Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Productivity Bots Software

Range vs Standuply

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Range #3 in Productivity Bots Software 8.2/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Range
Standuply #5 in Productivity Bots Software 7.8/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Standuply

Range leads on 0 checks, Standuply on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRange · 8.2/10
  • Lowest starting priceStanduply · $1.50/user/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialboth

Range scores higher on our rubric for productivity bots software: 8.2 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

Standuply is cheaper to start at $1.50/user/mo against $8/user/mo.

Range is the better fit for teams linking check-ins, goals, and meetings. Standuply is the better fit for agile teams automating standups and retrospectives.

  • Range fits best

    Teams linking check-ins, goals, and meetings

  • Standuply fits best

    Agile teams automating standups and retrospectives

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Range 8.2/10 Visit ↗ Standuply 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.2 7.8
Ranking #3 in Productivity Bots Software #5 in Productivity Bots Software
Best for Teams linking check-ins, goals, and meetings Agile teams automating standups and retrospectives
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $8/user/mo $1.50/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days 30 days
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 30 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Browser extension Cloud
Platforms Web, Chrome extension Web
Support Live chat, Docs Email, Live chat, Docs
Integrations 75+ integrations 11 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Range 0/2 · Standuply 0/2
Workflow automation Not checked yet Not checked yet
Scheduled tasks Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Bot channels Not checked yet Not checked yet
Knowledge sources Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Max active bots Not checked yet Not checked yet
Seat limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Links daily work to hierarchical goals with tags and scheduled reminders
  • Combines async check-ins with meeting agendas, notes, and action items
  • Free plan includes unlimited integrations and Slack and Microsoft Teams
  • Automates standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, and planning poker
  • Connects with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Trello, GitHub, and Asana
  • Offers a free plan and paid options billed per user or at a flat fee
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 12 users, 3 goals, and 2 sub-teams
  • Pro costs $8 per user monthly for unlimited goals and teams
  • Enterprise-only features include SSO, premium SLA, and priority support
  • Starter limits automation to 3 respondents
  • Backlog refinement and planning poker are Business plan features
  • The Team per-user price is higher with monthly billing than annual billing
Our verdict

Range brings team check-ins, goal tracking, and meeting coordination into one workspace. It suits teams that want daily work connected to objectives and meeting follow-through, from small groups to larger organizations. Goals can be…

Read the review →

Standuply is a workflow-automation bot for Agile teams working in Slack or Microsoft Teams. It supports asynchronous standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, planning poker, polls, and surveys, with text, voice, and video responses.…

Read the review →
  1. RangeProductivity Bots Software 8.2Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. StanduplyProductivity Bots Software 7.8Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Range — where it wins

    • Links daily work to hierarchical goals with tags and scheduled reminders
    • Combines async check-ins with meeting agendas, notes, and action items
    • Free plan includes unlimited integrations and Slack and Microsoft Teams

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 12 users, 3 goals, and 2 sub-teams
    • Pro costs $8 per user monthly for unlimited goals and teams
    • Enterprise-only features include SSO, premium SLA, and priority support
  • Standuply — where it wins

    • Automates standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, and planning poker
    • Connects with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Trello, GitHub, and Asana
    • Offers a free plan and paid options billed per user or at a flat fee

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter limits automation to 3 respondents
    • Backlog refinement and planning poker are Business plan features
    • The Team per-user price is higher with monthly billing than annual billing
  • Range8.2/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Range connects async check-ins, goal tracking, and meeting follow-through in one team tool.

    Visit RangeFull verdict →
  • Standuply7.8/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    Automates async standups, retrospectives, and Agile team workflows.

    Visit StanduplyFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update