Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Command-Line Shells

Zsh vs Dash

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Zsh #2 in Command-Line Shells 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Zsh
Dash #4 in Command-Line Shells 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 3 features Visit Debian Project

Zsh leads on 1 check, Dash on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreZsh · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresZsh · 2 of 3

Zsh scores higher on our rubric for command-line shells: 8.8 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.

Zsh offers command completion; Dash doesn't.

Zsh is the better fit for users who want advanced Unix shell customization. Dash is the better fit for lightweight POSIX shell scripting on Linux.

  • Zsh fits best

    Users who want advanced Unix shell customization

  • Dash fits best

    Lightweight POSIX shell scripting on Linux

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Zsh 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Dash 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.5
Ranking #2 in Command-Line Shells #4 in Command-Line Shells
Best for Users who want advanced Unix shell customization Lightweight POSIX shell scripting on Linux
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Linux, macOS, Windows Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Zsh 2/3 · Dash 1/3
Package manager Not published —
Config file support ✓ ✓
Command completion ✓ (best) —
Specs
Supported platforms Unix; Windows via Cygwin linux
Scripting language Zsh shell scripting language POSIX sh shell language
Our review
Pros
  • Programmable completion and multi-line command editing
  • Advanced filename globbing, arrays, arithmetic, and spelling correction
  • Customizable prompts and options through startup files
  • Implements POSIX /bin/sh for portable shell scripts
  • Supports pipelines, redirection, expansions and shell builtins
  • Offers interactive job control plus Vi and Emacs editing modes
Cons
  • Windows support is through Cygwin rather than a standalone current port
  • Requires compiling from source on modern Unix systems
  • Community and documentation are the listed support channels
  • Linux platform coverage only
  • No command-completion support
  • Focused on POSIX sh rather than broader shell features
Our verdict

Zsh is a freely available command interpreter designed for interactive use and scripting. It suits people who want to tailor a Unix command-line environment, from individual users to teams across company sizes. Its shell scripting language…

Read the review →

Dash is a compact, open-source command interpreter and POSIX-compliant implementation of /bin/sh, distributed by the Debian Project. It is suited to Linux users and administrators who need a lightweight shell for running scripts or…

Read the review →
  1. ZshCommand-Line Shells 8.8Free plan
  2. DashCommand-Line Shells 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Zsh — where it wins

    • Programmable completion and multi-line command editing
    • Advanced filename globbing, arrays, arithmetic, and spelling correction
    • Customizable prompts and options through startup files

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows support is through Cygwin rather than a standalone current port
    • Requires compiling from source on modern Unix systems
    • Community and documentation are the listed support channels
  • Dash — where it wins

    • Implements POSIX /bin/sh for portable shell scripts
    • Supports pipelines, redirection, expansions and shell builtins
    • Offers interactive job control plus Vi and Emacs editing modes

    Where it doesn't

    • Linux platform coverage only
    • No command-completion support
    • Focused on POSIX sh rather than broader shell features

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update