Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Productivity Bots Software

Range vs Chaser

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Range #3 in Productivity Bots Software 8.2/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Range
Chaser #7 in Productivity Bots Software 7.6/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Chaser

Range leads on 1 check, Chaser on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRange · 8.2/10
  • Lowest starting priceChaser · $7/seat/mo
  • Free planonly Range
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresChaser · 2 of 2

Range scores higher on our rubric for productivity bots software: 8.2 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

Range offers free plan; Chaser doesn't. Chaser is cheaper to start at $7/user/mo against $8/user/mo.

Range is the better fit for teams linking check-ins, goals, and meetings. Chaser is the better fit for slack teams tracking tasks from conversations.

  • Range fits best

    Teams linking check-ins, goals, and meetings

  • Chaser fits best

    Slack teams tracking tasks from conversations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Range 8.2/10 Visit ↗ Chaser 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.2 7.6
Ranking #3 in Productivity Bots Software #7 in Productivity Bots Software
Best for Teams linking check-ins, goals, and meetings Slack teams tracking tasks from conversations
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $8/user/mo $7/seat/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 14 days 14 days
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 14 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud, Browser extension Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web, Chrome extension Web, Chrome extension
Support Live chat, Docs Email, Docs
Compliance GDPR SOC 2
Integrations 75+ integrations 6,000+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market
Features Range 0/2 · Chaser 2/2
Workflow automation Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Scheduled tasks Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Bot channels Not checked yet Chat
Knowledge sources Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Cloud
Max active bots Not checked yet Not checked yet
Seat limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Links daily work to hierarchical goals with tags and scheduled reminders
  • Combines async check-ins with meeting agendas, notes, and action items
  • Free plan includes unlimited integrations and Slack and Microsoft Teams
  • Create and assign tasks directly from Slack conversations or commands
  • Automate reminders, follow-ups, and recurring tasks
  • Track work with dashboards, reports, calendars, and time tracking
Cons
  • Free plan is limited to 12 users, 3 goals, and 2 sub-teams
  • Pro costs $8 per user monthly for unlimited goals and teams
  • Enterprise-only features include SSO, premium SLA, and priority support
  • No free plan; paid access starts at $7 per seat monthly with annual billing
  • Task management is centered on Slack, not a general-purpose bot
  • The Full Workspace plan includes seats for all Members and Multi-Channel Guests
Our verdict

Range brings team check-ins, goal tracking, and meeting coordination into one workspace. It suits teams that want daily work connected to objectives and meeting follow-through, from small groups to larger organizations. Goals can be…

Read the review →

Chaser turns work discussed in Slack into assigned tasks with due dates, reminders, and follow-ups. Teams can create tasks from messages or commands, assign them to individuals, groups, or channels, and schedule recurring work. It is aimed…

Read the review →
  1. RangeProductivity Bots Software 8.2Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. ChaserProductivity Bots Software 7.614-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Range — where it wins

    • Links daily work to hierarchical goals with tags and scheduled reminders
    • Combines async check-ins with meeting agendas, notes, and action items
    • Free plan includes unlimited integrations and Slack and Microsoft Teams

    Where it doesn't

    • Free plan is limited to 12 users, 3 goals, and 2 sub-teams
    • Pro costs $8 per user monthly for unlimited goals and teams
    • Enterprise-only features include SSO, premium SLA, and priority support
  • Chaser — where it wins

    • Create and assign tasks directly from Slack conversations or commands
    • Automate reminders, follow-ups, and recurring tasks
    • Track work with dashboards, reports, calendars, and time tracking

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; paid access starts at $7 per seat monthly with annual billing
    • Task management is centered on Slack, not a general-purpose bot
    • The Full Workspace plan includes seats for all Members and Multi-Channel Guests
  • Range8.2/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    Range connects async check-ins, goal tracking, and meeting follow-through in one team tool.

    Visit RangeFull verdict →
  • Chaser7.6/10 · 14-day trial

    A Slack-focused task manager with recurring work, reminders, dashboards, and AI-agent support.

    Visit ChaserFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update