Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Honeypot Software

T-Pot vs DentiGrid

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score T-Pot #3 in Honeypot Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit T-Pot
DentiGrid #8 in Honeypot Software 8.2/10 Paid ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit DentiGrid

T-Pot leads on 0 checks, DentiGrid on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreT-Pot · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly T-Pot
  • Most featuresDentiGrid · 2 of 2

T-Pot scores higher on our rubric for honeypot software: 9.0 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

On deployment model, DentiGrid gives you Hybrid where T-Pot offers Self-hosted.

T-Pot is the better fit for maximum honeypot breadth in one platform. DentiGrid is the better fit for affordable hybrid deception and MSSP use.

  • T-Pot fits best

    Maximum honeypot breadth in one platform

  • DentiGrid fits best

    Affordable hybrid deception and MSSP use

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature T-Pot 9.0/10 Visit ↗ DentiGrid 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.2
Ranking #3 in Honeypot Software #8 in Honeypot Software
Best for Maximum honeypot breadth in one platform Affordable hybrid deception and MSSP use
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan —
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Linux, macOS, Windows Web
Support Community, Docs Email, Docs · 24/7
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features T-Pot 0/2 · DentiGrid 2/2
Credential lures Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Cloud decoys Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment model Self-hosted Hybrid
Decoy scope Multi-layer Multi-layer
Maximum decoys Not checked yet 3 decoys
Data retention Not checked yet 30 days
Our review
Pros
  • More than 20 honeypots bundled in one platform
  • Elastic dashboards, attack maps, and network monitoring included
  • Supports standalone Hive or distributed Hive and Sensor deployments
  • Multi-layer decoys span credentials, databases, cloud resources, and networks
  • Authenticated telemetry integrates with Splunk, Sentinel, Elastic, and QRadar
  • Docker deployment and multi-tenant management support hybrid MSSP operations
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure and administration
  • macOS and Windows support is limited to Docker Desktop deployments
  • Stored honeypot logs are persisted for 30 days
  • Core is limited to basic deception, analytics, and standard email support
  • Advanced workflows, blocklists, and SIEM integrations require Growth
  • Self-hosted decoys require Docker deployment and operational ownership
Our verdict

T-Pot is a self-hosted, open-source honeypot platform for security monitoring, deception, and research environments. It brings more than 20 honeypots into one deployment, with Elastic Stack event storage, ingestion, and dashboards…

Read the review →

DentiGrid is a paid SIEM-native honeypot and active-deception platform for managed security service providers and enterprise SOC teams. It distributes synthetic SSH keys, canary tokens, decoy database tables, AWS credentials, and cloud…

Read the review →
  1. T-PotHoneypot Software 9.0Free plan
  2. DentiGridHoneypot Software 8.2Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • T-Pot — where it wins

    • More than 20 honeypots bundled in one platform
    • Elastic dashboards, attack maps, and network monitoring included
    • Supports standalone Hive or distributed Hive and Sensor deployments

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure and administration
    • macOS and Windows support is limited to Docker Desktop deployments
    • Stored honeypot logs are persisted for 30 days
  • DentiGrid — where it wins

    • Multi-layer decoys span credentials, databases, cloud resources, and networks
    • Authenticated telemetry integrates with Splunk, Sentinel, Elastic, and QRadar
    • Docker deployment and multi-tenant management support hybrid MSSP operations

    Where it doesn't

    • Core is limited to basic deception, analytics, and standard email support
    • Advanced workflows, blocklists, and SIEM integrations require Growth
    • Self-hosted decoys require Docker deployment and operational ownership
  • T-Pot9.0/10 · Free plan

    A broad self-hosted honeypot platform for teams that want many decoys and built-in analysis.

    Visit T-PotFull verdict →
  • DentiGrid8.2/10 · Paid

    A hybrid honeypot platform with layered decoys, telemetry, and security-operations integrations.

    Visit DentiGridFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update