Head-to-head · Cloud Storage Gateway Software
Tiger Bridge vs Quantum StorNext
Tiger Bridge leads on 0 checks, Quantum StorNext on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreTiger Bridge · 8.7/10
- Free trialonly Tiger Bridge
Tiger Bridge scores higher on our rubric for cloud storage gateway software: 8.7 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.
Tiger Bridge is the better fit for windows teams needing low-cost cloud tiering. Quantum StorNext is the better fit for media workflows needing high-performance tiering.
- Tiger Bridge fits best
Windows teams needing low-cost cloud tiering
- Quantum StorNext fits best
Media workflows needing high-performance tiering
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Tiger Bridge 8.7/10 Visit ↗ | Quantum StorNext 8.4/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Ranking | #6 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software | #8 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software |
| Best for | Windows teams needing low-cost cloud tiering | Media workflows needing high-performance tiering |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $0.006/GB/mo | Pricing on request |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | 30 days | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud, Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Email, Phone, Tickets, Docs · 24/7 | Tickets, Docs |
| Integrations | 14 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Tiger Bridge 3/3 · Quantum StorNext 3/3 | ||
| Global namespace | ✓ | ✓ |
| Local caching | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge synchronization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Supported protocols | SMB/CIFS, NFS, S3-compatible object storage | SMB, NFS, native StorNext LAN/SAN, Xsan |
| Cloud storage targets | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Google Cloud Storage, IBM Cloud Object Storage, Huawei Cloud, Backblaze B2, Google Drive, LYVE Cloud, Wasabi, S3-compatible object storage | Amazon Web Services S3, Quantum ActiveScale |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Tiger Bridge connects Windows-based local or network storage with public cloud, private cloud, object, file, and tape targets. It is designed for organizations managing growing data across on-premises infrastructure and cloud services,… Read the review → |
Quantum StorNext is a high-performance shared storage file system for media production, research, AI, and other data-intensive environments. It provides shared file access across Windows, macOS, and Linux, with SMB, NFS, native StorNext… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Tiger Bridge — where it wins
- Global namespace across on-premises and cloud environments
- Policy-based tiering with stubbing and space reclamation
- Ransomware protection, versioning, replication, and integrity checks
Where it doesn't
- Windows is the listed platform
- No free plan beyond the 30-day trial
- Monthly costs increase with stored capacity
Quantum StorNext — where it wins
- Unified namespace spans flash, disk, object, and tape storage
- Shared access supports collaborative, data-intensive workflows
- FlexSync handles replication and synchronization across systems and S3 repositories
Where it doesn't
- Licensing and subscriptions require contacting Quantum or a reseller
- Verified cloud targets are limited to Amazon S3 and Quantum ActiveScale
- No free plan is available
- Tiger Bridge8.7/10 · 30-day trial
Windows teams get policy-based cloud tiering, synchronization, and protection at low per-GB pricing.
Visit Tiger BridgeFull verdict → - Quantum StorNext8.4/10 · Pricing on request
High-performance shared storage for media and other data-intensive workflows.
Visit QuantumFull verdict →
More comparisons
- CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Tiger Bridge
- CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Quantum StorNext
- Nasuni File Data Platform vs Tiger Bridge
- Nasuni File Data Platform vs Quantum StorNext
- Panzura CloudFS vs Tiger Bridge
- Panzura CloudFS vs Quantum StorNext
- AWS Storage Gateway vs Tiger Bridge
- AWS Storage Gateway vs Quantum StorNext
All cloud storage gateway software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





