Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best OWASP dep-scan Alternatives in 2026

Free#22 of 65 in Software Composition Analysis Software

The top OWASP dep-scan alternatives are Snyk Open Source, FOSSA and Safeguard SCA: 15 software composition analysis software our editors would look at instead of OWASP dep-scan, in our ranking order.

7.1/10Editor score
Visit OWASP dep-scan
OWASP dep-scan7.1 Visit OWASP dep-scan

OWASP dep-scan: A broad self-hosted scanner for teams that want open-source dependency and container analysis. Where it falls short: integration coverage centers on CycloneDX cdxgen and GitHub security advisory.

Switching from OWASP dep-scan? For most software composition analysis software buyers the best OWASP dep-scan alternative is Snyk Open Source, built for teams wanting broad SCA coverage. On a budget, Safeguard SCA starts at $9/mo. Semgrep Supply Chain offers the most monitored projects (500 projects).

Why People Look for an OWASP dep-scan Alternative

  • Integration coverage centers on CycloneDX cdxgen and GitHub Security Advisory
  • Pull-request scanning is not established by the published product details
  • Its broad scope may require more operational ownership than narrower tools

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 OWASP dep-scan Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Snyk Open Source

    Best forTeams wanting broad SCA coverage

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 9.4 vs 7.1

    Broad SCA coverage with reachability, SBOMs, pull-request scanning, and monitoring.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our Snyk Open Source verdict → Visit Snyk
    9.4/10★★★★★
    Visit Snyk
  2. FOSSA

    Best forHybrid teams needing mature SCA

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 9.3 vs 7.1

    A mature SCA platform covering dependencies, SBOMs, containers, licenses, and policy controls.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our FOSSA verdict → Visit FOSSA
    9.3/10★★★★★
    Visit FOSSA
  3. Safeguard SCA

    Best forBudget-conscious teams needing remediation

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 9.1 vs 7.1

    A budget-conscious SCA platform with reachability analysis, SBOMs, and remediation workflows.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our Safeguard SCA verdict → Visit Safeguard SCA
    9.1/10★★★★★
    Visit Safeguard SCA
  4. Black Duck SCA

    Best forLarge enterprises needing broad analysis

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.9 vs 7.1

    Broad SCA coverage for enterprises managing open-source risk across the SDLC.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Pricing on request Our Black Duck SCA verdict → Visit Black Duck
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Black Duck
  5. Endor Labs

    Best forTeams prioritizing reachability and risk

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.8 vs 7.1

    A broad SCA platform for teams that need reachability and risk-based prioritization.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan · pricing on request Our Endor Labs verdict → Visit Endor Labs
    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Endor Labs
  6. Semgrep Supply Chain

    Best forDeveloper teams needing code-aware SCA

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.7 vs 7.1

    A developer-focused SCA tool combining reachability, SBOMs, detection, and upgrade automation.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our Semgrep Supply Chain verdict → Visit Semgrep
    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit Semgrep
  7. Socket

    Best forTeams focused on malicious packages

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.6 vs 7.1

    A focused SCA platform for detecting malicious packages and dependency risk.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our Socket verdict → Visit Socket
    8.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Socket
  8. Mend SCA

    Best forEnterprises needing hybrid SCA

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 7.1

    A hybrid SCA platform combining dependency risk analysis, SBOM, reachability, and remediation.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Our Mend SCA verdict → Visit Mend.io
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Mend.io
  9. Sonatype Lifecycle

    Best forMature policy-driven organizations

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.4 vs 7.1

    A policy-driven SCA platform with reachability, SBOMs, remediation, and broad ecosystem coverage.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Pricing on request Our Sonatype Lifecycle verdict → Visit Sonatype
    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit Sonatype
  10. Checkmarx SCA

    Best forOrganizations needing exploitable-path analysis

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.3 vs 7.1

    A broad SCA platform for teams prioritizing reachability and policy automation.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Pricing on request Our Checkmarx SCA verdict → Visit Checkmarx
    8.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Checkmarx
  11. Veracode SCA

    Best forTeams using a broader AppSec platform

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.2 vs 7.1

    A broad SCA toolkit for teams already working across an AppSec platform.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Pricing on request Our Veracode SCA verdict → Visit Veracode
    8.2/10★★★★☆
    Visit Veracode
  12. OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis

    Best forOrganizations wanting established vendor backing

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.1 vs 7.1

    A broad SCA platform with free access, enterprise controls, and sales-led pricing.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our OpenText Fortify Software Composition Analysis verdict → Visit OpenText
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit OpenText
  13. Xygeni

    Best forTeams wanting free broad SCA coverage

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 8.0 vs 7.1

    Broad SCA coverage with a free tier and deeper controls across paid plans.

    • Reachability analysis
    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan Our Xygeni verdict → Visit Xygeni
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Xygeni
  14. ReversingLabs Spectra Assure

    Best forOrganizations prioritizing software supply-chain threats

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 7.9 vs 7.1

    A threat-focused SCA platform spanning package analysis, SBOMs, and CI/CD controls.

    • Reachability analysis
    • SBOM generation
    Free plan · 14-day trial Our ReversingLabs Spectra Assure verdict → Visit ReversingLabs
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit ReversingLabs
  15. FossID Workbench

    Best forTeams needing source and snippet analysis

    • Better than OWASP dep-scan:
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 7.1

    A broad SCA platform for source, dependency, license, and SBOM workflows.

    • Pull request scanning
    • SBOM generation
    Pricing on request Our FossID Workbench verdict → Visit FossID
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit FossID

OWASP dep-scan Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to OWASP dep-scan?

Snyk Open Source: #1 in our Software Composition Analysis Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.4 out of 10. Broad SCA coverage with reachability, SBOMs, pull-request scanning, and monitoring.

Is there a free alternative to OWASP dep-scan?

Yes. Snyk Open Source, FOSSA, Safeguard SCA, Endor Labs and Semgrep Supply Chain have a free plan or a free tier (9 of the 15 alternatives on this page).

What is the cheapest paid alternative to OWASP dep-scan?

Of the alternatives here that publish a price, Safeguard SCA starts lowest, at $9/mo.

Why do people look for OWASP dep-scan alternatives?

Integration coverage centers on CycloneDX cdxgen and GitHub Security Advisory; Pull-request scanning is not established by the published product details; Its broad scope may require more operational ownership than narrower tools.

Which OWASP dep-scan alternative has the most monitored projects?

Semgrep Supply Chain, with 500 projects.

How do I switch from OWASP dep-scan?

Export your data from OWASP dep-scan (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel OWASP dep-scan.

How to Switch from OWASP dep-scan

  1. Export your data from OWASP dep-scan (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel OWASP dep-scan.

OWASP dep-scan vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromSupported ecosystemsSBOM generationReachability analysisPull request scanningScore
22OWASP dep-scanYesFreeNode.js, Java/JVM, PHP, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, .NET, Dart, Haskell, Elixir, C/C++, Clojure, Docker/OCI, GitHub Actions, Jenkins, YAML manifestsYesYes7.1
1Snyk Open SourceYes$25/user/moC/C++, Dart/Flutter, Elixir, Go, Java/Kotlin, JavaScript, .NET, PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust (limited), Scala, Swift/Objective-C, TypeScript; npm, pnpm, Yarn, Maven, Gradle, Pip, Poetry, pipenv and setup.pyYesYesYes9.4
2FOSSAYes$20/site/moJavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, PerlYesYesYes9.3
3Safeguard SCAYes$9/monpm, PyPI, Maven, Gradle, Go modules, Cargo, RubyGems, Composer, NuGet, HexYesYesYes9.1
4Black Duck SCABitBake, Cargo, Carthage, CocoaPods, Conan, Conda, CPAN, CRAN, Dart, Go, Gradle, Hex, Ivy, Lerna, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PEAR, pip, pnpm, Poetry, RubyGems, SBT, Setuptools, Swift, Yarn, Xcode, OPAM, UV, RushYesYesYes8.9
5Endor LabsYesC/C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Kotlin, .NET (C#), PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala, Swift, TypeScript, BazelYesYesYes8.8
6Semgrep Supply ChainYes$30/user/moC# (NuGet); Dart (Pub); Go (Go modules); Java (Gradle, Maven); JavaScript/TypeScript (npm, Yarn, pnpm); Kotlin (Gradle, Maven); PHP (Composer); Python (pip, pip-tool, Pipenv, Poetry); Ruby (RubyGems); Rust (Cargo); Scala (Maven); Swift (SwiftPM)YesYesYes8.7
7SocketYes$25/user/moJavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Ruby, .NET, Scala, Kotlin, Rust, PHP, Swift, C/C++, Julia, Dart, Elixir/Erlang, GitHub ActionsYesYesYes8.6
8Mend SCANo$1,000/user/yrC/C++/Conan, C#/.NET/NuGet, Go, Java/Maven/Gradle, JavaScript/npm/yarn/pnpm, PHP/Composer, Python/pip/Poetry/Conda/uv, Ruby/Bundler, Scala/sbt, Swift/SwiftPM/CocoaPods, Rust/Cargo, Haskell/Cabal, Elixir/Erlang/Hex, Bazel, OCamlYesYesYes8.5
9Sonatype LifecycleNoC++/Conan; Conda; Dart and Flutter/pub; Go/Go Modules; Hugging Face; Java/Maven, Gradle, Ivy; JavaScript/npm, yarn; .NET/NuGet; Objective-C/CocoaPods; PHP/Composer; Python/PyPI, Poetry, pipenv; R/CRAN; RPM/Yum and Fedora EPEL; Ruby/RubyGems and Bundler; Rust/Cargo; Swift/SwiftYesYesYes8.4
10Checkmarx SCANoJava/Maven, JavaScript/TypeScript/NPM, .NET/NuGet, Python/PIP, PHP/Composer, Swift/iOS, Go, Ruby, C/C++/Conan, Unity, Perl/CPAN, Dart/PubYesYesYes8.3
11Veracode SCAC#/.NET (DLL, NuGet); C/C++ (Make); Go (Dep, Glide, go get, Go modules, GoDep, GoVendor, Trash); Java (Ant, Gradle, JARs, Maven); JavaScript (Bower, NPM, Yarn); Kotlin (Gradle, JARs, Maven); Objective-C (CocoaPods); PHP (Composer); Python (pip, Pipenv, Poetry); Ruby (Bundler); Scala (JARs, SBT); Swift (CocoaPods); TypeScript (Bower, NPM, Yarn)YesYesYes8.2
12OpenText Fortify Software Composition AnalysisYesC# / NuGet / Paket; Go / Go Modules / Go Dep / Bazel; Java and Kotlin / Gradle / Maven / Bazel; JavaScript / NPM / Yarn / Bower; Objective-C / CocoaPods; PHP / Composer; Python / Pip / Pipenv / UV / Poetry; Ruby / RubyGems; Rust / Cargo; Swift / CocoaPods; Scala / SBTYesYesYes8.1
13XygeniYesMaven, Gradle, npm, Yarn, Bower, .NET, Go, Python/Pip, PHP/Composer, Ruby, Dart/FlutterYesYesYes8.0
14ReversingLabs Spectra AssureYes$500/monpm, PyPI, RubyGems, NuGet, VS Code, PS Gallery, Docker, Amazon ECR, Hugging Face, Maven, Windows, Linux, macOS, containers, virtual machinesYesYes7.9
15FossID WorkbenchJavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBTYesYes7.8

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update