Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Static Application Security Testing Sast

Checkmarx SAST vs OpenText Fortify SAST

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Checkmarx SAST #1 in Static Application Security Testing Sast 9.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Checkmarx

Checkmarx SAST leads on 0 checks, OpenText Fortify SAST on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCheckmarx SAST · 9.3/10
  • Most featuresOpenText Fortify SAST · 2 of 4

Checkmarx SAST scores higher on our rubric for static application security testing sast: 9.3 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #3.

Checkmarx SAST is the better fit for enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage. OpenText Fortify SAST is the better fit for large development and AppSec teams.

  • Checkmarx SAST fits best

    Enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage

  • OpenText Fortify SAST fits best

    Large development and AppSec teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Checkmarx SAST 9.3/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Fortify SAST 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.9
Ranking #1 in Static Application Security Testing Sast #3 in Static Application Security Testing Sast
Best for Enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage Large development and AppSec teams
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs, Tickets Phone, Docs
Compliance SOC 2 PCI DSS, ISO 27001
Integrations 40+ integrations 12 integrations
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Checkmarx SAST 0/4 · OpenText Fortify SAST 2/4
IDE integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI/CD integration Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Custom rules Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Pull request scanning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Languages supported Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes source code and data flows without requiring compilation
  • Supports custom security queries, vulnerability triage, and fix guidance
  • Connects with major CI/CD services and IDEs, including GitHub and VS Code
  • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
  • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
  • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation
Cons
  • Pricing requires a custom sales quote
  • Static analysis does not include software composition analysis
  • Hybrid deployment and query customization may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales
  • Its broad analysis scope may exceed narrower SAST needs
  • Deployment and integrations can require coordination across toolchains
Our verdict

Checkmarx SAST analyzes application source code for security vulnerabilities, compliance issues, and business-logic flaws. It is aimed at enterprise and mid-market teams that need security analysis in development workflows, including teams…

Read the review →

OpenText Fortify SAST analyzes application source code, bytecode, and binaries to identify vulnerabilities during development. It is aimed at development, application security, and DevSecOps teams, particularly in mid-market and enterprise…

Read the review →
  1. Checkmarx SASTStatic Application Security Testing Sast 9.3Pricing on request
  2. OpenText Fortify SASTStatic Application Security Testing Sast 8.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Checkmarx SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code and data flows without requiring compilation
    • Supports custom security queries, vulnerability triage, and fix guidance
    • Connects with major CI/CD services and IDEs, including GitHub and VS Code

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a custom sales quote
    • Static analysis does not include software composition analysis
    • Hybrid deployment and query customization may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • OpenText Fortify SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries
    • Scans pull requests and integrates with CI/CD and IDEs
    • Adds custom rules and AI-assisted remediation

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales
    • Its broad analysis scope may exceed narrower SAST needs
    • Deployment and integrations can require coordination across toolchains
  • Checkmarx SAST9.3/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad source analysis with custom queries and remediation guidance for enterprise teams.

    Visit CheckmarxFull verdict →
  • OpenText Fortify SAST8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad SAST coverage with pull-request scans, custom rules, and AI-assisted fixes.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update