Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Linters

Ruff vs Credo

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Ruff #2 in Linters 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Ruff
Credo #7 in Linters 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Credo

Ruff leads on 0 checks, Credo on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRuff · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth

Ruff scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.2 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

Credo offers custom rules; Ruff doesn't.

Ruff is the better fit for python teams wanting linting and formatting together. Credo is the better fit for elixir teams checking style and complexity.

  • Ruff fits best

    Python teams wanting linting and formatting together

  • Credo fits best

    Elixir teams checking style and complexity

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Ruff 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Credo 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.5
Ranking #2 in Linters #7 in Linters
Best for Python teams wanting linting and formatting together Elixir teams checking style and complexity
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Support Docs Docs
Integrations 10 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Ruff 3/4 · Credo 3/4
Autofix ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Custom rules — ✓ (best)
Security rules ✓ ✓
CI support ✓ ✓
Specs
Languages supported 1 1
IDE support Ide Ide
Our review
Pros
  • More than 900 built-in lint rules
  • Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
  • Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations
  • Covers mistakes, style, refactoring, and complexity findings
  • Supports strict mode, explanations, JSON, and SARIF output
  • Offers custom checks, plugins, and broad editor integrations
Cons
  • Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
  • Custom lint rules are not supported
  • Third-party plugins are not supported
  • Supports Elixir rather than multiple programming languages
  • Installation and use center on Mix and the command line
  • Teams may need another tool for broader language coverage
Our verdict

Ruff is an open-source Python linter and code formatter for developers and teams. It checks Python files with the ruff check command, automatically fixes supported violations, and formats Python code. Its focus suits Python projects that…

Read the review →

Credo is an open-source static code analysis tool for Elixir projects. It is aimed at developers and teams that want consistent style, maintainable code, and earlier feedback on common mistakes. Its checks cover naming, coding style,…

Read the review →
  1. RuffLinters 9.2Free plan
  2. CredoLinters 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Ruff — where it wins

    • More than 900 built-in lint rules
    • Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
    • Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
    • Custom lint rules are not supported
    • Third-party plugins are not supported
  • Credo — where it wins

    • Covers mistakes, style, refactoring, and complexity findings
    • Supports strict mode, explanations, JSON, and SARIF output
    • Offers custom checks, plugins, and broad editor integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports Elixir rather than multiple programming languages
    • Installation and use center on Mix and the command line
    • Teams may need another tool for broader language coverage

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update