Head-to-head · Linters
Ruff vs Clippy
Ruff leads on 0 checks, Clippy on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreRuff · 9.2/10
- Free planonly Ruff
Ruff scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.2 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.
Ruff is the better fit for python teams wanting linting and formatting together. Clippy is the better fit for rust developers seeking extensive lint coverage.
- Ruff fits best
Python teams wanting linting and formatting together
- Clippy fits best
Rust developers seeking extensive lint coverage
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Ruff 9.2/10 Visit ↗ | Clippy 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #2 in Linters | #6 in Linters |
| Best for | Python teams wanting linting and formatting together | Rust developers seeking extensive lint coverage |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Desktop |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs | Docs, Community |
| Integrations | 10 integrations | 3 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Ruff 3/4 · Clippy 3/4 | ||
| Autofix | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom rules | — | — |
| Security rules | ✓ | ✓ |
| CI support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Languages supported | 1 | 1 |
| IDE support | Ide | Ide |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Ruff is an open-source Python linter and code formatter for developers and teams. It checks Python files with the ruff check command, automatically fixes supported violations, and formats Python code. Its focus suits Python projects that… Read the review → |
Clippy is an open-source Rust linter for developers and teams that want automated checks for common mistakes and idiomatic improvements. It analyzes Cargo projects through the cargo clippy subcommand and can also run through clippy-driver… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Ruff — where it wins
- More than 900 built-in lint rules
- Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
- Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations
Where it doesn't
- Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
- Custom lint rules are not supported
- Third-party plugins are not supported
Clippy — where it wins
- More than 800 lints across correctness, style, performance, and more
- Runs with Cargo or clippy-driver for non-Cargo projects
- Supports configuration, workspace checks, autofix, and CI enforcement
Where it doesn't
- Supports Rust rather than multiple programming languages
- Autofix applies only to supported lint suggestions
- Integrations focus on Rustup, Cargo, and rust-analyzer
- Ruff9.2/10 · Free plan
Free Python linting and formatting with more than 900 built-in rules.
Visit RuffFull verdict → - Clippy8.6/10 · Open source
A deeply configurable Rust linter with more than 800 checks and CI support.
Visit ClippyFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ESLint vs Ruff
- ESLint vs Clippy
- Ruff vs ShellCheck
- Ruff vs Stylelint
- Ruff vs clang-tidy
- Ruff vs Credo
- Ruff vs Biome
- ShellCheck vs Clippy
All linters comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






