Head-to-head · RFP Software
Scanmarket eRFx vs RFP.co
Scanmarket eRFx leads on 0 checks, RFP.co on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreScanmarket eRFx · 8.9/10
Scanmarket eRFx scores higher on our rubric for rfp software: 8.9 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.
Scanmarket eRFx is the better fit for mature sourcing teams running complex events. RFP.co is the better fit for small teams needing affordable proposal workflows.
- Scanmarket eRFx fits best
Mature sourcing teams running complex events
- RFP.co fits best
Small teams needing affordable proposal workflows
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Scanmarket eRFx 8.9/10 Visit ↗ | RFP.co 8.3/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Ranking | #3 in RFP Software | #7 in RFP Software |
| Best for | Mature sourcing teams running complex events | Small teams needing affordable proposal workflows |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Pricing on request | $290/yr |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Live chat, Phone | |
| Built for | Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market |
| Features Scanmarket eRFx 3/4 · RFP.co 3/4 | ||
| Supplier portal | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Response scoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Approval workflows | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| RFP template library | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Included user seats | Not checked yet | 2 users |
| Response collection | Portal | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Scanmarket eRFx is cloud-based source-to-contract software from Unit4 for procurement teams managing RFI, RFP and RFQ events. It supports event design, supplier distribution, response collection, bid evaluation and reporting. Suppliers… Read the review → |
RFP.co combines procurement opportunity discovery with proposal response work in one web and API-based platform. It is designed for small teams, capture teams, business development organizations, and agencies responding for clients. The… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Scanmarket eRFx — where it wins
- Supports RFI, RFP and RFQ event management in one platform
- Combines weighted scoring with scenario analysis and bid comparison
- Provides supplier collaboration, audit logs and event reporting
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires a contact-sales process
- Platform access is web-only
- Its focus is strategic sourcing events rather than broad procurement operations
RFP.co — where it wins
- Combines opportunity discovery, qualification, drafting, and exports
- Explained matching scores and Go/No-Go decision records
- Approval gates, version history, branded DOCX and PDF exports
Where it doesn't
- No free plan for teams evaluating the workflow
- No supplier response portal
- Advanced controls are reserved for higher-priced plans
- Scanmarket eRFx8.9/10 · Pricing on request
A web-based sourcing suite for structured supplier events, evaluation and audit reporting.
Visit ScanmarketFull verdict → - RFP.co8.3/10 · Paid
A paid RFP workspace that connects opportunity discovery, drafting, collaboration, and approvals.
Visit RFP.coFull verdict →
More comparisons
- RFP360.AI vs Scanmarket eRFx
- RFP360.AI vs RFP.co
- BidNet Direct vs Scanmarket eRFx
- BidNet Direct vs RFP.co
- Scanmarket eRFx vs ARCUS eRFX
- Scanmarket eRFx vs TenderOS
- Scanmarket eRFx vs TenderWorks
- Scanmarket eRFx vs PowerRFP
All RFP software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






