Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best Anubis Alternatives in 2026

Free#16 of 26 in Merge Queue Software

The top Anubis alternatives are Mergify, Bitbucket and Prow: 15 merge queue software our editors would look at instead of Anubis, in our ranking order.

6.7/10Editor score
Anubis6.7 Visit Anubis

Anubis: An open-source GitHub bot for teams that want guarded, sequential merges. Where it falls short: works with GitHub, not GitLab or bitbucket.

Switching from Anubis? For most merge queue software buyers the best Anubis alternative is Mergify, built for teams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools. On a budget, GitHub Merge Queue starts at $4/user/mo. GitLab Merge Trains offers the most max parallel batches (20 batches).

Why People Look for an Anubis Alternative

  • Works with GitHub, not GitLab or Bitbucket
  • Does not document batch validation or merge trains
  • Requires a server you host and a configured GitHub account
  • No gitLab support — 4 of the alternatives below have it
  • No batch validation — 10 of the alternatives below have it

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 Anubis Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Mergify

    Best forTeams needing merge queues plus CI test-health tools

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Editor score 8.9 vs 6.7

    Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.

    Free plan · 14-day trial Our Mergify verdict → Visit Mergify
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Mergify
  2. Bitbucket

    Best forTeams already using Bitbucket and Pipelines

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 6.7

    A practical fit for Bitbucket teams that want merge queues alongside code hosting and CI/CD.

    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Bitbucket
  3. Prow

    Best forOrganizations running self-hosted GitHub CI on Kubernetes

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Editor score 8.1 vs 6.7

    Self-hosted CI and pull-request merge automation for teams running Kubernetes.

    Open source Our Prow verdict → Visit Prow
    8.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Prow
  4. Best forTeams needing batch validation and stack-aware queues

    • Better than Anubis:
    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.9 vs 6.7

    A stack-aware queue that batches CI checks and keeps unrelated pull requests moving.

    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Trunk
  5. Best forTeams needing configurable queues across CI providers

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 6.7

    Configurable GitHub merge queues with batch validation and CI-provider integrations.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Aviator
  6. Best forGitLab teams running parallel merge-train pipelines

    • Better than Anubis:
    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    • Merge trains

    Parallel merge-train pipelines help GitLab teams validate queued changes in sequence.

    • Merge trains
    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit GitLab
  7. Best forGitHub teams wanting built-in FIFO merge validation

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.6 vs 6.7

    A GitHub-native FIFO queue for validating grouped pull requests before merging.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    Free plan · 30-day trial Our GitHub Merge Queue verdict → Visit GitHub
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit GitHub
  8. Marge-bot

    Best forGitLab teams wanting free, self-hosted batch testing

    • Better than Anubis:
    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.5 vs 6.7

    A GitLab-only merge bot for teams that want self-hosted CI and approval gates.

    • GitLab support
    • Batch validation
    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Marge-bot
  9. DeployBot

    Best forSmall teams coordinating merges with deployment checks

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.4 vs 6.7

    A self-hosted GitHub merge queue that coordinates reviewed commits with deployment checks.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit DeployBot
  10. Best forTeams merging stacked PRs as atomic batches

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.3 vs 6.7

    Queues stacked GitHub pull requests by branch and merges validated batches atomically.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.3/10★★★★☆
    View on GitHub
  11. Best forLarge teams building speculative validation workflows

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.2 vs 6.7

    An open-source, self-hosted queue that validates parallel changes against predicted branch states.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.2/10★★★★☆
    Try Uber SubmitQueue
  12. gitea-mq

    Best forGitea or GitHub teams wanting open-source batch queues

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.1 vs 6.7

    An open-source queue that validates pull requests in batches before they merge.

    • Batch validation
    • GitHub support
    7.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit gitea-mq
  13. Shunt

    Best forForgejo or Gitea teams needing batch CI validation

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Batch validation
    • Editor score 7.0 vs 6.7

    Batches Forgejo and Gitea pull requests for combined CI validation and failure isolation.

    • Batch validation
    Free plan Our Shunt verdict → Visit Shunt
    7.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit Shunt
  14. Best forGitHub teams wanting a simple self-hosted FIFO queue

    • Better than Anubis:
    • Editor score 6.9 vs 6.7

    A focused FIFO queue for GitHub teams that want to manage merges on their own infrastructure.

    • GitHub support
    6.9/10★★★☆☆
    Visit site
  15. Best forGitLab teams wanting a self-hosted FIFO merge bot

    • Better than Anubis:
    • GitLab support
    • Editor score 6.8 vs 6.7

    A self-hosted GitLab bot that queues, rebases, and merges requests serially.

    • GitLab support
    6.8/10★★★☆☆
    Visit site

Anubis Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to Anubis?

Mergify: #1 in our Merge Queue Software ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. Merge queues and stacked PRs paired with test-health tools and broad CI integrations.

Is there a free alternative to Anubis?

Yes. Mergify, Bitbucket, Prow, Trunk Merge Queue and GitHub Merge Queue have a free plan or a free tier (13 of the 15 alternatives on this page).

What is the cheapest paid alternative to Anubis?

Of the alternatives here that publish a price, GitHub Merge Queue starts lowest, at $4/user/mo.

Why do people look for Anubis alternatives?

Works with GitHub, not GitLab or Bitbucket; Does not document batch validation or merge trains; Requires a server you host and a configured GitHub account.

Which Anubis alternative has the most max parallel batches?

GitLab Merge Trains, with 20 batches.

How do I switch from Anubis?

Export your data from Anubis (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Anubis.

How to Switch from Anubis

  1. Export your data from Anubis (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Anubis.

Anubis vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromGitHub supportBatch validationMerge trainsDeployment modelScore
16AnubisFreeYesNoNoSelf_hosted6.7
1MergifyYes$21/seat/mo8.9
2BitbucketYes8.5
3ProwFree8.1
4Trunk Merge QueueYesYesYesHybrid7.9
5Aviator MergeQueueNo$20/user/moYesYesNoHybrid7.8
6GitLab Merge TrainsNo$29/user/moNoYesYesHybrid7.7
7GitHub Merge QueueYes$4/user/moYesYesNoCloud7.6
8Marge-botYesFreeNoYesNoSelf_hosted7.5
9DeployBotYesFreeYesYesNoSelf_hosted7.4
10Merge Queue for Stacked PRsYesFreeYesYesSelf_hosted7.3
11Uber SubmitQueueYesFreeYesYesNoSelf_hosted7.2
12gitea-mqYesFreeYesYesNoSelf_hosted7.1
13ShuntYesFreeNoYesNoSelf_hosted7.0
14Build-Flow Labs Merge QueueFreeYesNoNoSelf_hosted6.9
15GitLab Merger BotFreeNoNoNoSelf_hosted6.8

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update