Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Static Application Security Testing Sast

OpenText Fortify SAST vs CodeSonar

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Fortify SAST #3 in Static Application Security Testing Sast 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 4 features Visit OpenText
CodeSonar #4 in Static Application Security Testing Sast 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 4 features Visit AdaCore

OpenText Fortify SAST leads on 0 checks, CodeSonar on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Fortify SAST · 8.9/10

OpenText Fortify SAST scores higher on our rubric for static application security testing sast: 8.9 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

OpenText Fortify SAST is the better fit for large development and AppSec teams. CodeSonar is the better fit for teams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis.

  • OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

    Large development and AppSec teams

  • CodeSonar fits best

    Teams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Fortify SAST 8.9/10 Visit ↗ CodeSonar 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.8
Ranking #3 in Static Application Security Testing Sast #4 in Static Application Security Testing Sast
Best for Large development and AppSec teams Teams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, Linux
Support Phone, Docs Email, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 12 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Fortify SAST 2/4 · CodeSonar 2/4
IDE integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI/CD integration ✓ ✓
Custom rules ✓ ✓
Pull request scanning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Languages supported Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
  • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
  • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation
  • Analyzes source and compiled binaries, including when source is unavailable
  • Checks C/C++ and a broad set of additional programming languages
  • Combines standards checks, custom rules, IDEs, and CI/CD integrations
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • Its broad analysis scope may exceed narrower SAST needs
  • Deployment and integrations can require coordination across toolchains
  • Pricing requires contacting the vendor
  • Deployment is limited to self-hosted and desktop options
  • Its depth and enterprise focus may exceed smaller teams' needs
Our verdict

OpenText Fortify SAST analyzes application source code, bytecode, and binaries to identify vulnerabilities during development. It is aimed at development, application security, and DevSecOps teams, particularly in mid-market and enterprise…

Read the review →

CodeSonar is a static application security testing and software-quality analysis tool for enterprise, embedded, safety-critical, and other high-integrity projects. Its whole-program semantic analysis covers C/C++ across language standards…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Fortify SASTStatic Application Security Testing Sast 8.9Pricing on request
  2. CodeSonarStatic Application Security Testing Sast 8.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
    • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
    • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • Its broad analysis scope may exceed narrower SAST needs
    • Deployment and integrations can require coordination across toolchains
  • CodeSonar — where it wins

    • Analyzes source and compiled binaries, including when source is unavailable
    • Checks C/C++ and a broad set of additional programming languages
    • Combines standards checks, custom rules, IDEs, and CI/CD integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting the vendor
    • Deployment is limited to self-hosted and desktop options
    • Its depth and enterprise focus may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • OpenText Fortify SAST8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad SAST coverage with pull-request scans, custom rules, and AI-assisted fixes.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • CodeSonar8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Whole-program code and binary analysis for teams with complex, high-integrity software.

    Visit AdaCoreFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update