Head-to-head · Application Management Software
OpenWater vs Submit.com
OpenWater leads on 0 checks, Submit.com on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreOpenWater · 9.0/10
OpenWater scores higher on our rubric for application management software: 9.0 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #8.
OpenWater is the better fit for organizations running complex multi-program applications. Submit.com is the better fit for large submission programs needing automation.
- OpenWater fits best
Organizations running complex multi-program applications
- Submit.com fits best
Large submission programs needing automation
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | OpenWater 9.0/10 Visit ↗ | Submit.com 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.0 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Application Management Software | #8 in Application Management Software |
| Best for | Organizations running complex multi-program applications | Large submission programs needing automation |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | Not published | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Docs, Tickets | Email, Phone, Live chat |
| Compliance | SSO/SAML | SOC 2, GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA |
| Integrations | 65+ integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features OpenWater 6/6 · Submit.com 6/6 | ||
| Scoring and rubrics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reviewer collaboration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Applicant portal | ✓ | ✓ |
| Workflow automation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reporting and analytics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Payment collection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Supported programs | Not published | Grants |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | OpenWater is a web-based application and review management platform for associations, foundations, higher education institutions, and other organizations managing structured programs. It brings application forms, applicant portals,… Read the review → |
Submit.com is a no-code application and submission management platform for governments, universities, foundations, nonprofits, and other organizations. It is designed for programs that need to manage applications from intake through… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
OpenWater — where it wins
- Supports grants, scholarships, awards, fellowships, and abstract management
- Combines multi-round reviews, scoring, workflows, reporting, and fund tracking
- Offers REST API access plus CRM, AMS, payment, and directory integrations
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- Broad configuration may be more than a single-program team needs
- AI features are available without further detail on their specific functions
Submit.com — where it wins
- Conditional forms, eligibility screening, and branded applicant portals
- Reviewer scoring, rubrics, comparisons, and blind review
- Automation for routing, reminders, decisions, payments, and reporting
Where it doesn't
- Starter is limited to 1,000 applicants and one program
- There is no free plan
- Pro and Enterprise pricing requires contacting sales
- OpenWater9.0/10 · Pricing on request
A broad platform for managing complex applications, reviews, workflows, funding, and reporting.
Visit OpenWaterFull verdict → - Submit.com6.9/10 · From €5,995/yr
A structured platform for automating complex application and review programs.
Visit Submit.comFull verdict →
More comparisons
- OpenWater vs Submittable
- OpenWater vs Reviewr
- OpenWater vs Flexi-Grant
- OpenWater vs RQ Platform
- OpenWater vs CommunityForce
- OpenWater vs Good Grants
- Submittable vs Submit.com
- Reviewr vs Submit.com
All application management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






