Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Linters

Ruff vs Clippy

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Ruff #2 in Linters 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Ruff
Clippy #6 in Linters 8.6/10 Open source ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Clippy

Ruff leads on 0 checks, Clippy on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRuff · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Ruff

Ruff scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.2 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Ruff is the better fit for python teams wanting linting and formatting together. Clippy is the better fit for rust developers seeking extensive lint coverage.

  • Ruff fits best

    Python teams wanting linting and formatting together

  • Clippy fits best

    Rust developers seeking extensive lint coverage

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Ruff 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Clippy 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.6
Ranking #2 in Linters #6 in Linters
Best for Python teams wanting linting and formatting together Rust developers seeking extensive lint coverage
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Docs, Community
Integrations 10 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Ruff 3/4 · Clippy 3/4
Autofix ✓ ✓
Custom rules — —
Security rules ✓ ✓
CI support ✓ ✓
Specs
Languages supported 1 1
IDE support Ide Ide
Our review
Pros
  • More than 900 built-in lint rules
  • Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
  • Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations
  • More than 800 lints across correctness, style, performance, and more
  • Runs with Cargo or clippy-driver for non-Cargo projects
  • Supports configuration, workspace checks, autofix, and CI enforcement
Cons
  • Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
  • Custom lint rules are not supported
  • Third-party plugins are not supported
  • Supports Rust rather than multiple programming languages
  • Autofix applies only to supported lint suggestions
  • Integrations focus on Rustup, Cargo, and rust-analyzer
Our verdict

Ruff is an open-source Python linter and code formatter for developers and teams. It checks Python files with the ruff check command, automatically fixes supported violations, and formats Python code. Its focus suits Python projects that…

Read the review →

Clippy is an open-source Rust linter for developers and teams that want automated checks for common mistakes and idiomatic improvements. It analyzes Cargo projects through the cargo clippy subcommand and can also run through clippy-driver…

Read the review →
  1. RuffLinters 9.2Free plan
  2. ClippyLinters 8.6Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Ruff — where it wins

    • More than 900 built-in lint rules
    • Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
    • Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
    • Custom lint rules are not supported
    • Third-party plugins are not supported
  • Clippy — where it wins

    • More than 800 lints across correctness, style, performance, and more
    • Runs with Cargo or clippy-driver for non-Cargo projects
    • Supports configuration, workspace checks, autofix, and CI enforcement

    Where it doesn't

    • Supports Rust rather than multiple programming languages
    • Autofix applies only to supported lint suggestions
    • Integrations focus on Rustup, Cargo, and rust-analyzer

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update