Best gitea-mq Alternatives in 2026
The top gitea-mq alternatives are Mergify, Bitbucket and Prow: 15 merge queue software our editors would look at instead of gitea-mq, in our ranking order.
gitea-mq: An open-source queue that validates pull requests in batches before they merge. Where it falls short: supports gitea and GitHub, but not GitLab or bitbucket..
Switching from gitea-mq? For most merge queue software buyers the best gitea-mq alternative is Mergify, built for teams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools. On a budget, GitHub Merge Queue starts at $4/user/mo. GitLab Merge Trains offers the most max parallel batches (20 batches).
Why People Look for a gitea-mq Alternative
- Supports Gitea and GitHub, but not GitLab or Bitbucket
- Requires PostgreSQL and a self-hosted service or container
- Support channels are limited to documentation
- No gitLab support — 4 of the alternatives below have it
- No merge trains — 1 of the alternatives below has it
Quick Picks by What You Need
- Best overallMergify8.9
Teams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools
Visit Mergify - Lowest priceGitHub Merge Queue7.6
Paid plans from $4/user/mo
Visit GitHub Merge Queue - Best free optionMergify8.9
Has a free plan
Visit Mergify - Most max parallel batchesGitLab Merge Trains7.7
20 batches
Visit GitLab Merge Trains - Best for gitlab supportTrunk Merge Queue7.9
GitLab support (gitea-mq: no)
Visit Trunk Merge Queue
All 15 gitea-mq Alternatives, Ranked
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
-
Best forTeams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 8.9 vs 7.1
Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.
8.9/10★★★★☆Visit Mergify -
Best forTeams already using Bitbucket and Pipelines
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 8.5 vs 7.1
A practical fit for Bitbucket teams that want merge queues alongside code hosting and CI/CD.
8.5/10★★★★☆Visit Bitbucket -
Best forOrganizations running self-hosted GitHub CI on Kubernetes
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 8.1 vs 7.1
Self-hosted CI and pull-request merge automation for teams running Kubernetes.
8.1/10★★★★☆Visit Prow -
Best forTeams needing batch validation and stack-aware queues
- Better than gitea-mq:
- GitLab support
- Editor score 7.9 vs 7.1
A stack-aware queue that batches CI checks and keeps unrelated pull requests moving.
- GitLab support
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.9/10★★★★☆Visit Trunk -
Best forTeams needing configurable queues across CI providers
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 7.8 vs 7.1
Configurable GitHub merge queues with batch validation and CI-provider integrations.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.8/10★★★★☆Visit Aviator -
Best forGitLab teams running parallel merge-train pipelines
- Better than gitea-mq:
- GitLab support
- Merge trains
- Editor score 7.7 vs 7.1
Parallel merge-train pipelines help GitLab teams validate queued changes in sequence.
- Merge trains
- GitLab support
- Batch validation
7.7/10★★★★☆Visit GitLab -
Best forGitHub teams wanting built-in FIFO merge validation
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 7.6 vs 7.1
A GitHub-native FIFO queue for validating grouped pull requests before merging.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.6/10★★★★☆Visit GitHub -
Best forGitLab teams wanting free, self-hosted batch testing
- Better than gitea-mq:
- GitLab support
- Editor score 7.5 vs 7.1
A GitLab-only merge bot for teams that want self-hosted CI and approval gates.
- GitLab support
- Batch validation
7.5/10★★★★☆Visit Marge-bot -
Best forSmall teams coordinating merges with deployment checks
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 7.4 vs 7.1
A self-hosted GitHub merge queue that coordinates reviewed commits with deployment checks.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.4/10★★★★☆Visit DeployBot -
Best forTeams merging stacked PRs as atomic batches
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 7.3 vs 7.1
Queues stacked GitHub pull requests by branch and merges validated batches atomically.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.3/10★★★★☆View on GitHub -
Best forLarge teams building speculative validation workflows
- Better than gitea-mq:
- Editor score 7.2 vs 7.1
An open-source, self-hosted queue that validates parallel changes against predicted branch states.
- Batch validation
- GitHub support
7.2/10★★★★☆Try Uber SubmitQueue -
Best forForgejo or Gitea teams needing batch CI validation
Batches Forgejo and Gitea pull requests for combined CI validation and failure isolation.
- Batch validation
7.0/10★★★★☆Visit Shunt -
Best forGitHub teams wanting a simple self-hosted FIFO queue
A focused FIFO queue for GitHub teams that want to manage merges on their own infrastructure.
- GitHub support
6.9/10★★★☆☆Visit site -
Best forGitLab teams wanting a self-hosted FIFO merge bot
- Better than gitea-mq:
- GitLab support
A self-hosted GitLab bot that queues, rebases, and merges requests serially.
- GitLab support
6.8/10★★★☆☆Visit site -
Best forSmall GitHub teams wanting guarded sequential merges
An open-source GitHub bot for teams that want guarded, sequential merges.
- GitHub support
6.7/10★★★☆☆Visit Anubis
gitea-mq Alternatives: Common Questions
What is the best alternative to gitea-mq?
Mergify: #1 in our Merge Queue Software ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.
Is there a free alternative to gitea-mq?
Yes. Mergify, Bitbucket, Prow, Trunk Merge Queue and GitHub Merge Queue have a free plan or a free tier (13 of the 15 alternatives on this page).
What is the cheapest paid alternative to gitea-mq?
Of the alternatives here that publish a price, GitHub Merge Queue starts lowest, at $4/user/mo.
Why do people look for gitea-mq alternatives?
Supports Gitea and GitHub, but not GitLab or Bitbucket; Requires PostgreSQL and a self-hosted service or container; Support channels are limited to documentation.
Which gitea-mq alternative has the most max parallel batches?
GitLab Merge Trains, with 20 batches.
How do I switch from gitea-mq?
Export your data from gitea-mq (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel gitea-mq.
How to Switch from gitea-mq
- Export your data from gitea-mq (most tools have an export in their settings).
- Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
- Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
- Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel gitea-mq.
gitea-mq vs Each Alternative
| # | Tool | Free plan | Paid from | GitHub support | Batch validation | Merge trains | Deployment model | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | gitea-mq | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.1 |
| 1 | Mergify | Yes | $21/seat/mo | 8.9 | ||||
| 2 | Bitbucket | Yes | 8.5 | |||||
| 3 | Prow | Free | 8.1 | |||||
| 4 | Trunk Merge Queue | Yes | Yes | Yes | Hybrid | 7.9 | ||
| 5 | Aviator MergeQueue | No | $20/user/mo | Yes | Yes | No | Hybrid | 7.8 |
| 6 | GitLab Merge Trains | No | $29/user/mo | No | Yes | Yes | Hybrid | 7.7 |
| 7 | GitHub Merge Queue | Yes | $4/user/mo | Yes | Yes | No | Cloud | 7.6 |
| 8 | Marge-bot | Yes | Free | No | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.5 |
| 9 | DeployBot | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.4 |
| 10 | Merge Queue for Stacked PRs | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | Self_hosted | 7.3 | |
| 11 | Uber SubmitQueue | Yes | Free | Yes | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.2 |
| 12 | Shunt | Yes | Free | No | Yes | No | Self_hosted | 7.0 |
| 13 | Build-Flow Labs Merge Queue | Free | Yes | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.9 | |
| 14 | GitLab Merger Bot | Free | No | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.8 | |
| 15 | Anubis | Free | Yes | No | No | Self_hosted | 6.7 |
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update