Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Serverless Development Frameworks

OpenFaaS vs Fission

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score OpenFaaS #6 in Serverless Development Frameworks 8.4/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit OpenFaaS
Fission #7 in Serverless Development Frameworks 8.2/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Fission

OpenFaaS leads on 0 checks, Fission on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenFaaS · 8.4/10
  • Free planonly OpenFaaS
  • Free trialonly OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS scores higher on our rubric for serverless development frameworks: 8.4 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

OpenFaaS is the better fit for teams deploying containerized functions on Kubernetes. Fission is the better fit for kubernetes teams needing scalable event-triggered functions.

  • OpenFaaS fits best

    Teams deploying containerized functions on Kubernetes

  • Fission fits best

    Kubernetes teams needing scalable event-triggered functions

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenFaaS 8.4/10 Visit ↗ Fission 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.4 8.2
Ranking #6 in Serverless Development Frameworks #7 in Serverless Development Frameworks
Best for Teams deploying containerized functions on Kubernetes Kubernetes teams needing scalable event-triggered functions
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price $1,250/mo Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Self-hosted Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux Linux, macOS, Windows
Integrations 11 integrations 7 integrations
Features OpenFaaS 0/4 · Fission 0/4
Local testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Application packaging Not checked yet Not checked yet
Kubernetes support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment rollback Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported languages Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Deploy to Kubernetes, K3s, OpenShift, or a single host with faasd
  • Supports event connectors including Kafka, RabbitMQ, and PostgreSQL
  • Offers language templates plus custom container images and runtimes
  • Supports HTTP, timer, queue, and Kubernetes event triggers.
  • Automatically provisions and scales function pods.
  • Offers streaming responses and Prometheus and Fluentd integration.
Cons
  • Community Edition limits deployments to 15 functions and one namespace
  • Private function registries and scale-to-zero require a paid plan
  • Standard starts at $1,250 per month
  • Requires teams to operate the Kubernetes infrastructure themselves.
  • Deployment is CLI-based rather than through a hosted service.
  • Functions use a request-based execution model.
Our verdict

OpenFaaS is a self-hosted serverless platform for teams deploying event-driven functions and microservices as OCI container images. It targets Kubernetes, K3s, OpenShift, and single-host deployments with faasd, and is designed for cloud,…

Read the review →

Fission brings serverless-style functions to Kubernetes clusters that teams operate themselves. Developers can write short-lived functions, package them in language-specific runtime environments, and expose them through HTTP or event…

Read the review →
  1. OpenFaaSServerless Development Frameworks 8.4Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. FissionServerless Development Frameworks 8.2Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenFaaS — where it wins

    • Deploy to Kubernetes, K3s, OpenShift, or a single host with faasd
    • Supports event connectors including Kafka, RabbitMQ, and PostgreSQL
    • Offers language templates plus custom container images and runtimes

    Where it doesn't

    • Community Edition limits deployments to 15 functions and one namespace
    • Private function registries and scale-to-zero require a paid plan
    • Standard starts at $1,250 per month
  • Fission — where it wins

    • Supports HTTP, timer, queue, and Kubernetes event triggers.
    • Automatically provisions and scales function pods.
    • Offers streaming responses and Prometheus and Fluentd integration.

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires teams to operate the Kubernetes infrastructure themselves.
    • Deployment is CLI-based rather than through a hosted service.
    • Functions use a request-based execution model.
  • OpenFaaS8.4/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A self-hosted, container-based serverless platform with broad Kubernetes targets and paid scale-to-zero.

    Visit OpenFaaSFull verdict →
  • Fission8.2/10 · Open source

    A self-hosted way to run event-triggered functions on Kubernetes, with automatic scaling.

    Visit FissionFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update