Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · SAST Tools

OpenText Fortify SAST vs Coverity Static Analysis

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Fortify SAST #4 in SAST Tools 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit OpenText
Coverity Static Analysis #23 in SAST Tools 6.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Coverity

OpenText Fortify SAST leads on 0 checks, Coverity Static Analysis on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Fortify SAST · 8.8/10

OpenText Fortify SAST scores higher on our rubric for sast tools: 8.8 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #23.

OpenText Fortify SAST is the better fit for large enterprises needing broad analysis. Coverity Static Analysis is the better fit for regulated teams needing broad SAST controls.

  • OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

    Large enterprises needing broad analysis

  • Coverity Static Analysis fits best

    Regulated teams needing broad SAST controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Fortify SAST 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Coverity Static Analysis 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 6.8
Ranking #4 in SAST Tools #23 in SAST Tools
Best for Large enterprises needing broad analysis Regulated teams needing broad SAST controls
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Features OpenText Fortify SAST 5/5 · Coverity Static Analysis 5/5
Pull request scans ✓ ✓
IDE support ✓ ✓
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
Custom security rules ✓ ✓
Automated fixes ✓ ✓
Specs
Analysis targets source code, bytecode, binaries source code
Languages supported Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries across 44+ languages and 350+ frameworks
  • Connects pull requests, IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and issue tracking
  • Adds IaC scanning, custom rules, dashboards, and AI remediation suggestions
  • Supports 22 programming languages and more than 200 frameworks
  • Combines pull-request scans, policy gates, IDE analysis, and custom checkers
  • Offers on-premises and private-cloud deployment options
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • The breadth may exceed the needs of smaller or narrowly focused teams
  • Deployment and governance options can require a structured security program
  • Pricing requires a customized enterprise quote
  • There is no free plan
  • Its enterprise scope may exceed smaller teams’ requirements
Our verdict

OpenText Fortify SAST is a static application security testing platform for development and security teams. It analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries across web, mobile, desktop, cloud-native, API, container, and…

Read the review →

Coverity Static Analysis is an enterprise SAST product for development and security teams working across large-scale applications. It analyzes source code across files and libraries to identify security vulnerabilities, code-quality…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Fortify SASTSAST Tools 8.8Pricing on request
  2. Coverity Static AnalysisSAST Tools 6.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries across 44+ languages and 350+ frameworks
    • Connects pull requests, IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and issue tracking
    • Adds IaC scanning, custom rules, dashboards, and AI remediation suggestions

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • The breadth may exceed the needs of smaller or narrowly focused teams
    • Deployment and governance options can require a structured security program
  • Coverity Static Analysis — where it wins

    • Supports 22 programming languages and more than 200 frameworks
    • Combines pull-request scans, policy gates, IDE analysis, and custom checkers
    • Offers on-premises and private-cloud deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a customized enterprise quote
    • There is no free plan
    • Its enterprise scope may exceed smaller teams’ requirements
  • OpenText Fortify SAST8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad SAST coverage for enterprises, with sales-led pricing and extensive workflow integrations.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Coverity Static Analysis6.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad language, framework, CI/CD, IDE, and deployment controls for regulated teams.

    Visit CoverityFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update