Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Git Clients

Tower vs Fork

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Tower #5 in Git Clients 7.1/10 From $5.75/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial ✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Tower
Fork #8 in Git Clients 6.8/10 From $59/user ✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Fork

Tower leads on 0 checks, Fork on 3, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTower · 7.1/10
  • Most featuresFork · 3 of 3

Tower scores higher on our rubric for git clients: 7.1 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

Fork offers visual history; Tower doesn't publish it. Fork offers conflict resolution; Tower doesn't publish it. Fork offers submodule support; Tower doesn't publish it.

Tower is the better fit for teams seeking paid Git workflows and collaboration. Fork is the better fit for desktop users who want a one-time-purchase Git GUI.

  • Tower fits best

    Teams seeking paid Git workflows and collaboration

  • Fork fits best

    Desktop users who want a one-time-purchase Git GUI

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Tower 7.1/10 Visit ↗ Fork 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.1 6.8
Ranking #5 in Git Clients #8 in Git Clients
Best for Teams seeking paid Git workflows and collaboration Desktop users who want a one-time-purchase Git GUI
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms macOS, Windows Windows, macOS
Support Email, Docs Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Tower 0/3 · Fork 3/3
Visual history Not published ✓ (best)
Conflict resolution Not published ✓ (best)
Submodule support Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Supported platforms Not published macOS, Windows
Repository hosting Not published GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, self-hosted Git repositories
Git workflows Not published branching, merging, rebasing, interactive rebasing, cherry-picking, stashing
Our review
Pros
  • Visual staging, committing, branching, and drag-and-drop workflows
  • Graphical conflict resolution, interactive rebase, and Git LFS
  • Pull-request workflows and integrations with major Git hosting services
  • Visual history, staging, and branch management in one desktop client
  • Supports interactive rebase, cherry-pick, stash, and conflict resolution
  • Connects to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps
Cons
  • No perpetual free plan; access starts with a 30-day trial
  • Basic is limited to 1 user and lacks listed team-management features
  • Desktop-only, with versions for macOS and Windows
  • No free plan; the license costs $59 per user
  • Available only for macOS and Windows
  • Desktop-focused, with no mobile or web client
Our verdict

Tower is a desktop Git client for developers, designers, and teams working with local and remote repositories. Its visual controls cover staging, committing, branches, merges, rebasing, conflict resolution, submodules, Git LFS, pull…

Read the review →

Fork is a desktop Git client for Windows and macOS, aimed at developers who prefer a visual interface for everyday repository work. It brings commit and branch history, repository management, staging, and committing into one application,…

Read the review →
  1. TowerGit Clients 7.1From $5.75/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial
  2. ForkGit Clients 6.8From $59/user

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Tower — where it wins

    • Visual staging, committing, branching, and drag-and-drop workflows
    • Graphical conflict resolution, interactive rebase, and Git LFS
    • Pull-request workflows and integrations with major Git hosting services

    Where it doesn't

    • No perpetual free plan; access starts with a 30-day trial
    • Basic is limited to 1 user and lacks listed team-management features
    • Desktop-only, with versions for macOS and Windows

  • Fork — where it wins

    • Visual history, staging, and branch management in one desktop client
    • Supports interactive rebase, cherry-pick, stash, and conflict resolution
    • Connects to GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; the license costs $59 per user
    • Available only for macOS and Windows
    • Desktop-focused, with no mobile or web client
  • Tower7.1/10 · From $5.75/user/mo (annual) · 30-day trial

    A paid desktop Git client with visual workflows, pull requests, and team plans.

    Visit TowerFull verdict →
  • Fork6.8/10 · From $59/user

    Fork covers core visual Git workflows with a one-time $59 desktop license.

    Visit ForkFull verdict →

More comparisons

All git clients comparisons → · Full ranking →

Guides on git clients

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update