Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Honeypot Software

Beelzebub vs T-Pot

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Beelzebub #1 in Honeypot Software 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Beelzebub
T-Pot #3 in Honeypot Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit T-Pot

Beelzebub leads on 0 checks, T-Pot on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreBeelzebub · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresBeelzebub · 2 of 2

Beelzebub scores higher on our rubric for honeypot software: 9.4 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Beelzebub is the better fit for broad, adaptive self-hosted deception. T-Pot is the better fit for maximum honeypot breadth in one platform.

  • Beelzebub fits best

    Broad, adaptive self-hosted deception

  • T-Pot fits best

    Maximum honeypot breadth in one platform

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Beelzebub 9.4/10 Visit ↗ T-Pot 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.0
Ranking #1 in Honeypot Software #3 in Honeypot Software
Best for Broad, adaptive self-hosted deception Maximum honeypot breadth in one platform
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Self-hosted, Cloud, Desktop
Support Docs Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Beelzebub 2/2 · T-Pot 0/2
Credential lures ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Cloud decoys ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Self-hosted Self-hosted
Decoy scope Multi-layer Multi-layer
Maximum decoys Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data retention Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP decoy interactions
  • Combines static handlers with adaptive LLM-powered responses
  • Offers Docker, Kubernetes, APIs, metrics, plugins, and SIEM integrations
  • More than 20 honeypots bundled in one platform
  • Elastic dashboards, attack maps, and network monitoring included
  • Supports standalone Hive or distributed Hive and Sensor deployments
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
  • YAML configuration and Go plugins suit technical security teams
  • Managed coordination is provided through a separate Beelzebub Platform offering
  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure and administration
  • macOS and Windows support is limited to Docker Desktop deployments
  • Stored honeypot logs are persisted for 30 days
Our verdict

Beelzebub is an open-source deception runtime for security operators, AI security teams, and developers who need configurable honeypots and decoy services. Its multi-layer scope covers SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP interactions, with…

Read the review →

T-Pot is a self-hosted, open-source honeypot platform for security monitoring, deception, and research environments. It brings more than 20 honeypots into one deployment, with Elastic Stack event storage, ingestion, and dashboards…

Read the review →
  1. BeelzebubHoneypot Software 9.4Free plan
  2. T-PotHoneypot Software 9.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Beelzebub — where it wins

    • Supports SSH, HTTP, TCP, TELNET, and MCP decoy interactions
    • Combines static handlers with adaptive LLM-powered responses
    • Offers Docker, Kubernetes, APIs, metrics, plugins, and SIEM integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership
    • YAML configuration and Go plugins suit technical security teams
    • Managed coordination is provided through a separate Beelzebub Platform offering
  • T-Pot — where it wins

    • More than 20 honeypots bundled in one platform
    • Elastic dashboards, attack maps, and network monitoring included
    • Supports standalone Hive or distributed Hive and Sensor deployments

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure and administration
    • macOS and Windows support is limited to Docker Desktop deployments
    • Stored honeypot logs are persisted for 30 days
  • Beelzebub9.4/10 · Free plan

    A flexible self-hosted honeypot runtime with adaptive interactions and deep security integrations.

    Visit BeelzebubFull verdict →
  • T-Pot9.0/10 · Free plan

    A broad self-hosted honeypot platform for teams that want many decoys and built-in analysis.

    Visit T-PotFull verdict →

Beelzebub vs T-Pot: questions

Which is better for honeypot software, Beelzebub or T-Pot?

Beelzebub scores higher on our rubric for honeypot software: 9.4 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

How do Beelzebub and T-Pot compare?

All 3 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Beelzebub and T-Pot have a free plan?

Beelzebub: Yes. T-Pot: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update