Head-to-head · Debuggers
WinDbg vs Delve
WinDbg leads on 0 checks, Delve on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreWinDbg · 9.0/10
- Free planboth
WinDbg scores higher on our rubric for debuggers: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.
WinDbg is the better fit for windows and kernel debugging. Delve is the better fit for go developers.
- WinDbg fits best
Windows and kernel debugging
- Delve fits best
Go developers
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | WinDbg 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Delve 8.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ranking | #3 in Debuggers | #4 in Debuggers |
| Best for | Windows and kernel debugging | Go developers |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop | Desktop, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows | Linux, Windows, macOS |
| Support | Docs | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features WinDbg 5/5 · Delve 5/5 | ||
| Remote debugging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Conditional breakpoints | ✓ | ✓ |
| Exception breakpoints | ✓ | ✓ |
| Time-travel debugging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Core dump debugging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported languages | C++, C#, JavaScript, assembly | Go |
| Target platforms | Windows; Linux crash dumps | Linux, macOS, Windows, FreeBSD |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | WinDbg is Microsoft’s debugger for live user-mode and kernel-mode code, crash dumps, and minidumps. It is aimed at software developers, driver developers, system engineers, and incident investigators working with Windows applications,… Read the review → |
Delve is an open-source, source-level debugger for Go programs. It is designed for Go developers who need more than basic breakpoints, including control over running processes, runtime inspection, remote debugging, and editor integration.… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
WinDbg — where it wins
- Combines user-mode and kernel-mode debugging for Windows code and drivers
- Supports crash dumps, remote sessions, and configurable exception handling
- Time Travel Debugging records and replays execution for deeper analysis
Where it doesn't
- Its primary focus is Windows rather than cross-platform debugging
- Linux support centers on kernel and ELF core-dump analysis
- The broad feature set may be more than basic application debugging requires
Delve — where it wins
- Free and open-source with source-level Go debugging
- Remote, headless, JSON-RPC, and DAP support
- Core dumps, goroutines, and reverse execution inspection
Where it doesn't
- Supports only the Go programming language
- Primarily a command-line debugging experience
- No AI-assisted debugging features
- WinDbg9.0/10 · Free plan
A free, deeply capable debugger for Windows applications, drivers, and crash analysis.
Visit MicrosoftFull verdict → - Delve8.8/10 · Free plan
A deep, free Go debugger for developers who need process and runtime control.
Visit DelveFull verdict →
More comparisons
- GDB vs WinDbg
- GDB vs Delve
- LLDB vs WinDbg
- LLDB vs Delve
- WinDbg vs Xdebug
- WinDbg vs IDA Pro
- WinDbg vs RenderDoc
- WinDbg vs CUDA-GDB
All debuggers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





