Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best ASReview Alternatives in 2026

Free#17 of 38 in AI Literature Review SoftwareLiterature Review SoftwareSystematic Review Software

The top ASReview alternatives are EPPI-Reviewer, Rayyan and DistillerSR: 15 AI literature review software our editors would look at instead of ASReview, in our ranking order.

7.4/10Editor score
ASReview7.4 Visit ASReview

ASReview: A free, customizable screening tool for researchers who want open-source control. Where it falls short: primarily focuses on screening and prioritization.

Switching from ASReview? For most ai literature review software buyers the best ASReview alternative is EPPI-Reviewer, built for flexible academic evidence synthesis. On a budget, INRA starts at $7.50/seat/mo. Rayyan has a free plan. Mapped Research offers the most collaboration seats (10).

Why People Look for an ASReview Alternative

  • Primarily focuses on screening and prioritization
  • Does not provide AI-generated paper summaries
  • Customization and self-hosting suit technical users more than casual users
  • No aI paper summaries — 4 of the alternatives below have it

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 ASReview Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Best forFlexible academic evidence synthesis

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 9.2 vs 7.4

    A broad evidence-synthesis workspace with strong analysis tools and paid collaboration costs.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    9.2/10★★★★★
    Visit EPPI-Reviewer
  2. Rayyan

    Best forMobile collaborative screening

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 8.8 vs 7.4

    A collaborative screening workspace with AI ranking, PICO tools, and mobile access.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    8.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Rayyan
  3. Best forTraceable institutional reviews

    • Better than ASReview:
    • AI paper summaries
    • Editor score 8.7 vs 7.4

    A configurable review platform for traceable academic, healthcare, and institutional evidence work.

    • AI paper summaries
    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    8.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit DistillerSR
  4. Covidence

    Best forEstablished review teams

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 7.4

    A mature review workspace with broad evidence-management and collaboration workflows.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Covidence
  5. Best forInstitutional evidence synthesis

    • Better than ASReview:
    • AI paper summaries
    • Editor score 8.4 vs 7.4

    A structured evidence-synthesis workspace with broad AI-assisted review capabilities.

    • AI paper summaries
    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    8.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit Nested
  6. Elicit

    Best forResearchers combining literature discovery and review

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 8.3 vs 7.4

    A broad AI workspace for discovering, extracting, and reviewing research evidence.

    8.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Elicit
  7. Best forPICO-based citation screening

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 8.1 vs 7.4

    A PICO-focused review workspace with screening, collaboration, extraction, and PRISMA support.

    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    Pricing on request Our Sorcero iSLR verdict → Visit Sorcero
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Sorcero
  8. Iris.ai

    Best forOrganizations analyzing document collections

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 8.0 vs 7.4

    Explore research collections, ask source-grounded questions, and extract structured information.

    Free plan · 10-day trial Our Iris.ai verdict → Visit Iris.ai
    8.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Iris.ai
  9. Scholarcy

    Best forResearchers who mainly need paper summaries and libraries

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 7.4

    A practical summarizer and research library for organizing papers and citations.

    Free plan · 7-day trial Our Scholarcy verdict → Visit Scholarcy
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Scholarcy
  10. Axelium

    Best forEnd-to-end systematic reviews

    • Better than ASReview:
    • AI paper summaries
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 7.4

    A broad end-to-end workflow for systematic reviews, from screening through synthesis and reporting.

    • AI paper summaries
    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Axelium
  11. Best forCollaborative evidence reviews

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 7.7 vs 7.4

    A broad evidence-review workspace with strong collaboration and a high paid entry price.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Try Mapped Research
  12. Best forPaid, full-featured review projects

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 7.6 vs 7.4

    A full systematic-review workspace with one-time pricing and a free exploration tier.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Systematicly
  13. INRA

    Best forCitation-backed narrative reviews

    • Better than ASReview:
    • AI paper summaries
    • Editor score 7.5 vs 7.4

    A citation-backed review workspace spanning narrative synthesis and systematic review tasks.

    • AI paper summaries
    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    Free plan Our INRA verdict → Visit INRA
    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit INRA
  14. Best forDatabase-heavy systematic reviews

    • Better than ASReview:
    • Editor score 7.5 vs 7.4

    A database-focused workspace for screening, extraction, risk of bias, and PRISMA reporting.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    Free plan · 14-day trial Our PICO Portal verdict → Visit PICO Portal
    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit PICO Portal
  15. Evidentum

    Best forFree, open-source systematic reviews

    A free, open-source workbench for structured, database-spanning systematic reviews.

    • Full-text analysis
    • Screening workflow
    • Systematic review support
    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit Evidentum

ASReview Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to ASReview?

EPPI-Reviewer: #1 in our AI Literature Review Software ranking, with an editor score of 9.2 out of 10. A broad evidence-synthesis workspace with strong analysis tools and paid collaboration costs.

Is there a free alternative to ASReview?

Yes. Rayyan, Elicit, Iris.ai, Scholarcy and Axelium have a free plan or a free tier (10 of the 15 alternatives on this page).

What is the cheapest paid alternative to ASReview?

Of the alternatives here that publish a price, INRA starts lowest, at $7.50/seat/mo.

Why do people look for ASReview alternatives?

Primarily focuses on screening and prioritization; Does not provide AI-generated paper summaries; Customization and self-hosting suit technical users more than casual users.

Which ASReview alternative has the most collaboration seats?

Mapped Research, with 10.

How do I switch from ASReview?

Export your data from ASReview (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel ASReview.

How to Switch from ASReview

  1. Export your data from ASReview (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel ASReview.

ASReview vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromScreening workflowFull-text analysisSystematic review supportScore
17ASReviewYesFreeYesYes7.4
1EPPI-ReviewerNoYesYesYes9.2
2RayyanYes$8.33/seat/moYesYesYes8.8
3DistillerSRNoYesYesYes8.7
4CovidenceNoYesYesYes8.5
5Nested KnowledgeNoYesYesYes8.4
6ElicitYes8.3
7Sorcero iSLRYesYes8.1
8Iris.aiYes8.0
9ScholarcyYes7.8
10AxeliumYes$29/moYesYesYes7.8
11Mapped ResearchYes$119 one-timeYesYesYes7.7
12SystematiclyYes$149 one-timeYesYesYes7.6
13INRAYes$7.50/seat/moYesYesYes7.5
14PICO PortalYesYesYesYes7.5
15EvidentumYesFreeYesYesYes7.4

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update