Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best GitLab Merge Trains Alternatives in 2026

#6 of 26 in Merge Queue Software

The top GitLab Merge Trains alternatives are Mergify, Bitbucket and Prow: 15 merge queue software our editors would look at instead of GitLab Merge Trains, in our ranking order.

7.7/10Editor score
GitLab Merge Trains7.7 Visit GitLab

GitLab Merge Trains: Parallel merge-train pipelines help GitLab teams validate queued changes in sequence. Where it falls short: requires GitLab premium or ultimate.

Switching from GitLab Merge Trains? For most merge queue software buyers the best GitLab Merge Trains alternative is Mergify, built for teams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools. On a budget, GitHub Merge Queue starts at $4/user/mo, against $29/user/mo for GitLab Merge Trains.

Why People Look for a GitLab Merge Trains Alternative

  • Requires GitLab Premium or Ultimate
  • Premium starts at $29 per user per month with annual billing
  • Designed for GitLab rather than GitHub or Bitbucket workflows
  • No free plan — 10 of the alternatives below have it
  • No gitHub support — 9 of the alternatives below have it

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 GitLab Merge Trains Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Mergify

    Best forTeams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • Paid from: $21/mo vs $29/mo
    • Editor score 8.9 vs 7.7

    Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.

    Free plan · 14-day trial Our Mergify verdict → Visit Mergify
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Mergify
  2. Bitbucket

    Best forTeams already using Bitbucket and Pipelines

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 7.7

    A practical fit for Bitbucket teams that want merge queues alongside code hosting and CI/CD.

    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Bitbucket
  3. Prow

    Best forOrganizations running self-hosted GitHub CI on Kubernetes

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Editor score 8.1 vs 7.7

    Self-hosted CI and pull-request merge automation for teams running Kubernetes.

    Open source Our Prow verdict → Visit Prow
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Prow
  4. Best forTeams needing batch validation and stack-aware queues

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • GitHub support
    • Editor score 7.9 vs 7.7

    A stack-aware queue that batches CI checks and keeps unrelated pull requests moving.

    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Trunk
  5. Best forTeams needing configurable queues across CI providers

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • GitHub support
    • Paid from: $20/mo vs $29/mo
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 7.7

    Configurable GitHub merge queues with batch validation and CI-provider integrations.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Aviator
  6. Best forGitHub teams wanting built-in FIFO merge validation

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • GitHub support
    • Paid from: $4/mo vs $29/mo

    A GitHub-native FIFO queue for validating grouped pull requests before merging.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    Free plan · 30-day trial Our GitHub Merge Queue verdict → Visit GitHub
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit GitHub
  7. Marge-bot

    Best forGitLab teams wanting free, self-hosted batch testing

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan

    A GitLab-only merge bot for teams that want self-hosted CI and approval gates.

    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Marge-bot
  8. DeployBot

    Best forSmall teams coordinating merges with deployment checks

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • GitHub support

    A self-hosted GitHub merge queue that coordinates reviewed commits with deployment checks.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit DeployBot
  9. Best forTeams merging stacked PRs as atomic batches

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • GitHub support

    Queues stacked GitHub pull requests by branch and merges validated batches atomically.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.3/10★★★★☆
    View on GitHub
  10. Best forLarge teams building speculative validation workflows

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • GitHub support

    An open-source, self-hosted queue that validates parallel changes against predicted branch states.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.2/10★★★★☆
    Try Uber SubmitQueue
  11. gitea-mq

    Best forGitea or GitHub teams wanting open-source batch queues

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan
    • GitHub support

    An open-source queue that validates pull requests in batches before they merge.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit gitea-mq
  12. Shunt

    Best forForgejo or Gitea teams needing batch CI validation

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • Free plan

    Batches Forgejo and Gitea pull requests for combined CI validation and failure isolation.

    • Batch validation
    Free plan Our Shunt verdict → Visit Shunt
    7.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Shunt
  13. Best forGitHub teams wanting a simple self-hosted FIFO queue

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • GitHub support

    A focused FIFO queue for GitHub teams that want to manage merges on their own infrastructure.

    • GitHub support
    6.9/10★★★☆☆
    Visit site
  14. Best forGitLab teams wanting a self-hosted FIFO merge bot

    A self-hosted GitLab bot that queues, rebases, and merges requests serially.

    • GitLab support
    6.8/10★★★☆☆
    Visit site
  15. Anubis

    Best forSmall GitHub teams wanting guarded sequential merges

    • Better than GitLab Merge Trains:
    • GitHub support

    An open-source GitHub bot for teams that want guarded, sequential merges.

    • GitHub support
    Open source Our Anubis verdict → Visit Anubis
    6.7/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Anubis

GitLab Merge Trains Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to GitLab Merge Trains?

Mergify: #1 in our Merge Queue Software ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.

Is there a free alternative to GitLab Merge Trains?

Yes. Mergify, Bitbucket, Prow, Trunk Merge Queue and GitHub Merge Queue have a free plan or a free tier (14 of the 15 alternatives on this page).

What is the cheapest paid alternative to GitLab Merge Trains?

Of the alternatives here that publish a price, GitHub Merge Queue starts lowest, at $4/user/mo.

Why do people look for GitLab Merge Trains alternatives?

Requires GitLab Premium or Ultimate; Premium starts at $29 per user per month with annual billing; Designed for GitLab rather than GitHub or Bitbucket workflows.

How do I switch from GitLab Merge Trains?

Export your data from GitLab Merge Trains (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel GitLab Merge Trains.

How to Switch from GitLab Merge Trains

  1. Export your data from GitLab Merge Trains (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel GitLab Merge Trains.

GitLab Merge Trains vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromGitHub supportBatch validationMerge trainsDeployment modelScore
6GitLab Merge TrainsNo$29/user/moNoYesYesHybrid7.7
1MergifyYes$21/seat/mo8.9
2BitbucketYes8.5
3ProwFree8.1
4Trunk Merge QueueYesYesYesHybrid7.9
5Aviator MergeQueueNo$20/user/moYesYesNoHybrid7.8
6GitHub Merge QueueYes$4/user/moYesYesNoCloud7.6
7Marge-botYesFreeNoYesNoSelf_hosted7.5
8DeployBotYesFreeYesYesNoSelf_hosted7.4
9Merge Queue for Stacked PRsYesFreeYesYesSelf_hosted7.3
10Uber SubmitQueueYesFreeYesYesNoSelf_hosted7.2
11gitea-mqYesFreeYesYesNoSelf_hosted7.1
12ShuntYesFreeNoYesNoSelf_hosted7.0
13Build-Flow Labs Merge QueueFreeYesNoNoSelf_hosted6.9
14GitLab Merger BotFreeNoNoNoSelf_hosted6.8
15AnubisFreeYesNoNoSelf_hosted6.7

Head-to-Head

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update