In 2010, China’s electronics-component distribution market had no single clear controller: it was fragmented, with Taiwan-based WPG Holdings holding a regional head start while Arrow Electronics and Avnet expanded their Asia-Pacific presence. China had become a major battleground because manufacturing outsourcing and demand for phones, LCD televisions and PCs were drawing distributors toward the market.
The figures below describe the contest as reported by EE Times on October 5, 2010. They are a historical snapshot, not evidence of which company leads China today.
| # | Preview | Product | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order | $23.45 | Buy on Amazon |
| 2 |
|
distributors and manufacturers win the Road (China Dealer of the Road Series) | $36.37 | Buy on Amazon |
Why were distributors competing for control in China?
Arrow and Avnet were already dominant distributors in North America and Europe, while China represented the next major regional contest. Its appeal came from both outsourced electronics manufacturing and local demand for consumer products such as mobile phones, LCD televisions and personal computers.
Distribution was not only a contest over which company could offer the broadest component catalog. The 2010 analysis also identified geographic reach, proximity to manufacturing centers, acquisition capacity, the ability to finance inventory and value-added support for OEMs, electronics manufacturing services (EMS) providers and design engineers as competitive factors.
Recommended Free Tools
#1 Best Overall
How large was China’s semiconductor distribution channel?
iSuppli figures reported by EE Times for 2009 show a large but fragmented channel. Distributors handled just over half of China’s semiconductor sales, and the top 11 distributors accounted for only 37 percent of the value handled by distributors.
| 2009 measure | Value | What it represents |
|---|---|---|
| China semiconductor sales | $49.5 billion | Total market sales, according to iSuppli figures reported by EE Times. |
| Sales handled by distributors | $25.7 billion | Distributor-handled semiconductor value, according to the same 2009 figures. |
| Sales handled by the top 11 distributors | $9.6 billion, or 37 percent | Share of distributor-handled value—not 37 percent of China’s entire semiconductor market. |
The concentration figure helps explain why the article anticipated more consolidation: substantial business remained outside the top 11 distributors.
How did WPG, Avnet and Arrow compare in 2009?
The reported China sales figures put WPG ahead of the two Western distributors, though the evidence has an important distinction: WPG’s figure came from company results, while Avnet’s and Arrow’s were iSuppli estimates.
| Distributor | 2009 China sales | Change from 2008 | Basis reported by EE Times |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPG Holdings | $2.9 billion | Up 33 percent | WPG company results. |
| Avnet | $1.63 billion | Up 18 percent | iSuppli estimate. |
| Arrow Electronics | $1.58 billion | Up 26 percent | iSuppli estimate. |
These figures describe China sales in 2009; they do not establish a current ranking or a broader measure of each company’s overall global business.
Why did the distributors pursue acquisitions?
Avnet: extend reach through selected assets
Avnet announced that it was buying selected assets of Eurotone Electric Ltd., a China distributor focused on wind and solar power. EE Times presented the deal as part of a string of acquisitions, illustrating how a larger distributor could extend its position by adding local operations and a focused market presence.
WPG: build regional scale
WPG’s share-swap acquisition of Yosun Industrial showed another route to scale: combine an Asia-based distributor’s regional footprint with a major local player. WPG and Yosun together reported 2009 Asia-Pacific semiconductor-component sales of 316 billion New Taiwan dollars (US$10.2 billion). That is an Asia-Pacific combined-sales figure, not a China-only total.
Smaller distributors: pressure to consolidate
The article identified inventory financing as a structural challenge: distributors must fund substantial stocks of components. In a fragmented market, the financing burden could put pressure on smaller firms and encourage combinations. EE Times named Yuson Group, Wintech, SAS Dragon and SAMT as possible consolidation candidates; the article’s reference to candidates does not establish that any of them was subsequently acquired.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.What did the 2010 contest show—and what does it not show?
At the time, WPG’s Asia-Pacific focus and proximity to Chinese manufacturing centers gave it a regional advantage, while Arrow and Avnet brought established global distribution operations and were broadening their presence through acquisitions. The reported market shares and deals show why the contest was framed as a fight for position rather than a settled handover of control.
Because the cited EE Times analysis dates to October 5, 2010, its figures and company positions cannot establish who leads China’s market in 2026 or what happened to the named firms afterward. They explain the competitive logic of that period, not the present-day market structure.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
