Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Cubic review

Freemium#49 of 51 in Code Review SoftwarePull Request Automation ToolsAI Code Review Tools

A GitHub-focused review platform with custom agents, scans, fixes, and analytics.

5.5/10Editor score
Cubic5.5 Visit Cubic

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Cubic is an AI-native code review platform for engineering teams using GitHub. It reviews pull requests automatically, adds inline feedback, generates pull-request descriptions, and applies team rules written in plain English. It also supports repository-wide scans for bugs and vulnerabilities, one-click fixes, background coding agents, an AI wiki, repository context, and analytics. A CLI provides local reviews before code is pushed, giving teams both pull-request and pre-push review options.

Cubic uses a freemium pricing model with a free plan. The Starter plan includes an AI code review agent, 20 free pull-request reviews per month, up to five custom agents, automatic pull-request descriptions, custom context, and connections to Jira, Linear, Asana, and Notion. Team is priced at $30 per developer per month when billed annually and adds 40k lines of code reviewed per developer, the Cubic CLI, Ultrareview, weekly wiki updates, and simple analytics. Pro is $79 per developer per month when billed annually, adding up to 10 custom agents, faster pull-request and CLI reviews, Confluence integration, codebase scans, automatic fix pull requests, and Slack and email notifications. Enterprise uses custom pricing and adds options such as SSO/SAML, GitHub Enterprise support, custom agreements, and bring-your-own API keys.

The strongest fit is a GitHub-centered team that wants automated review coverage alongside custom rules, codebase analysis, and connections to project-management and collaboration tools. Two-way GitHub synchronization keeps the workflow centered on the repository, while context from Jira, Linear, Asana, Notion, and Confluence can inform reviews. Teams that need broader code-host coverage or a non-web primary platform should look elsewhere. Cubic is most compelling when AI review, repository context, and generated fixes are central to the development process.

Cubic pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Automated pull-request reviews with inline feedback and generated descriptions
    • Custom review agents and plain-English rules for team-specific checks
    • Repository scans, one-click fixes, CLI reviews, and background coding agents
  • Where it doesn't
    • Supports GitHub as its code host
    • The platform is web-only, aside from its local CLI reviews
    • Advanced features are concentrated in paid Team, Pro, and Enterprise plans

Cubic fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update