Head-to-head · Command-Line Shells
Zsh vs Fish
Zsh leads on 0 checks, Fish on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreZsh · 8.8/10
- Free planboth
Zsh scores higher on our rubric for command-line shells: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #3.
Zsh is the better fit for users who want advanced Unix shell customization. Fish is the better fit for interactive users seeking suggestions and rich completion.
- Zsh fits best
Users who want advanced Unix shell customization
- Fish fits best
Interactive users seeking suggestions and rich completion
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Zsh 8.8/10 Visit ↗ | Fish 8.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Ranking | #2 in Command-Line Shells | #3 in Command-Line Shells |
| Best for | Users who want advanced Unix shell customization | Interactive users seeking suggestions and rich completion |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | macOS, Linux, Windows |
| Support | Community, Docs | Docs, Community |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Zsh 2/3 · Fish 2/3 | ||
| Package manager | Not published | — |
| Config file support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Command completion | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported platforms | Unix; Windows via Cygwin | macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows environments (WSL, Cygwin, MSYS2) |
| Scripting language | Zsh shell scripting language | fish |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Zsh is a freely available command interpreter designed for interactive use and scripting. It suits people who want to tailor a Unix command-line environment, from individual users to teams across company sizes. Its shell scripting language… Read the review → |
Fish is a free, open-source command-line shell for people who value interactive guidance while working in a terminal. It runs on macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows environments including WSL, Cygwin, and MSYS2. Syntax highlighting,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Zsh — where it wins
- Programmable completion and multi-line command editing
- Advanced filename globbing, arrays, arithmetic, and spelling correction
- Customizable prompts and options through startup files
Where it doesn't
- Windows support is through Cygwin rather than a standalone current port
- Requires compiling from source on modern Unix systems
- Community and documentation are the listed support channels
Fish — where it wins
- Highlights command syntax and suggests commands from history, completions, and file paths.
- Offers navigable tab completion plus general and command-specific scripted completions.
- Includes fish scripting, built-in help, and browser-based configuration.
Where it doesn't
- Uses its own fish scripting language rather than a listed alternative shell language.
- Support channels are documentation and community.
- Does not include AI features or a package manager.
- Zsh8.8/10 · Free plan
A free, customizable shell for users who want advanced command-line control.
Visit ZshFull verdict → - Fish8.7/10 · Free plan
Fish pairs history-based suggestions with rich completion and a browser-based configuration interface.
Visit FishFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Bash vs Zsh
- Bash vs Fish
- Zsh vs Dash
- Zsh vs BusyBox ash
- Zsh vs OpenBSD KornShell (ksh)
- Zsh vs tcsh
- Zsh vs PowerShell
- Fish vs Dash
All Command-Line shells comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update