The Best Merge Queue Software in 2026
Mergify is the pick: it combines merge queues and stacked pull requests with test-health monitoring that spots unreliable tests and can isolate them automatically. Mergify is the best free option: its free plan allows up to five users when repositories are private, while GitHub Merge Queue, part of GitHub's Team plan, is the cheapest paid option at $4 per user a month. For teams that need CI-aware queueing, Mergify links to GitHub and many CI systems. Aviator MergeQueue fits teams coordinating several CI providers because it supports sequential or parallel queues, configurable batches, and can rerun unsuccessful batches to narrow down the culprit. It connects with GitHub Actions and Jenkins, helping when one queue spans providers. Prow suits organizations operating their own GitHub automation in Kubernetes, scheduling checks before and after changes plus recurring jobs. Operations get queue status, metric export and structured logging. The like-for-like starting-price range is from $4 per user a month (GitHub Merge Queue) to $21 per seat a month (Mergify).
Our top picks
-
Top ranked
Mergify#1 of 268.9/10Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.
Free plan · 14-day trial
-
Runner-up
Bitbucket#2 of 268.5/10A practical fit for Bitbucket teams that want merge queues alongside code hosting and CI/CD.
Free plan
-
Top-ranked free plan
Trunk Merge Queue#4 of 267.9/10A stack-aware queue that batches CI checks and keeps unrelated pull requests moving.
Free plan
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
The full ranking 26 tools, best first
-
Best forTeams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools
Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.
Free plan · 14-day trial Our Mergify verdict → Visit MergifyFor vendors Sponsor this spot · #1 · $149/mo →8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Mergify -
Best forTeams already using Bitbucket and Pipelines
A practical fit for Bitbucket teams that want merge queues alongside code hosting and CI/CD.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forOrganizations running self-hosted GitHub CI on Kubernetes
Self-hosted CI and pull-request merge automation for teams running Kubernetes.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Prow -
Best forTeams needing batch validation and stack-aware queues
A stack-aware queue that batches CI checks and keeps unrelated pull requests moving.
- GitLab support
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit Trunk -
Best forTeams needing configurable queues across CI providers
Configurable GitHub merge queues with batch validation and CI-provider integrations.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Aviator -
Best forGitLab teams running parallel merge-train pipelines
Parallel merge-train pipelines help GitLab teams validate queued changes in sequence.
- Merge trains
- GitLab support
- Batch validation
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit GitLab -
Best forGitHub teams wanting built-in FIFO merge validation
A GitHub-native FIFO queue for validating grouped pull requests before merging.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitHub -
Best forGitLab teams wanting free, self-hosted batch testing
A GitLab-only merge bot for teams that want self-hosted CI and approval gates.
- GitLab support
- Batch validation
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit Marge-bot -
Best forSmall teams coordinating merges with deployment checks
A self-hosted GitHub merge queue that coordinates reviewed commits with deployment checks.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit DeployBot -
Best forTeams merging stacked PRs as atomic batches
Queues stacked GitHub pull requests by branch and merges validated batches atomically.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.3/10★★★★☆View on GitHub -
Best forLarge teams building speculative validation workflows
An open-source, self-hosted queue that validates parallel changes against predicted branch states.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.2/10★★★★☆Try Uber SubmitQueue -
Best forGitea or GitHub teams wanting open-source batch queues
An open-source queue that validates pull requests in batches before they merge.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.1/10★★★★☆Visit gitea-mq -
Best forForgejo or Gitea teams needing batch CI validation
Batches Forgejo and Gitea pull requests for combined CI validation and failure isolation.
- Batch validation
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit Shunt -
Best forGitHub teams wanting a simple self-hosted FIFO queue
A focused FIFO queue for GitHub teams that want to manage merges on their own infrastructure.
- GitHub support
6.9/10★★★☆☆Visit site -
Best forGitLab teams wanting a self-hosted FIFO merge bot
A self-hosted GitLab bot that queues, rebases, and merges requests serially.
- GitLab support
6.8/10★★★☆☆Visit site -
Best forSmall GitHub teams wanting guarded sequential merges
An open-source GitHub bot for teams that want guarded, sequential merges.
- GitHub support
6.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Anubis -
Best forSmall GitHub teams automating routine PR updates
A focused GitHub queue for automating routine pull request updates and merges.
- GitHub support
6.6/10★★★☆☆Visit Kodiak -
Best forGitHub teams wanting a minimal label-driven merge queue
A free, label-driven queue for GitHub teams that do not need batch validation.
- GitHub support
6.5/10★★★☆☆Visit site -
Best forOrganizations building self-hosted cross-project gates
A self-hosted CI system for coordinated gates, cross-project tests, and automatic merges.
6.4/10★★★☆☆Visit Zuul -
Best forGitLab users preferring an interactive terminal queue
A free, interactive GitLab CLI queue with eligibility checks and merge-train support.
- Merge trains
- GitLab support
6.3/10★★★☆☆Visit glmt -
Best forGitHub teams managing dependent PR stacks
An open-source, self-hosted tool for merging GitHub pull-request stacks and restacking branches.
- GitHub support
6.2/10★★★☆☆Visit staqd -
Best forGraphite users wanting managed merge automation
A managed merge queue for Graphite and GitHub workflows, with CI optimizations.
- GitHub support
6.1/10★★★☆☆Visit Graphite -
Best forSolo Claude Code users serializing local worktree lanes
A free, self-hosted FIFO queue for landing Claude Code worktree lanes on one machine.
6.0/10★★★☆☆Visit funador -
Best forSolo developers validating local Git task trains
A self-hosted FIFO queue for validating committed task branches before Git refs update.
- Merge trains
- Batch validation
5.9/10★★★☆☆Visit mergetrain -
Best forMac users who need menu-bar icon control
A focused macOS menu-bar utility, not a tool for merging pull requests.
5.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Dozer -
Best forUsers seeking cross-platform process-memory tools
A cross-platform process-memory analysis tool, not a merge queue.
5.6/10★★★☆☆Visit Squalr
No tools match those filters.
Compare at a glance
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | GitHub support | Batch validation | Merge trains | Deployment model | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mergify | Yes | $21/seat/mo | 8.9 | ||||
| 2 | Bitbucket | Yes | 8.5 | |||||
| 3 | Prow | Free | 8.1 | |||||
| 4 | Trunk Merge Queue | Yes | Yes | Yes | Hybrid | 7.9 | ||
| 5 | Aviator MergeQueue | No | $20/user/mo | Yes | Yes | No | Hybrid | 7.8 |
| 6 | GitLab Merge Trains | No | $29/user/mo | No | Yes | Yes | Hybrid | 7.7 |
| 7 | GitHub Merge Queue | Yes | $4/user/mo | Yes | Yes | No | Cloud | 7.6 |
| 8 | Marge-bot | Yes | Free | No | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.5 |
| 9 | DeployBot | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.4 |
| 10 | Merge Queue for Stacked PRs | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | Self_hosted | 7.3 | |
| 11 | Uber SubmitQueue | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.2 |
| 12 | gitea-mq | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.1 |
| 13 | Shunt | Yes | Free | No | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.0 |
| 14 | Build-Flow Labs Merge Queue | Free | Yes | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.9 | |
| 15 | GitLab Merger Bot | Free | No | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.8 | |
| 16 | Anubis | Free | Yes | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.7 | |
| 17 | Kodiak | Yes | $4.99/user/mo | Yes | No | No | Hybrid | 6.6 |
| 18 | Merge Queue Action | Yes | Free | Yes | No | No | Cloud | 6.5 |
| 19 | Zuul | Yes | Free | 6.4 | ||||
| 20 | glmt | Yes | Free | No | No | Yes | Self_hosted | 6.3 |
| 21 | staqd | Yes | Free | Yes | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.2 |
| 22 | Graphite Merge Queue | Yes | $20/user/mo | Yes | Cloud | 6.1 | ||
| 23 | Claude Code Merge Queue | Yes | Free | No | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.0 |
| 24 | mergetrain | Yes | Free | No | Yes | Yes | Self_hosted | 5.9 |
| 25 | Dozer | Free | 5.7 | |||||
| 26 | Squalr | Free | 5.6 |
Head-to-head All 28 comparisons →
- Mergify vs Bitbucket
- Mergify vs Prow
- Mergify vs Trunk Merge Queue
- Mergify vs Aviator MergeQueue
- Mergify vs GitLab Merge Trains
- Mergify vs GitHub Merge Queue
- Mergify vs Marge-bot
- Bitbucket vs Prow
- Bitbucket vs Trunk Merge Queue
Explore other topics All topics →
- AI Tools 303 directories · 8,267 tools ranked AI Writing Tools · AI Video Generators · Text-to-Speech Software
- Web Hosting & Domains 274 directories · 6,082 tools ranked Shared Web Hosting · Managed Cloud Hosting · Dedicated Server Hosting
- Productivity 157 directories · 4,947 tools ranked Note-Taking Apps · Calendar Apps · Project Management Software
- Marketing 134 directories · 3,935 tools ranked SEO Tools · Influencer Marketing Platforms · Email Marketing Software
- Sales & CRM 152 directories · 4,161 tools ranked Real Estate CRM Software · CRM Software · Proposal Software
- Customer Service 55 directories · 1,547 tools ranked Chatbot Builders · Knowledge Base Software · Call Center Software
How we rank merge queue software
Every tool on this page was researched by iTechGuides Editors from its official website — pricing pages, plan tables and product documentation. We rank on how well each one does this category's core job, what the free or entry plan includes, and where it falls short. Where we have enough verified facts, the score out of 10 is a rubric — job fit, value and how much we could verify — shown with its breakdown on every tool's page; a tool we have not verified enough to score yet shows its rank without a number. Scores are re-checked when a product changes its plans. Read the full editorial policy, or submit a tool we missed.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update