Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Static Application Security Testing Sast

Checkmarx SAST vs CodeSonar

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Checkmarx SAST #1 in Static Application Security Testing Sast 9.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Checkmarx
CodeSonar #4 in Static Application Security Testing Sast 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 4 features Visit AdaCore

Checkmarx SAST leads on 0 checks, CodeSonar on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCheckmarx SAST · 9.3/10
  • Most featuresCodeSonar · 2 of 4

Checkmarx SAST scores higher on our rubric for static application security testing sast: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

Checkmarx SAST is the better fit for enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage. CodeSonar is the better fit for teams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis.

  • Checkmarx SAST fits best

    Enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage

  • CodeSonar fits best

    Teams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Checkmarx SAST 9.3/10 Visit ↗ CodeSonar 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #1 in Static Application Security Testing Sast #4 in Static Application Security Testing Sast
Best for Enterprise teams needing broad SAST coverage Teams needing deep multi-language and binary analysis
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, Linux Web, Windows, Linux
Support Docs, Tickets Email, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 40+ integrations 5 integrations
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Checkmarx SAST 0/4 · CodeSonar 2/4
IDE integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI/CD integration Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Custom rules Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Pull request scanning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Languages supported Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Analyzes source code and data flows without requiring compilation
  • Supports custom security queries, vulnerability triage, and fix guidance
  • Connects with major CI/CD services and IDEs, including GitHub and VS Code
  • Analyzes source and compiled binaries, including when source is unavailable
  • Checks C/C++ and a broad set of additional programming languages
  • Combines standards checks, custom rules, IDEs, and CI/CD integrations
Cons
  • Pricing requires a custom sales quote
  • Static analysis does not include software composition analysis
  • Hybrid deployment and query customization may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • Pricing requires contacting the vendor
  • Deployment is limited to self-hosted and desktop options
  • Its depth and enterprise focus may exceed smaller teams' needs
Our verdict

Checkmarx SAST analyzes application source code for security vulnerabilities, compliance issues, and business-logic flaws. It is aimed at enterprise and mid-market teams that need security analysis in development workflows, including teams…

Read the review →

CodeSonar is a static application security testing and software-quality analysis tool for enterprise, embedded, safety-critical, and other high-integrity projects. Its whole-program semantic analysis covers C/C++ across language standards…

Read the review →
  1. Checkmarx SASTStatic Application Security Testing Sast 9.3Pricing on request
  2. CodeSonarStatic Application Security Testing Sast 8.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Checkmarx SAST — where it wins

    • Analyzes source code and data flows without requiring compilation
    • Supports custom security queries, vulnerability triage, and fix guidance
    • Connects with major CI/CD services and IDEs, including GitHub and VS Code

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires a custom sales quote
    • Static analysis does not include software composition analysis
    • Hybrid deployment and query customization may exceed smaller teams' needs

  • CodeSonar — where it wins

    • Analyzes source and compiled binaries, including when source is unavailable
    • Checks C/C++ and a broad set of additional programming languages
    • Combines standards checks, custom rules, IDEs, and CI/CD integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting the vendor
    • Deployment is limited to self-hosted and desktop options
    • Its depth and enterprise focus may exceed smaller teams' needs
  • Checkmarx SAST9.3/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad source analysis with custom queries and remediation guidance for enterprise teams.

    Visit CheckmarxFull verdict →
  • CodeSonar8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Whole-program code and binary analysis for teams with complex, high-integrity software.

    Visit AdaCoreFull verdict →

More comparisons

All static application security testing sast comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update