Head-to-head · Linters
Ruff vs golangci-lint
Ruff leads on 0 checks, golangci-lint on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreRuff · 9.2/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresgolangci-lint · 4 of 4
Ruff scores higher on our rubric for linters: 9.2 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #15.
golangci-lint offers custom rules; Ruff doesn't.
Ruff is the better fit for python teams wanting linting and formatting together. golangci-lint is the better fit for go teams wanting many linters in one tool.
- Ruff fits best
Python teams wanting linting and formatting together
- golangci-lint fits best
Go teams wanting many linters in one tool
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Ruff 9.2/10 Visit ↗ | golangci-lint 7.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.2 | 7.7 |
| Ranking | #2 in Linters | #15 in Linters |
| Best for | Python teams wanting linting and formatting together | Go teams wanting many linters in one tool |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs | Docs |
| Integrations | 10 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Ruff 3/4 · golangci-lint 4/4 | ||
| Autofix | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom rules | — | ✓ (best) |
| Security rules | ✓ | ✓ |
| CI support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Languages supported | 1 | 1 |
| IDE support | Ide | Ide |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Ruff is an open-source Python linter and code formatter for developers and teams. It checks Python files with the ruff check command, automatically fixes supported violations, and formats Python code. Its focus suits Python projects that… Read the review → |
golangci-lint is an open-source command-line tool for analyzing Go code with multiple linters. It is suited to Go teams that want one configurable runner for correctness, style, performance, unused-code, and security-related checks. The… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Ruff — where it wins
- More than 900 built-in lint rules
- Automatic fixes and built-in Python formatting
- Editor, notebook, CI, pre-commit, and Docker integrations
Where it doesn't
- Focused on Python rather than multiple languages
- Custom lint rules are not supported
- Third-party plugins are not supported
golangci-lint — where it wins
- Runs multiple Go linters in parallel with caching
- Supports autofixes, custom linters, and YAML configuration
- Works with major IDEs and CI systems
Where it doesn't
- Focused on Go rather than multiple programming languages
- Command-line workflow may not suit teams seeking a broader platform
- AI features are not included
- Ruff9.2/10 · Free plan
Free Python linting and formatting with more than 900 built-in rules.
Visit RuffFull verdict → - golangci-lint7.7/10 · Free plan
A focused open-source tool for running and managing many Go linters.
Visit golangci-lintFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ESLint vs Ruff
- Ruff vs ShellCheck
- Ruff vs Stylelint
- Ruff vs clang-tidy
- Ruff vs Clippy
- Ruff vs Credo
- Ruff vs Biome
All linters comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







