iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
History points to a mid-teens gain for the S&P 500 after U.S. midterm elections, while Bitcoin’s observed post-midterm average is much larger but far less reliable. J.P. Morgan puts the S&P 500’s average 12-month gain after midterms since 1950 at about 15%; BlackRock finds a 14.1% average over six months since 1970. CoinDesk calculates a 53.7% average Bitcoin gain from the 2014, 2018 and 2022 post-midterm years, excluding 2010. That Bitcoin figure comes from only three comparable observations and overlaps with the cryptocurrency’s four-year halving cycle, so it is a historical coincidence rather than a dependable forecast.
What has happened to markets after U.S. midterms?
The broad historical pattern has favored equities after midterm voting, but the evidence is not equally strong for both assets. The S&P 500 has decades of observations across different economic regimes. Bitcoin has only three reasonably comparable post-midterm periods.
| Asset | Window after Election Day | Historical result | How to interpret it |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&P 500 | 12 months | About 15% average after every midterm since 1950 (J.P. Morgan Asset Management, 2026) | A recurring mid-teens association, not a guaranteed target |
| S&P 500 | Six months | 14.1% average since 1970 (BlackRock, 2026) | Shorter window; methodology and return type matter |
| Bitcoin | Post-midterm years 2014, 2018 and 2022 | 53.7% average (CoinDesk analysis, 2026) | Only three observations, each within a halving cycle |
The 2026 U.S. midterms are scheduled for November 3, 2026. All 435 House seats and 35 Senate seats are contested, but the market response will depend on the result relative to expectations, not simply on the act of voting.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →How strong is the S&P 500’s post-midterm pattern?
Several independent series point in the same direction, with differences caused by measurement choices. J.P. Morgan reports an average gain of about 15% in the 12 months after every midterm since 1950. BlackRock reports a 14.1% average six-month gain since 1970 and says equities historically began rising about one month before Election Day as polling reduced uncertainty.
Hartford Funds data reported by CoinDesk shows a 15.17% average S&P 500 gain in the year after midterms since 1950, compared with 7.30% in other years. BNY’s separate calculation produces a 16.6% average 12-month price return since the 1950s. These are not contradictory forecasts: start dates, six- versus 12-month windows, and price-return versus total-return conventions produce different averages.
Fidelity Investments says 95% of 12-month periods after midterms produced S&P 500 price gains since 1938. MSCI reports that the MSCI USA Index rose after every midterm since 1974, averaging 12% in the following six months. A high historical hit rate still says nothing about the size or timing of the next move.
How much has Bitcoin rallied after midterms?
Bitcoin’s available post-midterm record is positive, but it is too small to establish an election effect. Block Scholes reports these one-year results:
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsAlso popular on Amazon
| Midterm year | Post-midterm Bitcoin gain |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 25.6% |
| 2018 | 44.4% |
| 2022 | 78.1% |
CoinDesk averages those three observations at 53.7% and excludes 2010, when Bitcoin was still a fringe market and the 1,579% result would dominate the calculation. Excluding an extreme early observation makes the statistic less distorted, but it does not solve the underlying sample-size problem.
Each usable midterm also fell within Bitcoin’s four-year halving cycle. The rebounds may therefore reflect a new crypto-market cycle, liquidity conditions or recovery from a prior sell-off rather than a political response. Treating 53.7% as a forecast would confuse a small historical coincidence with a tested relationship.
Does the party that wins control determine returns?
There is no clear evidence that one party reliably produces better post-midterm returns. Block Scholes found positive one-year S&P 500 returns after all eight midterms in its sample: 14.3% after Republican House wins and 9.8% after Democratic wins. The same analysis concluded that party control did not explain the result consistently.
Also popular on Amazon
BlackRock found a 16.1% average six-month gain when a party gained control or Congress remained divided, versus 10.4% when one party lost the presidential trifecta. A trifecta means holding the presidency, the House and the Senate. These are historical associations, not causal rules; markets may already price an expected result before votes are counted.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Fidelity’s Denise Chisholm summarizes the political takeaway as “Markets love gridlock.” Fidelity vice president Anu Gaggar offers a broader warning: “Vote in the booths, not in your portfolios.”
What could overwhelm the pattern in 2026?
Election season is only one input into asset prices. The historical averages can be overwhelmed by:
Also popular on Amazon
- Interest rates and Treasury yields: Higher yields can reduce the value investors place on future corporate cash flows and tighten financial conditions.
- Inflation and Federal Reserve policy: A renewed inflation surge or a less supportive policy stance can outweigh a favorable election result.
- Earnings and economic growth: J.P. Morgan highlights earnings growth, GDP and consumer sentiment; Fidelity says corporate earnings, capital spending and economic conditions have mattered more than election outcomes.
- Artificial-intelligence investment: J.P. Morgan identifies AI-related capital spending as a support, while MSCI flags an AI-spending slowdown as a risk.
- Energy shocks: MSCI specifically warns that an oil shock could overpower the historical midterm tendency.
- Crypto liquidity and cycle risk: Bitcoin can move sharply because of leverage, liquidity changes and its halving cycle, regardless of congressional control.
Fidelity’s Chisholm captures the uncertainty directly: “Basically, anything can happen.”
Should you buy Bitcoin or an S&P 500 ETF before November 3?
Historical averages cannot determine a suitable purchase for an individual investor. An S&P 500 index cannot be bought directly; investors generally use a fund that tracks it, gaining broad equity diversification but still accepting market, valuation and interest-rate risk. Bitcoin offers a different exposure with substantially higher volatility, and ownership requires decisions about custody, private-key security and exchange or platform risk.
A disciplined decision starts with the time horizon and risk that can be tolerated, not with a single election statistic. Investors who already have a target allocation can rebalance according to that plan rather than making an all-or-nothing election bet. Anyone considering a new position should distinguish a six-month historical average from a 12-month one, account for the possibility of a decline, and avoid treating the Bitcoin sample as an expected 53.7% return. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Also popular on Amazon
How should the historical numbers be used?
- Match the window: Use six-month figures for a six-month question and 12-month figures for a 12-month question; do not combine them into one target.
- Check the evidence depth: Decades of S&P 500 observations carry more statistical weight than three Bitcoin cycles.
- Separate association from cause: Post-election gains may reflect falling uncertainty, economic recovery, earnings or liquidity rather than the election itself.
- Stress-test the thesis: Consider rates, inflation, earnings, AI spending, oil and Federal Reserve policy before relying on a seasonal pattern.
- Keep implementation diversified: A broad equity fund and direct Bitcoin exposure have different volatility, liquidity and custody characteristics.
The defensible conclusion is a range, not a promise: historical S&P 500 results cluster around the mid-teens after midterms, while Bitcoin’s three-cycle average is much higher but statistically fragile. Neither figure establishes what prices will do after November 3, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a presidential trifecta?
A presidential trifecta occurs when the same party controls the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate. Analysts use the term to describe unified federal control; losing any one of those institutions ends the trifecta.
Why can a market rise even when an election result is disappointing?
Prices reflect expectations formed before Election Day as well as the result itself. If investors feared a worse outcome, an outcome viewed as merely less bad can trigger a relief rally even without a change in underlying earnings or growth.
Does a 95% historical gain rate mean the S&P 500 is nearly risk-free after midterms?
No. The statistic counts how often the index finished higher over a 12-month period, not how large the gains were or how severe interim losses became. A period can include a substantial drawdown and still end modestly positive.
What is the difference between an index and an ETF that tracks it?
The S&P 500 is a market index, so it is a calculation rather than a security that can be purchased directly. An ETF or mutual fund can seek to replicate the index, but its expenses, tracking difference and trading price can keep its return from matching the index exactly.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
