Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Linters

Ruff vs PMD

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Ruff #2 in Linters 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Ruff
PMD #9 in Linters 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit PMD

Ruff leads on 0 checks, PMD on 2, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRuff · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth

Ruff scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.2 against 8.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #9.

PMD leads on languages supported: 16 versus 1. PMD offers custom rules; Ruff doesn't.

Ruff is the better fit for python teams wanting linting and formatting together. PMD is the better fit for multilanguage static-analysis programs.

  • Ruff fits best

    Python teams wanting linting and formatting together

  • PMD fits best

    Multilanguage static-analysis programs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Ruff 9.2/10 Visit ↗ PMD 8.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.3
Ranking #2 in Linters #9 in Linters
Best for Python teams wanting linting and formatting together Multilanguage static-analysis programs
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, Linux, macOS
Support Docs Docs
Integrations 10 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Ruff 3/4 · PMD 3/4
Autofix ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Custom rules — ✓ (best)
Security rules ✓ ✓
CI support ✓ ✓
Specs
Languages supported 1 16 (best)
IDE support Ide Ide
Our review
Pros
  • More than 900 built-in lint rules
  • Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
  • Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations
  • 400+ built-in rules across 16 supported languages
  • Custom Java and XPath rules plus CPD duplicate-code detection
  • Integrates with major build tools, IDEs, and CI workflows
Cons
  • Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
  • Custom lint rules are not supported
  • Third-party plugins are not supported
  • Autofix is not part of the stated core capabilities
  • Its breadth may require managing rules across multiple languages
  • Platform coverage is listed as Windows, Linux, and self-hosted
Our verdict

Ruff is an open-source Python linter and code formatter for developers and teams. It checks Python files with the ruff check command, automatically fixes supported violations, and formats Python code. Its focus suits Python projects that…

Read the review →

PMD is an open-source, extensible static code analyzer for developers and development teams working across multiple programming languages. Its published capabilities cover 16 languages and include checks for common programming flaws such…

Read the review →
  1. RuffLinters 9.2Free plan
  2. PMDLinters 8.3Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Ruff — where it wins

    • More than 900 built-in lint rules
    • Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
    • Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
    • Custom lint rules are not supported
    • Third-party plugins are not supported
  • PMD — where it wins

    • 400+ built-in rules across 16 supported languages
    • Custom Java and XPath rules plus CPD duplicate-code detection
    • Integrates with major build tools, IDEs, and CI workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Autofix is not part of the stated core capabilities
    • Its breadth may require managing rules across multiple languages
    • Platform coverage is listed as Windows, Linux, and self-hosted

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update