Head-to-head · Cloud Storage Gateway Software
Tiger Bridge vs ObjectiveFS
Tiger Bridge leads on 0 checks, ObjectiveFS on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreTiger Bridge · 8.7/10
- Free trialboth
Tiger Bridge scores higher on our rubric for cloud storage gateway software: 8.7 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #12.
Tiger Bridge is the better fit for windows teams needing low-cost cloud tiering. ObjectiveFS is the better fit for technical teams needing POSIX cloud filesystems.
- Tiger Bridge fits best
Windows teams needing low-cost cloud tiering
- ObjectiveFS fits best
Technical teams needing POSIX cloud filesystems
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Tiger Bridge 8.7/10 Visit ↗ | ObjectiveFS 7.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Ranking | #6 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software | #12 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software |
| Best for | Windows teams needing low-cost cloud tiering | Technical teams needing POSIX cloud filesystems |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $0.006/GB/mo | $99/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | 30 days | 14 days |
| Free trial length | 30 days · no card needed | 14 days · no card needed |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows | Linux, macOS |
| Support | Email, Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 | Email, Phone, Docs |
| Integrations | 14 integrations | 13 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Tiger Bridge 3/3 · ObjectiveFS 3/3 | ||
| Global namespace | ✓ | ✓ |
| Local caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge synchronization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Supported protocols | SMB/CIFS, NFS, S3-compatible object storage | FUSE, NFS, SMB |
| Cloud storage targets | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Huawei Cloud, Backblaze B2, Google Drive, LYVE Cloud, Wasabi, S3-compatible object storage | Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Oracle Cloud, DigitalOcean Spaces, Scaleway, Wasabi, Ceph, MinIO, NetApp StorageGRID, Hitachi Content Platform, S3-compatible object stores |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Tiger Bridge connects Windows-based local or network storage with public cloud, private cloud, object, file, and tape targets. It is designed for organizations managing growing data across on-premises infrastructure and cloud services,… Read the review → |
ObjectiveFS is a distributed, POSIX-compliant FUSE filesystem for Linux and macOS. It uses cloud or on-premise object storage as its backend while presenting shared file access to cloud instances, containers, laptops, office servers, web… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Tiger Bridge — where it wins
- Global namespace across on-premises and cloud environments
- Policy-based tiering with stubbing and space reclamation
- Ransomware protection, versioning, replication, and integrity checks
Where it doesn't
- Windows is the listed platform
- No free plan beyond the 30-day trial
- Monthly costs increase with stored capacity
ObjectiveFS — where it wins
- POSIX-compliant filesystem with concurrent access across mounted machines
- Supports caching, snapshots, encryption, and data-integrity checks
- Connects to major object stores, including Amazon S3 and Azure Blob Storage
Where it doesn't
- Paid plans start at $99 per month
- Runs on Linux and macOS only
- Advanced capabilities are reserved for higher paid tiers
- Tiger Bridge8.7/10 · 30-day trial
Windows teams get policy-based cloud tiering, synchronization, and protection at low per-GB pricing.
Visit Tiger BridgeFull verdict → - ObjectiveFS7.9/10 · 14-day trial
ObjectiveFS brings shared POSIX file access, caching, snapshots, and encryption to object storage.
Visit ObjectiveFSFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Tiger Bridge
- Nasuni File Data Platform vs Tiger Bridge
- Panzura CloudFS vs Tiger Bridge
- AWS Storage Gateway vs Tiger Bridge
- LucidLink vs Tiger Bridge
- Tiger Bridge vs Peer Global File Service
- Tiger Bridge vs Quantum StorNext
All cloud storage gateway software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update








