Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Productivity Bots Software

Standuply vs Chaser

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Standuply #5 in Productivity Bots Software 7.8/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Standuply
Chaser #7 in Productivity Bots Software 7.6/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Chaser

Standuply leads on 2 checks, Chaser on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreStanduply · 7.8/10
  • Lowest starting priceStanduply · $1.50/user/mo
  • Free planonly Standuply
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresChaser · 2 of 2

Standuply scores higher on our rubric for productivity bots software: 7.8 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #7.

Standuply offers free plan; Chaser doesn't. Standuply is cheaper to start at $1.50/user/mo against $7/user/mo.

Standuply is the better fit for agile teams automating standups and retrospectives. Chaser is the better fit for slack teams tracking tasks from conversations.

  • Standuply fits best

    Agile teams automating standups and retrospectives

  • Chaser fits best

    Slack teams tracking tasks from conversations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Standuply 7.8/10 Visit ↗ Chaser 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.8 7.6
Ranking #5 in Productivity Bots Software #7 in Productivity Bots Software
Best for Agile teams automating standups and retrospectives Slack teams tracking tasks from conversations
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $1.50/user/mo (best) $7/seat/mo
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 30 days 14 days
Free trial length 30 days · no card needed 14 days · no card needed
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web Web, Chrome extension
Support Email, Live chat, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 11 integrations 6,000+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market
Features Standuply 0/2 · Chaser 2/2
Workflow automation Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Scheduled tasks Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Bot channels Not checked yet Chat
Knowledge sources Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Cloud
Max active bots Not checked yet Not checked yet
Seat limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Automates standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, and planning poker
  • Connects with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Trello, GitHub, and Asana
  • Offers a free plan and paid options billed per user or at a flat fee
  • Create and assign tasks directly from Slack conversations or commands
  • Automate reminders, follow-ups, and recurring tasks
  • Track work with dashboards, reports, calendars, and time tracking
Cons
  • Starter limits automation to 3 respondents
  • Backlog refinement and planning poker are Business plan features
  • The Team per-user price is higher with monthly billing than annual billing
  • No free plan; paid access starts at $7 per seat monthly with annual billing
  • Task management is centered on Slack, not a general-purpose bot
  • The Full Workspace plan includes seats for all Members and Multi-Channel Guests
Our verdict

Standuply is a workflow-automation bot for Agile teams working in Slack or Microsoft Teams. It supports asynchronous standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, planning poker, polls, and surveys, with text, voice, and video responses.…

Read the review →

Chaser turns work discussed in Slack into assigned tasks with due dates, reminders, and follow-ups. Teams can create tasks from messages or commands, assign them to individuals, groups, or channels, and schedule recurring work. It is aimed…

Read the review →
  1. StanduplyProductivity Bots Software 7.8Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. ChaserProductivity Bots Software 7.614-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Standuply — where it wins

    • Automates standups, retrospectives, backlog refinement, and planning poker
    • Connects with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Trello, GitHub, and Asana
    • Offers a free plan and paid options billed per user or at a flat fee

    Where it doesn't

    • Starter limits automation to 3 respondents
    • Backlog refinement and planning poker are Business plan features
    • The Team per-user price is higher with monthly billing than annual billing
  • Chaser — where it wins

    • Create and assign tasks directly from Slack conversations or commands
    • Automate reminders, follow-ups, and recurring tasks
    • Track work with dashboards, reports, calendars, and time tracking

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; paid access starts at $7 per seat monthly with annual billing
    • Task management is centered on Slack, not a general-purpose bot
    • The Full Workspace plan includes seats for all Members and Multi-Channel Guests
  • Standuply7.8/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    Automates async standups, retrospectives, and Agile team workflows.

    Visit StanduplyFull verdict →
  • Chaser7.6/10 · 14-day trial

    A Slack-focused task manager with recurring work, reminders, dashboards, and AI-agent support.

    Visit ChaserFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update