who needs uninterrupted work throughout the day. Check Claude and Anthropic’s pricing page for current terms.
ChatGPT remains a better coding choice for users who also need file analysis, image generation, voice, web search, or a broader collection of tools in the same app. For professional development, a dedicated editor assistant such as GitHub Copilot or Cursor may be more useful than either general chatbot because the assistant is placed inside the coding workflow.
Which free chatbot is best for documents?
NotebookLM is the best fit when answers must be grounded in the reader’s own documents. A student can use it for notes and readings; a worker can use it for reports, policies, or meeting material. The key distinction is that NotebookLM is document-grounded rather than a general-purpose assistant that freely combines the web and its model knowledge.
For general file work, ChatGPT is broader because its free plan includes limited file uploads and data analysis. OpenAI’s free-tier documentation says file and image uploads and data analysis have their own limits, so a successful upload does not guarantee unlimited analysis or that every page, image, footnote, formula, or formatting detail will be handled correctly.
Which free chatbot is best for images and voice?
ChatGPT is the clearest broad recommendation for users who want both image and voice features in a general chatbot. OpenAI lists image generation and voice among the Free plan’s included capabilities, subject to limits. Gemini may be a better fit when image or voice work needs to connect to Google’s ecosystem, but the exact no-cost feature set must be checked in the user’s region and account.
Multimodal claims should be tested with more than one impressive example. Use a chart, a screenshot, a photograph containing text, and a poorly formatted image. Check whether the chatbot distinguishes what it can see from what it is inferring, and whether image creation or analysis consumes a separate quota.
Rank #3
- Compact Mouse: With a comfortable and contoured shape, this Logitech ambidextrous wireless mouse feels great in either right or left hand and is far superior to a touchpad
- Durable and Reliable: This USB wireless mouse features a line-by-line scroll wheel, up to 1 year of battery life (2) thanks to a smart sleep mode function, and comes with the included AA battery
- Universal Compatibility: Your Logitech mouse works with your Windows PC, Mac, or laptop, so no matter what type of computer you own today or buy tomorrow your mouse will be compatible
- Plug and Play Simplicity: Just plug in the tiny nano USB receiver and start working in seconds with a strong, reliable connection to your wireless computer mouse up to 33 feet / 10 m (5)
- Better than touchpad: Get more done by adding M185 to your laptop; according to a recent study, laptop users who chose this mouse over a touchpad were 50% more productive (3) and worked 30% faster (4)
Which free chatbot is best for Google and Microsoft users?
Gemini is the better starting point for Google users, while Copilot is the better starting point for Microsoft users. The recommendation is based on ecosystem convenience, not a claim that either product always produces the best standalone answer.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
| If your work happens mainly in… | Start with… | Why | Qualification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail, Docs, Drive, Android, and Google services | Gemini | Google integration can save copying and switching between apps | Some advanced features may belong to a paid Google AI plan |
| Windows, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Microsoft 365 | Copilot | Microsoft integration can matter more than small differences in chat quality | Advanced Microsoft 365 capabilities may require a separate subscription |
| Personal PDFs, notes, and supplied references | NotebookLM | The workflow is centered on the user’s own sources | It is not a universal open-web chatbot |
Is DeepSeek the best free AI chatbot for heavy use?
DeepSeek is worth considering for users seeking a low-paywall or broadly accessible service, but it is not a risk-free universal winner. Availability, speed, privacy, jurisdiction, data handling, and policy considerations deserve as much attention as answer quality. Review the current DeepSeek privacy policy before entering sensitive information.
“Maximum free usage” is not the same as unlimited reliable access. A service can be inexpensive to use yet unavailable in a reader’s country, slow during demand spikes, subject to changing policies, or unsuitable for confidential work. Do not describe any provider as private, uncensored, or safe without a narrow definition and current evidence.
How should a serious free-chatbot test be designed?
A credible comparison of more than a dozen chatbots needs reproducible tests, not a handful of favorite prompts. The test should use the same prompts, fresh accounts where practical, the same time window, the same country and regional settings, and clearly recorded dates.
- Record the environment: note the test date and time zone, country, browser, operating system, mobile apps, account age, and whether any paid trial was excluded.
- Test comparable products separately: label general chatbots, research engines, document-grounded tools, multi-model aggregators, developer interfaces, and regional services instead of treating them as identical.
- Use task groups: test everyday planning, writing, reasoning, current research, coding, files, images, voice, and error recovery.
- Repeat important prompts: one unusually good or bad answer is not a stable product ranking.
- Check sources: verify whether each citation exists, is relevant, and supports the specific claim.
- Record the failure: note confident factual errors, unsupported citations, formatting failures, lost context, partial file analysis, tool failures, refusal of harmless requests, unsafe compliance, and model changes after a cap.
- Publish raw observations: show representative outputs or concise excerpts without selecting only flattering examples.
What tasks reveal the real differences?
Everyday prompts reveal whether a chatbot can explain a complex idea, plan a constrained trip, turn rough notes into an email, summarize a passage, extract a list, and follow a multi-step instruction. Writing tests should include voice preservation, clarity editing, professional email writing, non-generic headlines, ambiguous briefs, and self-critique followed by revision.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Reasoning tests should ask the chatbot to solve a multi-step logic problem, compare options using stated criteria, identify missing assumptions, correct a deliberately flawed argument, and acknowledge when the prompt lacks enough information.
Research tests should include a time-sensitive fact, a request for sources, conflicting viewpoints, a recent event, and a primary-versus-secondary-source check. Coding tests should cover explanation, debugging, script creation, refactoring, tests, ambiguity, and recovery after an error report.
File and multimodal tests should include a PDF, spreadsheet, chart, screenshot, photograph, and poorly formatted material. Test whether the system silently ignores pages, images, footnotes, spreadsheet formulas, or embedded content. Safety prompts should test uncertainty, context-gathering, refusal quality, fabricated citations, false claims about completed actions, and resistance to prompt injection—not solicit professional medical, legal, or financial advice.
How should free AI chatbots be scored?
A transparent weighted score should distinguish capability from availability. A generous quota should not automatically defeat a much more capable chatbot, and a brilliant one-off response should not automatically defeat a service that users can access reliably all day.
Rank #4
- Computer mouse for easily navigating a computer interface; click, scroll, and more
- USB-A wired connection; if existing device only supports USB-C, an additional adapter will be required
- High-definition (1000 dpi) optical tracking ensures responsive cursor control for precise tracking and easy text selection
- 3 buttons offer effortless fingertip control
- Plug-and-go ready for instant use
| Criterion | Suggested weight | What to measure |
|---|---|---|
| Answer quality | 25% | Usefulness, clarity, reasoning, writing quality, and completeness |
| Factual accuracy and source quality | 20% | Correctness, source relevance, citation support, and uncertainty |
| Instruction following | 15% | Format, constraints, tone, and multi-step compliance |
| Free-tier generosity | 15% | Access, caps, fallbacks, tool quotas, and behavior after limits |
| Speed and reliability | 10% | Response consistency, outages, latency, and peak-time behavior |
| Features and multimodality | 10% | Files, images, voice, web tools, memory, and custom assistants |
| Privacy and account friction | 5% | Sign-in requirements, controls, retention information, and setup friction |
Publish separate scores for capability, free access, research, writing, coding, files, images and voice, privacy, and reliability. A single overall ranking hides exactly the trade-offs that matter most to free users.
What happens after you hit a free limit?
After a user reaches a free limit, the service may make the user wait, restrict the advanced model, switch to a fallback model, disable a tool, apply a separate quota, request account verification, or display a paid upgrade. The result can differ by model, tool, account, region, and current demand.
OpenAI says free users are notified when they reach current model limits, and its documentation describes separate limits for some tools. OpenAI also lists ChatGPT Plus at $20 per month, billed monthly, while the pricing page lists ChatGPT Pro at $200 per month. Prices and plan contents can change, so use the linked official page for the current offer.
OpenAI says free-tier advertising tests began in the United States on February 9, 2026, with availability and controls varying by region and account. The relevant details are in OpenAI’s advertising information. Ads are another reason that “free” should be evaluated as an experience, not just a price.
How private are free AI chatbots?
No consumer free chatbot should be treated as automatically confidential. Privacy depends on whether chats are used for model improvement, whether training can be disabled, retention periods, temporary-chat controls, human review, account requirements, data location, governing jurisdiction, file retention, and the difference between consumer and enterprise policies.
Do not paste passwords, private keys, confidential business information, sensitive medical records, or unpublished work into a consumer chatbot unless you have reviewed the provider’s current terms and settings. OpenAI says Temporary Chat does not appear in history, does not create memories, and is not used to train models; that is a specific control, not proof that every ChatGPT interaction has the same treatment. Review the ChatGPT FAQ and data-control information before using sensitive material.
Privacy should be reported as a set of documented controls and risks, not as a simplistic ranking. A provider’s country, data location, policy language, training settings, and consumer-versus-business terms can all change the answer.
Which free AI chatbot should you choose?
| Your priority | Best starting choice | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| One app for almost everything | ChatGPT | Broadest combination of general chat and multimodal tools |
| Google-centered productivity | Gemini | Google ecosystem integration is the main advantage |
| Careful writing or coding | Claude | Strong candidate for prose, editing, long documents, and programming |
| Current research with visible sources | Perplexity | Citations appear directly alongside answer claims |
| Questions about your own sources | NotebookLM | Document-grounded workflow is more suitable than open-ended chat |
| Windows or Microsoft 365 work | Copilot | Microsoft integration can outweigh standalone model differences |
| Low-paywall experimentation | DeepSeek | Potentially generous access, balanced against privacy and jurisdiction concerns |
| Several models in one interface | Poe | Convenient for comparison, with less consistent provider-specific behavior |
Start with ChatGPT if you want one general assistant and do not have a strong ecosystem preference. Choose Gemini if Google integration affects your daily work, Claude if writing or code quality dominates, Perplexity if source inspection is central, NotebookLM if your work begins with your own documents, and Copilot if Microsoft 365 is where your work already happens.
Recommended Free Tools
When should you pay for an AI chatbot?
Pay for an AI chatbot when free limits repeatedly interrupt work, when you need frequent file analysis or research, when higher-quality reasoning or coding saves meaningful time, or when a Google or Microsoft integration is worth the subscription. Paying does not make generated answers automatically accurate.
Best Value
- 【Plug and Play for Home/Office/School】The wireless computer mouse features 2.4GHz connectivity, delivering a stable, interference-free connection up to 32ft. Designed for 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬, it ensures comfortable use all day. Simply plug in the USB-A receiver for instant pairing—no drivers needed. 📌📌 If the mouse isn’t suitable, place the USB receiver in the battery compartment and return both.
- 【3 Levels Adjustable DPI】This travel USB mouse offers 3 adjustable DPI settings (800, 1200, 1600), allowing you to customize sensitivity for precise design work. Effortlessly switch to match your task and elevate your productivity. 📌 Please remove the film at the bottom of the mouse before use.
- 【Effortless Browsing】Equipped with forward and backward buttons, this computer mice streamlines your workflow, making it easy to navigate through web pages and files with a simple click. 📌Side button does not work on Mac.
- 【Visible Indicator Light】 The pc mouse features a visual indicator for DPI levels and low battery alerts. The red light flashes once for 800 DPI, twice for 1200 DPI, and three times for 1600 DPI. When the battery level is below 10%, the light flashes red until the mouse is completely out of power.
- 【Click to Wake】With smart sleep mode, it saves power by standby after 10 inactive minutes, just 2-3 clicks to wake. This efficient design delivers 3x longer battery life than motion-wake mice. Engineered for durability, its buttons and scroll wheel are tested for 10 million clicks, ensuring long-term reliability and consistent performance.
ChatGPT Plus is a relevant upgrade for users who want higher limits and broader access to voice, image generation, file analysis, deep research, and custom GPT creation; OpenAI lists it at $20 per month. Perplexity Pro is the more natural upgrade for research-heavy users, while Google AI and Microsoft 365 plans are more relevant when the productivity-suite integration is the reason to upgrade.
Developers should compare a general subscription with a workflow-specific tool. Cursor and GitHub Copilot may be more useful for daily software development because they operate in or beside the editor. Users who ask only occasional basic questions should not pay simply because a comparison page presents a premium plan.
Final verdict
ChatGPT is the best free AI chatbot for most people, but it is not the best free tool for every job. Gemini is the strongest ecosystem alternative, Claude is a leading writing and coding choice, Perplexity is the research specialist, NotebookLM is the document specialist, Copilot is the Microsoft specialist, and DeepSeek is a candidate for users prioritizing low-paywall access who accept additional privacy, jurisdiction, and reliability questions.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallThe most honest ranking is therefore conditional. Choose the chatbot that combines acceptable answer quality with limits you can live with, tools you will actually use, a privacy policy you understand, and an ecosystem that reduces friction. Recheck the plan page and test the free account on the exact tasks that matter before treating any August 2026 ranking as permanent.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ChatGPT really free to use?
ChatGPT has a Free plan priced at $0 per month, but OpenAI applies limits to model usage and some tools, including file and image uploads, data analysis, and image creation. Free access is therefore not the same as unlimited access.
Which free AI chatbot is best for research?
Perplexity is the strongest specialist choice for research because it places citations alongside answers. Users should still open the cited pages and verify that each source supports the specific claim.
Which free AI chatbot is best for writing?
Claude is a leading choice for careful prose, editing, long documents, and coding, although its free usage limits can be restrictive or demand-dependent. ChatGPT is the broader choice when writing is only one of several needs.
Is NotebookLM a general-purpose chatbot?
NotebookLM is primarily a document-grounded assistant for questioning, summarizing, and comparing user-supplied sources. It can be better than a general chatbot for source-based work but is not a complete replacement for open-ended web research.
Should I enter confidential information into a free AI chatbot?
You should not enter passwords, private keys, confidential business information, sensitive medical records, or unpublished material into a consumer free chatbot unless you have reviewed the provider’s current privacy terms and controls. Free consumer plans should not be assumed to provide enterprise-grade confidentiality.
The Bottom Line
Bottom line: Start with ChatGPT for the broadest free experience, Gemini for Google workflows, Claude for writing and coding, Perplexity for cited research, NotebookLM for your own documents, and Copilot for Microsoft 365. Treat every free plan as changeable, capped, and subject to regional conditions.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
