Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Honeypot Software

Beelzebub vs Cowrie

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Beelzebub #1 in Honeypot Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Beelzebub
Cowrie #2 in Honeypot Software 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Cowrie

Beelzebub leads on 0 checks, Cowrie on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBeelzebub · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresBeelzebub · 2 of 2

Beelzebub scores higher on our rubric for honeypot software: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Beelzebub is the better fit for broad, adaptive self-hosted deception. Cowrie is the better fit for mature SSH and Telnet monitoring.

  • Beelzebub fits best

    Broad, adaptive self-hosted deception

  • Cowrie fits best

    Mature SSH and Telnet monitoring

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Beelzebub 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Cowrie 9.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.2
Ranking #1 in Honeypot Software #2 in Honeypot Software
Best for Broad, adaptive self-hosted deception Mature SSH and Telnet monitoring
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Self-hosted
Support Docs Email, Community, Docs
Integrations 11 integrations 40+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Beelzebub 2/2 · Cowrie 1/2
Credential lures ✓ ✓
Cloud decoys ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Self-hosted Self-hosted
Decoy scope Multi-layer Multi-layer
Maximum decoys Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP decoy interactions
  • Combines static handlers with adaptive LLM-powered responses
  • Offers Docker, Kubernetes, APIs, metrics, plugins, and SIEM integrations
  • Detailed SSH and Telnet session logging, replay, and file capture
  • Configurable Unix shell and fake filesystem for layered decoys
  • Broad integrations across SIEMs, databases, messaging, and threat intelligence
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
  • YAML configuration and Go plugins suit technical security teams
  • Managed coordination is provided through a separate Beelzebub Platform offering
  • Self-hosted deployment requires Linux-based operational ownership
  • Primary monitoring scope centers on SSH and Telnet activity
  • Experimental LLM backend may not suit production-critical workflows
Our verdict

Beelzebub is an open-source deception runtime for security operators, AI security teams, and developers who need configurable honeypots and decoy services. Its multi-layer scope covers SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP interactions, with…

Read the review →

Cowrie is an open-source SSH and Telnet honeypot for security researchers, CERTs, defenders, and other operators. It runs on Linux in self-hosted environments and emulates a Unix-like system with a configurable fake filesystem. The product…

Read the review →
  1. BeelzebubHoneypot Software 9.4Free plan
  2. CowrieHoneypot Software 9.2Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Beelzebub — where it wins

    • Supports SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP decoy interactions
    • Combines static handlers with adaptive LLM-powered responses
    • Offers Docker, Kubernetes, APIs, metrics, plugins, and SIEM integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
    • YAML configuration and Go plugins suit technical security teams
    • Managed coordination is provided through a separate Beelzebub Platform offering
  • Cowrie — where it wins

    • Detailed SSH and Telnet session logging, replay, and file capture
    • Configurable Unix shell and fake filesystem for layered decoys
    • Broad integrations across SIEMs, databases, messaging, and threat intelligence

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires Linux-based operational ownership
    • Primary monitoring scope centers on SSH and Telnet activity
    • Experimental LLM backend may not suit production-critical workflows

Beelzebub vs Cowrie: questions

Which is better for honeypot software, Beelzebub or Cowrie?

Beelzebub scores higher on our rubric for honeypot software: 9.4 against 9.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

How do Beelzebub and Cowrie compare?

All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Beelzebub and Cowrie have a free plan?

Beelzebub: Yes. Cowrie: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update