Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Serverless Development Frameworks

Apache OpenWhisk vs Fission

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
Higher score Apache OpenWhisk #3 in Serverless Development Frameworks 8.8/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 4 features Try Apache OpenWhisk
Fission #7 in Serverless Development Frameworks 8.2/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Fission

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreApache OpenWhisk · 8.8/10

Apache OpenWhisk scores higher on our rubric for serverless development frameworks: 8.8 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

Apache OpenWhisk is the better fit for teams building portable event-driven functions. Fission is the better fit for kubernetes teams needing scalable event-triggered functions.

  • Apache OpenWhisk fits best

    Teams building portable event-driven functions

  • Fission fits best

    Kubernetes teams needing scalable event-triggered functions

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Apache OpenWhisk 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Fission 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.2
Ranking #3 in Serverless Development Frameworks #7 in Serverless Development Frameworks
Best for Teams building portable event-driven functions Kubernetes teams needing scalable event-triggered functions
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Open source Open source
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop, Self-hosted Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Linux, macOS, Windows Linux, macOS, Windows
Integrations 7 integrations 7 integrations
Features Apache OpenWhisk 0/4 · Fission 0/4
Local testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Application packaging Not checked yet Not checked yet
Kubernetes support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment rollback Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported languages Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Supports triggers, rules, feeds, sequences, and synchronous or asynchronous actions
  • Offers multiple language runtimes plus custom Docker runtimes
  • Deploys locally or on Kubernetes and includes REST API access
  • Supports HTTP, timer, queue, and Kubernetes event triggers.
  • Automatically provisions and scales function pods.
  • Offers streaming responses and Prometheus and Fluentd integration.
Cons
  • Requires a self-managed deployment rather than a vendor-hosted paid service
  • Management and deployment workflows center on the CLI and YAML manifests
  • The published product details give limited development and deployment workflow guidance
  • Requires teams to operate the Kubernetes infrastructure themselves.
  • Deployment is CLI-based rather than through a hosted service.
  • Functions use a request-based execution model.
Our verdict

Apache OpenWhisk is an open-source, distributed serverless platform for running functions in response to events or HTTP requests. Its model combines actions with triggers, rules, feeds, packages, and sequences, making it a fit for teams…

Read the review →

Fission brings serverless-style functions to Kubernetes clusters that teams operate themselves. Developers can write short-lived functions, package them in language-specific runtime environments, and expose them through HTTP or event…

Read the review →
  1. Apache OpenWhiskServerless Development Frameworks 8.8Open source
  2. FissionServerless Development Frameworks 8.2Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Apache OpenWhisk — where it wins

    • Supports triggers, rules, feeds, sequences, and synchronous or asynchronous actions
    • Offers multiple language runtimes plus custom Docker runtimes
    • Deploys locally or on Kubernetes and includes REST API access

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a self-managed deployment rather than a vendor-hosted paid service
    • Management and deployment workflows center on the CLI and YAML manifests
    • The published product details give limited development and deployment workflow guidance
  • Fission — where it wins

    • Supports HTTP, timer, queue, and Kubernetes event triggers.
    • Automatically provisions and scales function pods.
    • Offers streaming responses and Prometheus and Fluentd integration.

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires teams to operate the Kubernetes infrastructure themselves.
    • Deployment is CLI-based rather than through a hosted service.
    • Functions use a request-based execution model.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update