Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Honeypot Software

Cowrie vs DentiGrid

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Cowrie #2 in Honeypot Software 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Cowrie
DentiGrid #8 in Honeypot Software 8.2/10 Paid ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit DentiGrid

Cowrie leads on 0 checks, DentiGrid on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCowrie · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Cowrie
  • Most featuresDentiGrid · 2 of 2

Cowrie scores higher on our rubric for honeypot software: 9.2 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

On deployment model, DentiGrid gives you Hybrid where Cowrie offers Self-hosted.

Cowrie is the better fit for mature SSH and Telnet monitoring. DentiGrid is the better fit for affordable hybrid deception and MSSP use.

  • Cowrie fits best

    Mature SSH and Telnet monitoring

  • DentiGrid fits best

    Affordable hybrid deception and MSSP use

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Cowrie 9.2/10 Visit ↗ DentiGrid 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.2
Ranking #2 in Honeypot Software #8 in Honeypot Software
Best for Mature SSH and Telnet monitoring Affordable hybrid deception and MSSP use
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan —
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Linux Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email, Docs · 24/7
Integrations 40+ integrations 12 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Cowrie 1/2 · DentiGrid 2/2
Credential lures ✓ ✓
Cloud decoys Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment model Self-hosted Hybrid
Decoy scope Multi-layer Multi-layer
Maximum decoys Not checked yet 3 decoys
Data retention Not checked yet 30 days
Our review
Pros
  • Detailed SSH and Telnet session logging, replay, and file capture
  • Configurable Unix shell and fake filesystem for layered decoys
  • Broad integrations across SIEMs, databases, messaging, and threat intelligence
  • Multi-layer decoys span credentials, databases, cloud resources, and networks
  • Authenticated telemetry integrates with Splunk, Sentinel, Elastic, and QRadar
  • Docker deployment and multi-tenant management support hybrid MSSP operations
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires Linux-based operational ownership
  • Primary monitoring scope centers on SSH and Telnet activity
  • Experimental LLM backend may not suit production-critical workflows
  • Core is limited to basic deception, analytics, and standard email support
  • Advanced workflows, blocklists, and SIEM integrations require Growth
  • Self-hosted decoys require Docker deployment and operational ownership
Our verdict

Cowrie is an open-source SSH and Telnet honeypot for security researchers, CERTs, defenders, and other operators. It runs on Linux in self-hosted environments and emulates a Unix-like system with a configurable fake filesystem. The product…

Read the review →

DentiGrid is a paid SIEM-native honeypot and active-deception platform for managed security service providers and enterprise SOC teams. It distributes synthetic SSH keys, canary tokens, decoy database tables, AWS credentials, and cloud…

Read the review →
  1. CowrieHoneypot Software 9.2Free plan
  2. DentiGridHoneypot Software 8.2Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Cowrie — where it wins

    • Detailed SSH and Telnet session logging, replay, and file capture
    • Configurable Unix shell and fake filesystem for layered decoys
    • Broad integrations across SIEMs, databases, messaging, and threat intelligence

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires Linux-based operational ownership
    • Primary monitoring scope centers on SSH and Telnet activity
    • Experimental LLM backend may not suit production-critical workflows
  • DentiGrid — where it wins

    • Multi-layer decoys span credentials, databases, cloud resources, and networks
    • Authenticated telemetry integrates with Splunk, Sentinel, Elastic, and QRadar
    • Docker deployment and multi-tenant management support hybrid MSSP operations

    Where it doesn't

    • Core is limited to basic deception, analytics, and standard email support
    • Advanced workflows, blocklists, and SIEM integrations require Growth
    • Self-hosted decoys require Docker deployment and operational ownership

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update